County | Turnout | Mark Warner* (D) |
Ed Gillespie (R) |
Robert Sarvis (Libertarian) |
Other | Margin | TOTAL | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accomack | 37% | 4,137 | 42.8% | 5,259 | 54.5% | 256 | 2.7% | 6 | 0.1% | -1,122 | 9,658 | ||||||||
Albemarle | 40% | 17,924 | 54.2% | 13,930 | 42.2% | 1,170 | 3.5% | 16 | 0.0% | 3,994 | 33,040 | ||||||||
Alexandria city | 34% | 29,047 | 70.1% | 11,480 | 27.7% | 859 | 2.1% | 45 | 0.1% | 17,567 | 41,431 | ||||||||
Alleghany | 33% | 2,211 | 53.2% | 1,835 | 44.2% | 105 | 2.5% | 4 | 0.1% | 376 | 4,155 | ||||||||
Amelia | 40% | 1,377 | 33.8% | 2,588 | 63.6% | 100 | 2.5% | 3 | 0.1% | -1,211 | 4,068 | ||||||||
Amherst | 35% | 3,243 | 36.9% | 5,370 | 61.0% | 183 | 2.1% | 2 | 0.0% | -2,127 | 8,798 | ||||||||
Appomattox | 39% | 1,399 | 29.5% | 3,234 | 68.3% | 98 | 2.1% | 5 | 0.1% | -1,835 | 4,736 | ||||||||
Arlington | 37% | 47,709 | 70.5% | 18,239 | 26.9% | 1,660 | 2.5% | 75 | 0.1% | 29,470 | 67,683 | ||||||||
Augusta | 33% | 5,153 | 26.1% | 14,011 | 71.0% | 544 | 2.8% | 25 | 0.1% | -8,858 | 19,733 | ||||||||
Bath | 31% | 489 | 41.8% | 638 | 54.5% | 44 | 3.8% | 0 | 0.0% | -149 | 1,171 | ||||||||
Bedford | 43% | 6,855 | 27.7% | 17,280 | 69.9% | 568 | 2.3% | 8 | 0.0% | -10,425 | 24,711 | ||||||||
Bland | 33% | 514 | 28.2% | 1,266 | 69.6% | 38 | 2.1% | 2 | 0.1% | -752 | 1,820 | ||||||||
Botetourt | 42% | 3,488 | 31.5% | 7,296 | 65.9% | 285 | 2.6% | 8 | 0.1% | -3,808 | 11,077 | ||||||||
Bristol city | 27% | 1,294 | 34.0% | 2,445 | 64.2% | 64 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.1% | -1,151 | 3,806 | ||||||||
Brunswick | 32% | 2,675 | 60.6% | 1,692 | 38.3% | 48 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 983 | 4,415 | ||||||||
Buchanan | 25% | 1,794 | 38.7% | 2,794 | 60.3% | 43 | 0.9% | 4 | 0.1% | -1,000 | 4,635 | ||||||||
Buckingham | 28% | 1,785 | 45.7% | 2,015 | 51.5% | 105 | 2.7% | 5 | 0.1% | -230 | 3,910 | ||||||||
Buena Vista city | 23% | 475 | 39.4% | 692 | 57.4% | 38 | 3.2% | 1 | 0.1% | -217 | 1,206 | ||||||||
Campbell | 36% | 4,428 | 28.6% | 10,761 | 69.5% | 291 | 1.9% | 14 | 0.1% | -6,333 | 15,494 | ||||||||
Caroline | 34% | 3,879 | 51.2% | 3,517 | 46.4% | 174 | 2.3% | 6 | 0.1% | 362 | 7,576 | ||||||||
Carroll | 30% | 2,265 | 32.1% | 4,587 | 65.0% | 194 | 2.8% | 8 | 0.1% | -2,322 | 7,054 | ||||||||
Charles City | 42% | 1,593 | 64.3% | 834 | 33.7% | 48 | 1.9% | 3 | 0.1% | 759 | 2,478 | ||||||||
Charlotte | 38% | 1,462 | 40.9% | 2,062 | 57.7% | 50 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | -600 | 3,574 | ||||||||
Charlottesville city | 28% | 8,241 | 76.9% | 2,054 | 19.2% | 413 | 3.9% | 11 | 0.1% | 6,187 | 10,719 | ||||||||
Chesapeake city | 35% | 29,602 | 48.7% | 29,899 | 49.2% | 1,214 | 2.0% | 48 | 0.1% | -297 | 60,763 | ||||||||
Chesterfield | 40% | 44,491 | 44.0% | 53,306 | 52.7% | 3,272 | 3.2% | 63 | 0.1% | -8,815 | 101,132 | ||||||||
Clarke | 45% | 1,954 | 39.1% | 2,893 | 57.9% | 143 | 2.9% | 3 | 0.1% | -939 | 4,993 | ||||||||
Colonial Heights city | 34% | 1,187 | 25.4% | 3,351 | 71.6% | 139 | 3.0% | 2 | 0.0% | -2,164 | 4,679 | ||||||||
Covington city | 26% | 731 | 60.3% | 457 | 37.7% | 24 | 2.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 274 | 1,213 | ||||||||
Craig | 40% | 559 | 34.5% | 1,011 | 62.4% | 49 | 3.0% | 2 | 0.1% | -452 | 1,621 | ||||||||
Culpeper | 32% | 3,823 | 32.9% | 7,487 | 64.4% | 303 | 2.6% | 8 | 0.1% | -3,664 | 11,621 | ||||||||
Cumberland | 36% | 1,228 | 44.2% | 1,451 | 52.3% | 93 | 3.4% | 4 | 0.1% | -223 | 2,776 | ||||||||
Danville city | 32% | 6,259 | 57.9% | 4,436 | 41.0% | 114 | 1.1% | 3 | 0.0% | 1,823 | 10,812 | ||||||||
Dickenson | 28% | 1,416 | 41.9% | 1,897 | 56.2% | 40 | 1.2% | 23 | 0.7% | -481 | 3,376 | ||||||||
Dinwiddie | 33% | 3,467 | 47.3% | 3,694 | 50.4% | 146 | 2.0% | 16 | 0.2% | -227 | 7,323 | ||||||||
Emporia city | 32% | 855 | 62.3% | 501 | 36.5% | 16 | 1.2% | 1 | 0.1% | 354 | 1,373 | ||||||||
Essex | 35% | 1,419 | 47.0% | 1,545 | 51.1% | 57 | 1.9% | 1 | 0.0% | -126 | 3,022 | ||||||||
Fairfax | 36% | 176,418 | 57.7% | 122,857 | 40.2% | 6,329 | 2.1% | 265 | 0.1% | 53,561 | 305,869 | ||||||||
Fairfax city | 38% | 3,812 | 54.5% | 3,018 | 43.2% | 160 | 2.3% | 3 | 0.0% | 794 | 6,993 | ||||||||
Falls Church city | 50% | 3,599 | 71.5% | 1,309 | 26.0% | 123 | 2.4% | 3 | 0.1% | 2,290 | 5,034 | ||||||||
Fauquier | 40% | 6,985 | 33.9% | 13,219 | 64.1% | 405 | 2.0% | 6 | 0.0% | -6,234 | 20,615 | ||||||||
Floyd | 38% | 1,889 | 40.9% | 2,558 | 55.4% | 163 | 3.5% | 11 | 0.2% | -669 | 4,621 | ||||||||
Fluvanna | 40% | 3,563 | 42.8% | 4,480 | 53.8% | 274 | 3.3% | 8 | 0.1% | -917 | 8,325 | ||||||||
Franklin | 36% | 5,650 | 35.9% | 9,664 | 61.4% | 408 | 2.6% | 7 | 0.0% | -4,014 | 15,729 | ||||||||
Franklin city | 34% | 1,328 | 61.1% | 818 | 37.6% | 29 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 510 | 2,175 | ||||||||
Frederick | 35% | 6,659 | 30.3% | 14,693 | 66.9% | 556 | 2.5% | 45 | 0.2% | -8,034 | 21,953 | ||||||||
Fredericksburg city | 28% | 3,341 | 58.4% | 2,211 | 38.6% | 164 | 2.9% | 5 | 0.1% | 1,130 | 5,721 | ||||||||
Galax city | 25% | 564 | 42.1% | 743 | 55.4% | 29 | 2.2% | 4 | 0.3% | -179 | 1,340 | ||||||||
Giles | 35% | 1,760 | 37.0% | 2,856 | 60.0% | 140 | 2.9% | 4 | 0.1% | -1,096 | 4,760 | ||||||||
Gloucester | 37% | 3,729 | 33.9% | 6,988 | 63.6% | 278 | 2.5% | 1 | 0.0% | -3,259 | 10,996 | ||||||||
Goochland | 51% | 3,381 | 36.1% | 5,735 | 61.3% | 235 | 2.5% | 5 | 0.1% | -2,354 | 9,356 | ||||||||
Grayson | 33% | 1,441 | 34.8% | 2,585 | 62.3% | 109 | 2.6% | 11 | 0.3% | -1,144 | 4,146 | ||||||||
Greene | 35% | 1,655 | 32.6% | 3,223 | 63.5% | 190 | 3.7% | 4 | 0.1% | -1,568 | 5,072 | ||||||||
Greensville | 28% | 1,738 | 63.0% | 984 | 35.7% | 37 | 1.3% | 1 | 0.0% | 754 | 2,760 | ||||||||
Halifax | 35% | 4,435 | 46.2% | 5,005 | 52.1% | 153 | 1.6% | 6 | 0.1% | -570 | 9,599 | ||||||||
Hampton city | 32% | 23,483 | 68.4% | 10,149 | 29.6% | 673 | 2.0% | 24 | 0.1% | 13,334 | 34,329 | ||||||||
Hanover | 49% | 12,437 | 32.1% | 24,995 | 64.6% | 1,239 | 3.2% | 34 | 0.1% | -12,558 | 38,705 | ||||||||
Harrisonburg city | 18% | 3,865 | 51.3% | 3,332 | 44.2% | 338 | 4.5% | 4 | 0.1% | 533 | 7,539 | ||||||||
Henrico | 40% | 54,049 | 55.1% | 41,171 | 42.0% | 2,822 | 2.9% | 91 | 0.1% | 12,878 | 98,133 | ||||||||
Henry | 32% | 5,695 | 42.2% | 7,549 | 56.0% | 242 | 1.8% | 2 | 0.0% | -1,854 | 13,488 | ||||||||
Highland | 47% | 318 | 34.6% | 564 | 61.4% | 37 | 4.0% | 0 | 0.0% | -246 | 919 | ||||||||
Hopewell city | 28% | 2,412 | 50.8% | 2,197 | 46.3% | 134 | 2.8% | 5 | 0.1% | 215 | 4,748 | ||||||||
Isle of Wight | 42% | 4,979 | 41.7% | 6,714 | 56.3% | 233 | 2.0% | 9 | 0.1% | -1,735 | 11,935 | ||||||||
James City | 47% | 11,577 | 43.7% | 14,403 | 54.4% | 474 | 1.8% | 28 | 0.1% | -2,826 | 26,482 | ||||||||
King and Queen | 39% | 1,012 | 47.3% | 1,067 | 49.9% | 59 | 2.8% | 0 | 0.0% | -55 | 2,138 | ||||||||
King George | 37% | 2,460 | 36.3% | 4,148 | 61.2% | 171 | 2.5% | 4 | 0.1% | -1,688 | 6,783 | ||||||||
King William | 40% | 1,797 | 34.9% | 3,168 | 61.5% | 181 | 3.5% | 4 | 0.1% | -1,371 | 5,150 | ||||||||
Lancaster | 49% | 1,924 | 41.9% | 2,573 | 56.0% | 91 | 2.0% | 5 | 0.1% | -649 | 4,593 | ||||||||
