Photo credit: Townhall Media

Recap: excellent results for conservatives from House races in Colorado (Lauren Boebert) and Illinois (Mary Miller over Squish Davis), but not as good elsewhere. Several incumbent liberal cowards in Oklahoma and Utah easily won their Republican primaries and are all but guaranteed re-election to the House in November. The time to oust these traitors is in the primaries, but the voters weren't up to the task.

Aside from Boebert's smashing win, things didn't go well in Colorado -- a member of the GOPe country-club elite won the Senate primary, and there were shenanigans galore in the important Secretary of State Republican primary which was won by what is effectively a liberal Democrat or, as the linked article puts it, a "Zuckerberg stooge" who disguised herself as a Republican and didn't even bother to do that very well. Yet she won the primary.

Photo credit: Tara for Alaska

For those who haven't been following the soap opera in the Rigged Choice Voting state of Alaska, the Democrat-RINO coalition has conceded that some true Republican (probably Sarah Palin) will win the August special election to fill the House seat of the late Don Young. However they are determined to oust Palin in the regular election in November.

Sweeney, the so-called "moderate", will, the RINOs hope, split the Republican vote sufficiently so that either a Democrat will win or Sweeney herself will win on the second ballot (which is a provision of Rigged Choice Voting when no candidate reaches 50% on the first counting of votes) after the Democrat is eliminated and the vast majority of the Democrat's votes are allocated to Sweeney. Alternatively, Sweeney could be eliminated and nearly all of her votes would then be allocated to the Democrat. In either case it's a possible win for liberals of both parties.

Photo credit: Allan Fung For Congress

It's been exactly 30 years since a Republican won a House seat in Rhode Island, so this is one instance where conservatives shouldn't complain about the squishiness of a candidate. No conservative is going to win in this D+9 district, period. Even someone who is maybe only 40% Republican and 60% Democrat is a solid improvement over the status quo in Rhode Island, and really does represent the best we can do.

It's different when RINO-type candidates are running in states like Texas or Florida, where RINOs should never get anywhere near the nomination unless they're running for the worthless Republican primary win in some 90% Democrat ghetto district, in which case nobody cares.

Photo credit: AP Photo/Brynn Anderson

The key words of this liberal-media biased headline (and the purpose of the article) are "warning for Dems". The headline leaves out the part of the story where those voters who switched to the GOP were substantially offset by the 600,000+ others who moved in the oppposite direction. So the net gain is well under 1 million, and that includes a ton of Democrat voters who switched for the sole purpose of infiltrating and sabotaging Republican primary elections.

In states such as Texas, Georgia and Ohio (and lots of others) which do not even register voters by party, the act of "switching" parties merely means that a voter in 2022 chose to vote in a different party's primary than the one in which he voted in 2020. In most cases little effort or no effort at all is required, and the decision hardly always represents some deep philosophical change on the part of the voter -- it's just a strategic ploy, or a temporary change based on a desire to vote in a more hotly contested primary election.

Photo credit: Natalie Behring

The media fervently wishes that this ruling, which deprives not one "woman or pregnant person" from their so-called right to an abortion on demand, will hurt Republicans in November and they may well be correct.

While it's true that most of the increased turnout spurred by this ruling will likely be in House districts that are already bound to vote for radical leftists, additional Democrat and RINO pro-abortionist voters in those ghetto districts and suburban soccer mommy districts is obviously not going to be beneficial to Republican chances in statewide races or in marginal House districts.

Those who claim this ruling will have NO impact on Democrat and RINO turnout in November are probably the same fools who believed that 2020 would be a GOP landslide because President Trump had all the enthusiasm on his side and Basement Biden had none whatsoever. The fact is that being rabidly against someone (liberal hatred of Trump in 2018 and 2020) or something (liberal hatred of an anti-abortionist Supreme Court ruling in 2022) is a great motivator to get to the polls, often much more so than the impulse to vote for something.

Prediction (related to the story below this one): in case RINO Don Coram can fraud his way to a Republican primary victory over Lauren Boebert next Tuesday with massive Democrat support, the media has already written the stories which will gleefully claim that "Boebert was defeated by liberal voters who were enraged by the Supreme Court decision, and this is just the first evidence that Democrats will massively increase their House and Senate majorities in November!"

Unorganized "Democrat voters" thought of this all by themselves, eh? How clever of them. The fact that the media controllers are constantly reporting this makes it blatantly obvious that they are encouraging it. If the time ever comes when the GOP endorses a "moderate" Democrat challenger to some left wing nutbucket like AOC, I doubt that we'll be able to count on the media controllers similarly endorsing THAT.