Lee | 30% | 2,030 | 34.9% | 3,690 | 63.5% | 88 | 1.5% | 4 | 0.1% | -1,660 | 5,812 | ||||||||
Lexington city | 23% | 981 | 64.6% | 501 | 33.0% | 33 | 2.2% | 3 | 0.2% | 480 | 1,518 | ||||||||
Loudoun | 37% | 45,042 | 48.6% | 45,500 | 49.1% | 2,081 | 2.2% | 75 | 0.1% | -458 | 92,698 | ||||||||
Louisa | 37% | 3,936 | 39.1% | 5,802 | 57.6% | 333 | 3.3% | 4 | 0.0% | -1,866 | 10,075 | ||||||||
Lunenburg | 32% | 1,481 | 45.1% | 1,736 | 52.8% | 67 | 2.0% | 1 | 0.0% | -255 | 3,285 | ||||||||
Lynchburg city | 31% | 8,284 | 42.7% | 10,627 | 54.8% | 461 | 2.4% | 23 | 0.1% | -2,343 | 19,395 | ||||||||
Madison | 39% | 1,418 | 34.7% | 2,560 | 62.7% | 102 | 2.5% | 3 | 0.1% | -1,142 | 4,083 | ||||||||
Manassas city | 28% | 4,004 | 49.2% | 3,891 | 47.8% | 240 | 2.9% | 6 | 0.1% | 113 | 8,141 | ||||||||
Manassas Park city | 18% | 1,107 | 52.8% | 924 | 44.1% | 64 | 3.1% | 2 | 0.1% | 183 | 2,097 | ||||||||
Martinsville city | 33% | 2,146 | 60.6% | 1,317 | 37.2% | 75 | 2.1% | 6 | 0.2% | 829 | 3,544 | ||||||||
Mathews | 47% | 1,208 | 35.5% | 2,141 | 63.0% | 52 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | -933 | 3,401 | ||||||||
Mecklenburg | 30% | 3,266 | 42.0% | 4,375 | 56.3% | 128 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,109 | 7,769 | ||||||||
Middlesex | 42% | 1,427 | 37.3% | 2,304 | 60.3% | 91 | 2.4% | 1 | 0.0% | -877 | 3,823 | ||||||||
Montgomery | 27% | 11,110 | 51.0% | 9,776 | 44.9% | 871 | 4.0% | 9 | 0.0% | 1,334 | 21,766 | ||||||||
Nelson | 42% | 2,496 | 49.2% | 2,288 | 45.1% | 289 | 5.7% | 3 | 0.1% | 208 | 5,076 | ||||||||
New Kent | 45% | 2,303 | 32.1% | 4,668 | 65.1% | 195 | 2.7% | 10 | 0.1% | -2,365 | 7,176 | ||||||||
Newport News city | 28% | 23,405 | 60.4% | 14,548 | 37.5% | 791 | 2.0% | 26 | 0.1% | 8,857 | 38,770 | ||||||||
Norfolk city | 22% | 29,210 | 68.7% | 12,252 | 28.8% | 1,043 | 2.5% | 38 | 0.1% | 16,958 | 42,543 | ||||||||
Northampton | 36% | 1,890 | 52.9% | 1,553 | 43.5% | 127 | 3.6% | 1 | 0.0% | 337 | 3,571 | ||||||||
Northumberland | 50% | 2,089 | 40.7% | 2,939 | 57.3% | 99 | 1.9% | 1 | 0.0% | -850 | 5,128 | ||||||||
Norton city | 26% | 294 | 37.6% | 462 | 59.1% | 26 | 3.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -168 | 782 | ||||||||
Nottoway | 30% | 1,796 | 47.0% | 1,942 | 50.8% | 79 | 2.1% | 3 | 0.1% | -146 | 3,820 | ||||||||
Orange | 36% | 3,629 | 37.4% | 5,814 | 59.9% | 247 | 2.5% | 9 | 0.1% | -2,185 | 9,699 | ||||||||
Page | 30% | 1,654 | 29.3% | 3,883 | 68.8% | 101 | 1.8% | 2 | 0.0% | -2,229 | 5,640 | ||||||||
Patrick | 33% | 1,538 | 31.5% | 3,228 | 66.1% | 117 | 2.4% | 2 | 0.0% | -1,690 | 4,885 | ||||||||
Petersburg city | 30% | 6,800 | 87.8% | 843 | 10.9% | 97 | 1.3% | 8 | 0.1% | 5,957 | 7,748 | ||||||||
Pittsylvania | 37% | 6,558 | 36.2% | 11,278 | 62.3% | 250 | 1.4% | 9 | 0.0% | -4,720 | 18,095 | ||||||||
Poquoson city | 46% | 1,077 | 25.0% | 3,128 | 72.7% | 99 | 2.3% | 1 | 0.0% | -2,051 | 4,305 | ||||||||
Portsmouth city | 33% | 17,101 | 69.9% | 6,760 | 27.6% | 574 | 2.3% | 17 | 0.1% | 10,341 | 24,452 | ||||||||
Powhatan | 42% | 2,525 | 26.1% | 6,785 | 70.0% | 375 | 3.9% | 1 | 0.0% | -4,260 | 9,686 | ||||||||
Prince Edward | 26% | 2,550 | 52.4% | 2,194 | 45.1% | 122 | 2.5% | 1 | 0.0% | 356 | 4,867 | ||||||||
Prince George | 30% | 3,700 | 40.7% | 5,132 | 56.5% | 243 | 2.7% | 6 | 0.1% | -1,432 | 9,081 | ||||||||
Prince William | 31% | 48,140 | 50.4% | 45,366 | 47.5% | 1,955 | 2.0% | 67 | 0.1% | 2,774 | 95,528 | ||||||||
Pulaski | 30% | 3,301 | 39.8% | 4,796 | 57.8% | 198 | 2.4% | 8 | 0.1% | -1,495 | 8,303 | ||||||||
Radford city | 19% | 1,446 | 51.8% | 1,256 | 45.0% | 82 | 2.9% | 7 | 0.3% | 190 | 2,791 | ||||||||
Rappahannock | 47% | 1,213 | 43.3% | 1,531 | 54.7% | 53 | 1.9% | 4 | 0.1% | -318 | 2,801 | ||||||||
Richmond | 27% | 844 | 40.7% | 1,194 | 57.5% | 36 | 1.7% | 2 | 0.1% | -350 | 2,076 | ||||||||
Richmond city | 29% | 38,963 | 75.7% | 10,750 | 20.9% | 1,691 | 3.3% | 33 | 0.1% | 28,213 | 51,437 | ||||||||
Roanoke | 41% | 11,605 | 37.9% | 18,166 | 59.3% | 817 | 2.7% | 26 | 0.1% | -6,561 | 30,614 | ||||||||
Roanoke city | 27% | 12,311 | 59.3% | 7,714 | 37.2% | 720 | 3.5% | 19 | 0.1% | 4,597 | 20,764 | ||||||||
Rockbridge | 36% | 2,713 | 41.3% | 3,696 | 56.3% | 153 | 2.3% | 1 | 0.0% | -983 | 6,563 | ||||||||
Rockingham | 34% | 5,323 | 25.8% | 14,744 | 71.5% | 540 | 2.6% | 19 | 0.1% | -9,421 | 20,626 | ||||||||
Russell | 29% | 2,442 | 37.6% | 3,947 | 60.7% | 108 | 1.7% | 4 | 0.1% | -1,505 | 6,501 | ||||||||
Salem city | 34% | 2,750 | 40.0% | 3,914 | 56.9% | 210 | 3.1% | 2 | 0.0% | -1,164 | 6,876 | ||||||||
Scott | 28% | 1,406 | 27.1% | 3,699 | 71.4% | 70 | 1.4% | 4 | 0.1% | -2,293 | 5,179 | ||||||||
Shenandoah | 33% | 3,219 | 29.0% | 7,624 | 68.7% | 238 | 2.1% | 11 | 0.1% | -4,405 | 11,092 | ||||||||
Smyth | 28% | 2,405 | 35.1% | 4,296 | 62.7% | 148 | 2.2% | 6 | 0.1% | -1,891 | 6,855 | ||||||||
Southampton | 35% | 2,377 | 47.0% | 2,594 | 51.2% | 88 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.1% | -217 | 5,062 | ||||||||
Spotsylvania | 34% | 12,381 | 38.0% | 19,445 | 59.7% | 732 | 2.2% | 26 | 0.1% | -7,064 | 32,584 | ||||||||
Stafford | 33% | 13,436 | 39.5% | 19,790 | 58.2% | 729 | 2.1% | 34 | 0.1% | -6,354 | 33,989 | ||||||||
Staunton city | 31% | 3,010 | 48.3% | 3,045 | 48.8% | 175 | 2.8% | 7 | 0.1% | -35 | 6,237 | ||||||||
Suffolk city | 37% | 13,533 | 56.0% | 10,202 | 42.2% | 435 | 1.8% | 17 | 0.1% | 3,331 | 24,187 | ||||||||
Surry | 47% | 1,545 | 60.1% | 963 | 37.5% | 61 | 2.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 582 | 2,569 | ||||||||
Sussex | 31% | 1,710 | 57.2% | 1,241 | 41.5% | 36 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 469 | 2,987 | ||||||||
Tazewell | 28% | 2,574 | 26.6% | 6,972 | 72.1% | 119 | 1.2% | 8 | 0.1% | -4,398 | 9,673 | ||||||||
Virginia Beach city | 31% | 49,218 | 46.1% | 54,602 | 51.2% | 2,863 | 2.7% | 61 | 0.1% | -5,384 | 106,744 | ||||||||
Warren | 31% | 3,048 | 33.0% | 5,933 | 64.2% | 231 | 2.5% | 25 | 0.3% | -2,885 | 9,237 | ||||||||
Washington | 32% | 4,402 | 31.4% | 9,361 | 66.8% | 235 | 1.7% | 17 | 0.1% | -4,959 | 14,015 | ||||||||
Waynesboro city | 29% | 1,951 | 40.5% | 2,675 | 55.6% | 184 | 3.8% | 2 | 0.0% | -724 | 4,812 | ||||||||
Westmoreland | 32% | 2,217 | 47.6% | 2,338 | 50.2% | 93 | 2.0% | 6 | 0.1% | -121 | 4,654 | ||||||||
Williamsburg city | 30% | 2,466 | 63.0% | 1,360 | 34.7% | 88 | 2.2% | 3 | 0.1% | 1,106 | 3,917 | ||||||||
Winchester city | 28% | 2,732 | 46.1% | 2,985 | 50.4% | 195 | 3.3% | 9 | 0.2% | -253 | 5,921 | ||||||||
Wise | 25% | 2,181 | 28.2% | 5,414 | 70.1% | 125 | 1.6% | 3 | 0.0% | -3,233 | 7,723 | ||||||||
Wythe | 31% | 2,393 | 33.5% | 4,562 | 63.9% | 177 | 2.5% | 10 | 0.1% | -2,169 | 7,142 | ||||||||
York | 41% | 7,974 | 38.7% | 12,141 | 58.9% | 493 | 2.4% | 17 | 0.1% | -4,167 | 20,625 | ||||||||
TOTAL | 34% | 1,073,667 | 49.1% | 1,055,940 | 48.3% | 53,102 | 2.4% | 1,764 | 0.1% | 17,727 | 2,184,473 | ||||||||
Total R vote: 1,055,940 (48.3%) Total D vote: 1,073,667 (49.1%) Total Other vote: 54,866 (2.5%) | |||||||||||||||||||
* incumbent | |||||||||||||||||||
Campaign finance data for this election**: | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Disbursements: | $18,112,444 | $7,875,545 | $84,949 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Receipts: | $17,096,880 | $7,894,669 | $84,688 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash on Hand: | $132,005 | $19,123 | $-261 | ||||||||||||||||
Contributions by Candidate: | $63,275 | $27,728 | $46,354 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans by Candidate: | $0 | $990,000 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Individual Contributions: | $12,381,210 | $6,062,299 | $32,860 | ||||||||||||||||
Party Contributions: | $0 | $50,400 | $1,450 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Committee Contributions: | $3,922,820 | $670,906 | $3,350 | ||||||||||||||||
Transfers from Other Committees: | $638,367 | $83,147 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Supporting: | $91,635 | $407,574 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Opposing: | $425,350 | $1,844,229 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Independent Expenditures: | $-333,715 | $-1,436,655 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Spending: | $17,778,729 | $6,438,890 | $84,949 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
|
2014 Senate class 2, Accomack County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 4,137 | 42.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,259 | 54.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 256 | 2.7% |
TOTAL | 9,658 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Albemarle County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 17,924 | 54.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 13,930 | 42.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 1,170 | 3.5% |
TOTAL | 33,040 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Alexandria city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 29,047 | 70.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 11,480 | 27.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 859 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 41,431 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Alleghany County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,211 | 53.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,835 | 44.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 105 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 4,155 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Amelia County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,377 | 33.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,588 | 63.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 100 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 4,068 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Amherst County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,243 | 36.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,370 | 61.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 183 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 8,798 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Appomattox County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,399 | 29.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,234 | 68.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 98 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 4,736 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Arlington County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 47,709 | 70.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 18,239 | 26.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 1,660 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 67,683 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Augusta County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 5,153 | 26.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 14,011 | 71.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 544 | 2.8% |
TOTAL | 19,733 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Bath County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 489 | 41.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 638 | 54.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 44 | 3.8% |
TOTAL | 1,171 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Bedford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 6,855 | 27.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 17,280 | 69.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 568 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 24,711 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Bland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 514 | 28.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,266 | 69.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 38 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 1,820 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Botetourt County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,488 | 31.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 7,296 | 65.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 285 | 2.6% |
TOTAL | 11,077 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Bristol city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,294 | 34.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,445 | 64.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 64 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 3,806 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Brunswick County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,675 | 60.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,692 | 38.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 48 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 4,415 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Buchanan County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,794 | 38.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,794 | 60.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 43 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 4,635 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Buckingham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,785 | 45.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,015 | 51.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 105 | 2.7% |
TOTAL | 3,910 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Buena Vista city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 475 | 39.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 692 | 57.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 38 | 3.2% |
TOTAL | 1,206 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Campbell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 4,428 | 28.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 10,761 | 69.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 291 | 1.9% |