We'll find out on Tuesday just how effective this particular Democrat (and media-endorsed) dirty trick was. The chance that it will succeed is not insignificant, but if it fails, how long will it take for Boebert's RINO opponent, Don Coram, to announce his support for the Democrat in the general election? It would only be logical for Coram to support the party that tried to help him so much in the primary; the least he could do is return the favor.

If you think Boebert can't possibly lose, keep in mind that this isn't Wyoming, nor is it like MTG's heavily-Republican district in Georgia either. Boebert's a prime target and her district is a somewhat marginal one with lots of Democrats and RINOs who hate Boebert every bit as much or more than conservatives hate Liz Cheney. Unlike Wyoming, conservatives do not outnumber the sum of Democrats + RINOs here, and Democrats have made this primary a holy crusade. Boebert got only 51% in November of 2020.

Photo credit: Michael Cassidy for Congress

The incumbent squish, Michael Guest, cravenly voted to allow the creation of the "January 6th Committee" kangaroo court. Otherwise he's just been a backbencher who has had no significant impact on anything. His cowardice should not go unpunished, but it will if just a few crossover Democrats help him out in Tuesday's Republican runoff because the top two candidates were separated by less than one percentage point in the primary.

The Mississippi GOP establishment is well-known for its hatred of conservatives (remember Thad Cochran's dirty campaign vs. Chris McDaniel from a few years back?) and even now the state party chairman is actively encouraging Democrats to invade the Republican runoff election and save the more liberal candidate. The Democrat nominee in this district doesn't stand a chance in November, so Tuesday will effectively determine who occupies this House seat in 2023-24.

Photo credit: AP Photo/Chris Seward

Keep your eye on this one. Republicans barely won the 2020 Senate race here even after the Democrat candidate was engulfed in scandal (which the liberal media downplayed, of course). This time around the candidate is an ultra-liberal black female who is extremely well-funded; having failed in 2020 to purchase a Senate seat in South Carolina for some other empty (black) suit despite record-setting spending, the Democrats are trying again and have a significant probablity of success. Budd, running way behind in the cash department, needs to run a solid campaign and avoid being intimidated by the media into pulling any punches against his Marxist opponent.

Photo credit: Win McNamee/Getty Images

Same song, different verse: "Cheney's campaign has mailed instructions to Wyoming Democrats on how to change their party affiliation to vote for the incumbent congresswoman." Only morons still think that closed primaries -- like they have in Wyoming -- mean that only true members of a party can vote. Whether open or closed, it is an extremely simple matter for Democrats to cross over and sabotage Republican primaries.

Just like other supposedly legal (except where it's not) Democrat dirty tricks such as "ballot harvesting", it's hardly sufficient to note that "Republicans could do the same thing Democrats are doing", because... they don't. Furthermore, the RINO establishment is perfectly content to allow Democrats to assist in the selection of Republican nominees, as long as the Democrats are selecting the more liberal candidate. We'll see clear evidence of that next week in Illinois (conservative Mary Miller vs. RINO Rodney Davis) and Colorado (conservative Lauren Boebert vs. RINO Don Coram).

In Virginia's CD-7, another Hispanic female Republican candidate, Yesli Vega, won a primary and stands a decent chance of taking out the incumbent liberal Democrat in November. Incumbent liberal Abigail "Deep State" Spanberger is a former CIA operative who only prevailed in 2020 due to the fortuitous late-night "discovery" of thousands of suspicious votes on a previously unnoticed flash drive.

Through 2020, the bad parts of the 7th District were areas in the formerly-nice Richmond suburbs, Chesterfield and Henrico Counties (whatever good parts of Chesterfield still exist were mainly outside this district). Giddy Republicans observe that those areas have been removed in redistricting, and therefore they falsely conclude that this makes the entire 7th District more amenble to the GOP. In fact, Chesterfield and Henrico have been replaced by an even worse portion of rapidly deteriorating Prince William County. In 2020 the district was R+3 and now it is D+1 -- still very winnable for Republicans but a slightly more difficult task now than it was two years ago, even if the votes are counted honestly.

Phony "independent" but actual liberal Democrat Al Gross fared so badly in the June 11 special primary election to replace the late Don Young in Congress, that -- even though he advanced to the general election -- he has decided to drop out of the race with the expectation that he will be replaced on the ballot with fifth-place finisher "Republican" Tara Sweeney in an effort to further fracture the Republican side of the ballot. The conservative vote is already split between Palin and Begich.