TOTAL | 15,494 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Caroline County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,879 | 51.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,517 | 46.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 174 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 7,576 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Carroll County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,265 | 32.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,587 | 65.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 194 | 2.8% |
TOTAL | 7,054 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Charles City County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,593 | 64.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 834 | 33.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 48 | 1.9% |
TOTAL | 2,478 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Charlotte County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,462 | 40.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,062 | 57.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 50 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 3,574 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Charlottesville city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 8,241 | 76.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,054 | 19.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 413 | 3.9% |
TOTAL | 10,719 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Chesapeake city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 29,602 | 48.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 29,899 | 49.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 1,214 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 60,763 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Chesterfield County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 44,491 | 44.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 53,306 | 52.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 3,272 | 3.2% |
TOTAL | 101,132 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Clarke County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,954 | 39.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,893 | 57.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 143 | 2.9% |
TOTAL | 4,993 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Colonial Heights city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,187 | 25.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,351 | 71.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 139 | 3.0% |
TOTAL | 4,679 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Covington city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 731 | 60.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 457 | 37.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 24 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 1,213 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Craig County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 559 | 34.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,011 | 62.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 49 | 3.0% |
TOTAL | 1,621 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Culpeper County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,823 | 32.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 7,487 | 64.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 303 | 2.6% |
TOTAL | 11,621 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Cumberland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,228 | 44.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,451 | 52.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 93 | 3.4% |
TOTAL | 2,776 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Danville city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 6,259 | 57.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,436 | 41.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 114 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 10,812 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Dickenson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,416 | 41.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,897 | 56.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 40 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 3,376 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Dinwiddie County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,467 | 47.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,694 | 50.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 146 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 7,323 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Emporia city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 855 | 62.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 501 | 36.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 16 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 1,373 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Essex County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,419 | 47.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,545 | 51.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 57 | 1.9% |
TOTAL | 3,022 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Fairfax County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 176,418 | 57.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 122,857 | 40.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 6,329 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 305,869 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Fairfax city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,812 | 54.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,018 | 43.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 160 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 6,993 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Falls Church city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,599 | 71.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,309 | 26.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 123 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 5,034 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Fauquier County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 6,985 | 33.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 13,219 | 64.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 405 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 20,615 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Floyd County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,889 | 40.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,558 | 55.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 163 | 3.5% |
TOTAL | 4,621 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Fluvanna County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,563 | 42.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,480 | 53.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 274 | 3.3% |
TOTAL | 8,325 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Franklin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 5,650 | 35.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 9,664 | 61.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 408 | 2.6% |
TOTAL | 15,729 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Franklin city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,328 | 61.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 818 | 37.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 29 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 2,175 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Frederick County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 6,659 | 30.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 14,693 | 66.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 556 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 21,953 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Fredericksburg city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,341 | 58.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,211 | 38.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 164 | 2.9% |
TOTAL | 5,721 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Galax city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 564 | 42.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 743 | 55.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 29 | 2.2% |
TOTAL | 1,340 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Giles County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,760 | 37.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,856 | 60.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 140 | 2.9% |
TOTAL | 4,760 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Gloucester County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,729 | 33.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 6,988 | 63.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 278 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 10,996 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Goochland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,381 | 36.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,735 | 61.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 235 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 9,356 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Grayson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,441 | 34.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,585 | 62.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 109 | 2.6% |
TOTAL | 4,146 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Greene County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,655 | 32.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,223 | 63.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 190 | 3.7% |
TOTAL | 5,072 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Greensville County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,738 | 63.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 984 | 35.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 37 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 2,760 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Halifax County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 4,435 | 46.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,005 | 52.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 153 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 9,599 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Hampton city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 23,483 | 68.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 10,149 | 29.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 673 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 34,329 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Hanover County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 12,437 | 32.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 24,995 | 64.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 1,239 | 3.2% |
TOTAL | 38,705 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Harrisonburg city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,865 | 51.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,332 | 44.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 338 | 4.5% |
TOTAL | 7,539 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Henrico County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 54,049 | 55.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 41,171 | 42.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 2,822 | 2.9% |
TOTAL | 98,133 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Henry County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 5,695 | 42.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 7,549 | 56.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 242 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 13,488 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Highland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 318 | 34.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 564 | 61.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 37 | 4.0% |
TOTAL | 919 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Hopewell city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,412 | 50.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,197 | 46.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 134 | 2.8% |
TOTAL | 4,748 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Isle of Wight County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 4,979 | 41.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 6,714 | 56.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 233 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 11,935 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, James City County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 11,577 | 43.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 14,403 | 54.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 474 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 26,482 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, King and Queen County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,012 | 47.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,067 | 49.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 59 | 2.8% |
TOTAL | 2,138 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, King George County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,460 | 36.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,148 | 61.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 171 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 6,783 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, King William County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,797 | 34.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,168 | 61.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 181 | 3.5% |