Sweeney is a RINO whose puppet strings are visibly attached to RINO Senator Lisa Murkowski and other Democrats. From the article: "The parallels to the circumstances that kept Murkowski in office [in 2010] and conspiring to install Sweeney are eerie." Thanks to Rigged Choice Voting, the Democrat/RINO plan here is that either the Democrat or the RINO will win because the two conservatives will split the vote and -- very importantly -- those who vote for either Palin or Begich as their first choice will likely not vote for the other conservative candidate as their #2 choice, which will allow one of the two liberal candidates to prevail.

This was the plan all along, but Gross blew it by failing to get anyone but the lowest-info voters to select him. So now Plan B is to pull a "Torricelli": where liberals remove the failed candidate from the ballot and try to illegally replace him with someone who is likely to perform better.

Photo credit: Zeldin For New York

And every important sign says it won't. Although the article makes clear why the state of New York is in such deplorable shape and why the good people are continuing to leave in droves, the idea that a Republican could take over in Albany in 2023 is just so much baseless "hopium". The current radical leftist Governor will win by at least 15-20 points in November, and if that number is closer to 15 than 20 (or more) it will be an upset.

The only reason that ultra-liberal Republicans such as Charlie Baker, Larry Hogan and Phil Scott occasionally get elected Governor in ultra-liberal states such as Massachusetts, Maryland and Vermont is because Democrats sometimes prefer having a Republican scapegoat appear to be in charge. Veto-proof liberal majorities in the state House and Senate render the RINO Gov completely impotent legislatively, and the RINO (being ultra-liberal) rarely opposes whatever the Democrats do anyway. Then when things go off the rails thanks to the legislature's policies, the media and other Democrats have a handy target on which to deflect the blame instead of placing that blame where it rightfully belongs.

According to the leftists at The Hill, the 7 are Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Wisconsin, New Hampshire and North Carolina. The way things look now, Democrats will flip PA (and perhaps more) and Republicans will flip nothing.

In Wisconsin and North Carolina -- and Ohio, which didn't make the list -- Republicans are only slightly favored at this time to hold those seats. In NC and OH, the hypocritical liberal wing of the party is doing exactly the opposite of what they petulantly insist that conservatives in PA do, and that is to vote for a candidate they don't like; instead of party unity such as RINOs demand in PA, the squishes are running away from Vance and Budd and towards the Democrats, making flips of those seats a distinct possibility. Will the RINOs come to their senses before November?

Nevada and Arizona may be close, which only means "close but no cigar" for the GOP (same with Georgia, assuming it doesn't turn into a blowout), and New Hampshire flipping to the Republicans is a pipe dream.

Photo credit: Garcia, Flores, De La Cruz for Congress

On the heels of last week's historic win by Republican Mayra Flores in the CD-34 special election, along with the solid swing to the right by Hispanics in south Texas which occurred in the 2020 election, optimism is rampant that Republicans will pick up two more House seats in this area in November in addition to holding Flores' district.

Of the 3 Hipsanic female Republican candidates mentioned in the story, Flores has the toughest road to stay in Congress as her district moves from D+5 to D+9 thanks to redistricting. She will be facing ultra-liberal Democrat Vicente Gonzalez in a matchup of incumbents. The district which Gonzalez ran away from (CD-15) is the best chance for a GOP pickup. It is rated as even and is an open seat since Gonzalez bugged out; the Democrat candidate is a "progressive activist", i.e. a professional nutjob.

The other district (CD-28) has liberal incumbent Henry Cuellar who once masqueraded as a moderate and still has some voters fooled, but even now he's still more "moderate" than the moonbat he defeated in the Democrat primary. This seat could still flip, but based on the outcome of the primary it's more likely to be a Democrat hold. This Republican "triple threat" will likely bat only .333 in November, but in any event these are no longer districts which Democrats can take for granted, and the Republican batting average here had been .000 forever.

Photo credit: Leah Millis-Pool/Getty Images; inset-Rick Bowmer/AP

It's a poll taken by Lee's campaign, but shouldn't be too far off the mark. Egg McMuffin is nothing but a joke, just like he was in 2016 when panicked liberal Mormons, with Mitt Romney as their head puppetmaster, installed him on the presidential ballot in many states as a "conservative" (LOL) option designed to peel off enough Trump voters to ensure that Hillary would win.

Lee won by 40 points last time; he should win this time by at least 20 even though a right-wing independent candidate could siphon off more votes than usual despite Lee's lifetime ACU rating of 99%, because Lee is one of the prime movers behind the Chamber of Commerce Cheap Labor (H1B visa) Express which irritates patriotic voters as it damn well should.