TOTAL | 5,150 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Lancaster County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,924 | 41.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,573 | 56.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 91 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 4,593 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Lee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,030 | 34.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,690 | 63.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 88 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 5,812 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Lexington city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 981 | 64.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 501 | 33.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 33 | 2.2% |
TOTAL | 1,518 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Loudoun County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 45,042 | 48.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 45,500 | 49.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 2,081 | 2.2% |
TOTAL | 92,698 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Louisa County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,936 | 39.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,802 | 57.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 333 | 3.3% |
TOTAL | 10,075 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Lunenburg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,481 | 45.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,736 | 52.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 67 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 3,285 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Lynchburg city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 8,284 | 42.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 10,627 | 54.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 461 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 19,395 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Madison County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,418 | 34.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,560 | 62.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 102 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 4,083 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Manassas city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 4,004 | 49.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,891 | 47.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 240 | 2.9% |
TOTAL | 8,141 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Manassas Park city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,107 | 52.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 924 | 44.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 64 | 3.1% |
TOTAL | 2,097 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Martinsville city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,146 | 60.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,317 | 37.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 75 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 3,544 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Mathews County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,208 | 35.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,141 | 63.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 52 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 3,401 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Mecklenburg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,266 | 42.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,375 | 56.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 128 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 7,769 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Middlesex County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,427 | 37.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,304 | 60.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 91 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 3,823 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Montgomery County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 11,110 | 51.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 9,776 | 44.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 871 | 4.0% |
TOTAL | 21,766 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Nelson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,496 | 49.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,288 | 45.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 289 | 5.7% |
TOTAL | 5,076 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, New Kent County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,303 | 32.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,668 | 65.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 195 | 2.7% |
TOTAL | 7,176 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Newport News city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 23,405 | 60.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 14,548 | 37.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 791 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 38,770 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Norfolk city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 29,210 | 68.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 12,252 | 28.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 1,043 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 42,543 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Northampton County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,890 | 52.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,553 | 43.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 127 | 3.6% |
TOTAL | 3,571 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Northumberland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,089 | 40.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,939 | 57.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 99 | 1.9% |
TOTAL | 5,128 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Norton city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 294 | 37.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 462 | 59.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 26 | 3.3% |
TOTAL | 782 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Nottoway County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,796 | 47.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,942 | 50.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 79 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 3,820 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Orange County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,629 | 37.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,814 | 59.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 247 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 9,699 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Page County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,654 | 29.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,883 | 68.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 101 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 5,640 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Patrick County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,538 | 31.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,228 | 66.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 117 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 4,885 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Petersburg city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 6,800 | 87.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 843 | 10.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 97 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 7,748 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Pittsylvania County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 6,558 | 36.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 11,278 | 62.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 250 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 18,095 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Poquoson city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,077 | 25.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,128 | 72.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 99 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 4,305 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Portsmouth city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 17,101 | 69.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 6,760 | 27.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 574 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 24,452 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Powhatan County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,525 | 26.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 6,785 | 70.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 375 | 3.9% |
TOTAL | 9,686 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Prince Edward County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,550 | 52.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,194 | 45.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 122 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 4,867 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Prince George County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,700 | 40.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,132 | 56.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 243 | 2.7% |
TOTAL | 9,081 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Prince William County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 48,140 | 50.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 45,366 | 47.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 1,955 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 95,528 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Pulaski County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,301 | 39.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,796 | 57.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 198 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 8,303 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Radford city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,446 | 51.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,256 | 45.0% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 82 | 2.9% |
TOTAL | 2,791 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Rappahannock County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,213 | 43.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,531 | 54.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 53 | 1.9% |
TOTAL | 2,801 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Richmond County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 844 | 40.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,194 | 57.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 36 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 2,076 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Richmond city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 38,963 | 75.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 10,750 | 20.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 1,691 | 3.3% |
TOTAL | 51,437 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Roanoke County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 11,605 | 37.9% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 18,166 | 59.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 817 | 2.7% |
TOTAL | 30,614 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Roanoke city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 12,311 | 59.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 7,714 | 37.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 720 | 3.5% |
TOTAL | 20,764 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Rockbridge County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,713 | 41.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,696 | 56.3% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 153 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 6,563 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Rockingham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 5,323 | 25.8% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 14,744 | 71.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 540 | 2.6% |
TOTAL | 20,626 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Russell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,442 | 37.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,947 | 60.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 108 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 6,501 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Salem city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,750 | 40.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,914 | 56.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 210 | 3.1% |
TOTAL | 6,876 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Scott County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,406 | 27.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,699 | 71.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 70 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 5,179 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Shenandoah County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,219 | 29.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 7,624 | 68.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 238 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 11,092 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Smyth County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,405 | 35.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,296 | 62.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 148 | 2.2% |
TOTAL | 6,855 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Southampton County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,377 | 47.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,594 | 51.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 88 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 5,062 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Spotsylvania County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 12,381 | 38.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 19,445 | 59.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 732 | 2.2% |
TOTAL | 32,584 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Stafford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 13,436 | 39.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 19,790 | 58.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 729 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 33,989 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Staunton city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,010 | 48.3% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 3,045 | 48.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 175 | 2.8% |
TOTAL | 6,237 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Suffolk city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 13,533 | 56.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 10,202 | 42.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 435 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 24,187 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Surry County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,545 | 60.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 963 | 37.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 61 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 2,569 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Sussex County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,710 | 57.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,241 | 41.5% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 36 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 2,987 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Tazewell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,574 | 26.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 6,972 | 72.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 119 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 9,673 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Virginia Beach city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 49,218 | 46.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 54,602 | 51.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 2,863 | 2.7% |
TOTAL | 106,744 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Warren County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 3,048 | 33.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,933 | 64.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 231 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 9,237 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Washington County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 4,402 | 31.4% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 9,361 | 66.8% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 235 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 14,015 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Waynesboro city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 1,951 | 40.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,675 | 55.6% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 184 | 3.8% |
TOTAL | 4,812 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Westmoreland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,217 | 47.6% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,338 | 50.2% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 93 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 4,654 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Williamsburg city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,466 | 63.0% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 1,360 | 34.7% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 88 | 2.2% |
TOTAL | 3,917 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Winchester city | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,732 | 46.1% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 2,985 | 50.4% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 195 | 3.3% |
TOTAL | 5,921 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Wise County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,181 | 28.2% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 5,414 | 70.1% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 125 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 7,723 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, Wythe County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 2,393 | 33.5% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 4,562 | 63.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 177 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 7,142 | ||||||||
|
2014 Senate class 2, York County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mark Warner* (D) | 7,974 | 38.7% | Ed Gillespie (R) | 12,141 | 58.9% | Robert Sarvis (Lbt) | 493 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 20,625 | ||||||||
|
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Mark Warner* | |
Total Disbursements: | $18,112,444 |
Total Receipts: | $17,096,880 |
Cash on Hand: | $132,005 |
Candidate Contributions: | $63,275 |
Candidate Loans: | $0 |
Individual Contributions: | $12,381,210 |
Party Contributions: | $0 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $3,922,820 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $638,367 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $91,635 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $425,350 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $-333,715 |
Net Spending: | $17,778,729 |
Ed Gillespie | |
Total Disbursements: | $7,875,545 |
Total Receipts: | $7,894,669 |
Cash on Hand: | $19,123 |
Candidate Contributions: | $27,728 |
Candidate Loans: | $990,000 |
Individual Contributions: | $6,062,299 |
Party Contributions: | $50,400 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $670,906 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $83,147 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $407,574 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $1,844,229 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $-1,436,655 |
Net Spending: | $6,438,890 |
Robert Sarvis | |
Total Disbursements: | $84,949 |
Total Receipts: | $84,688 |
Cash on Hand: | $-261 |
Candidate Contributions: | $46,354 |
Candidate Loans: | $0 |
Individual Contributions: | $32,860 |
Party Contributions: | $1,450 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $3,350 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $0 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $0 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $0 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $0 |
Net Spending: | $84,949 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
Source: https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/senate/VA/2014
Republican Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
No Republican primary |
Democrat Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
No Democrat primary |