County | Turnout | Ernest Hollings* (D) |
Thomas Hartnett (R) |
Mark Johnson (Libertarian) |
Robert Clarkson (American) |
Other | Margin | TOTAL | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abbeville | 43% | 4,821 | 61.5% | 2,869 | 36.6% | 84 | 1.1% | 70 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,952 | 7,844 | ||||||
Aiken | 51% | 20,934 | 44.9% | 23,923 | 51.3% | 1,237 | 2.7% | 427 | 0.9% | 85 | 0.2% | -2,989 | 46,606 | ||||||
Allendale | 41% | 2,416 | 71.5% | 880 | 26.1% | 41 | 1.2% | 39 | 1.2% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,536 | 3,377 | ||||||
Anderson | 43% | 21,485 | 45.0% | 24,864 | 52.1% | 941 | 2.0% | 447 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | -3,379 | 47,737 | ||||||
Bamberg | 46% | 3,959 | 70.8% | 1,536 | 27.5% | 45 | 0.8% | 49 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,423 | 5,589 | ||||||
Barnwell | 54% | 4,457 | 56.2% | 3,252 | 41.0% | 115 | 1.5% | 103 | 1.3% | 4 | 0.1% | 1,205 | 7,931 | ||||||
Beaufort | 44% | 13,479 | 43.3% | 16,681 | 53.6% | 603 | 1.9% | 370 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | -3,202 | 31,133 | ||||||
Berkeley | 39% | 16,471 | 47.4% | 17,264 | 49.7% | 514 | 1.5% | 481 | 1.4% | 25 | 0.1% | -793 | 34,755 | ||||||
Calhoun | 57% | 3,305 | 60.2% | 2,049 | 37.3% | 110 | 2.0% | 23 | 0.4% | 5 | 0.1% | 1,256 | 5,492 | ||||||
Charleston | 43% | 50,923 | 53.2% | 42,400 | 44.3% | 1,398 | 1.5% | 977 | 1.0% | 74 | 0.1% | 8,523 | 95,772 | ||||||
Cherokee | 43% | 7,563 | 51.5% | 6,698 | 45.6% | 256 | 1.7% | 155 | 1.1% | 2 | 0.0% | 865 | 14,674 | ||||||
Chester | 44% | 6,184 | 60.4% | 3,713 | 36.3% | 162 | 1.6% | 179 | 1.7% | 1 | 0.0% | 2,471 | 10,239 | ||||||
Chesterfield | 39% | 6,510 | 57.8% | 4,500 | 40.0% | 135 | 1.2% | 96 | 0.9% | 13 | 0.1% | 2,010 | 11,254 | ||||||
Clarendon | 53% | 6,869 | 62.2% | 4,005 | 36.3% | 105 | 1.0% | 54 | 0.5% | 11 | 0.1% | 2,864 | 11,044 | ||||||
Colleton | 44% | 6,265 | 56.6% | 4,558 | 41.2% | 145 | 1.3% | 107 | 1.0% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,707 | 11,076 | ||||||
Darlington | 41% | 10,148 | 53.9% | 7,993 | 42.4% | 324 | 1.7% | 369 | 2.0% | 3 | 0.0% | 2,155 | 18,837 | ||||||
Dillon | 45% | 5,838 | 64.3% | 3,108 | 34.3% | 73 | 0.8% | 54 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,730 | 9,073 | ||||||
Dorchester | 44% | 12,158 | 45.4% | 13,958 | 52.1% | 338 | 1.3% | 320 | 1.2% | 30 | 0.1% | -1,800 | 26,804 | ||||||
Edgefield | 50% | 4,150 | 58.3% | 2,818 | 39.6% | 93 | 1.3% | 58 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,332 | 7,119 | ||||||
Fairfield | 48% | 5,410 | 69.3% | 2,178 | 27.9% | 128 | 1.6% | 90 | 1.2% | 6 | 0.1% | 3,232 | 7,812 | ||||||
Florence | 47% | 19,517 | 49.5% | 19,158 | 48.6% | 511 | 1.3% | 243 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 359 | 39,429 | ||||||
Georgetown | 49% | 9,184 | 55.1% | 7,086 | 42.5% | 257 | 1.5% | 129 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,098 | 16,656 | ||||||
Greenville | 46% | 45,761 | 39.9% | 65,508 | 57.1% | 2,484 | 2.2% | 779 | 0.7% | 132 | 0.1% | -19,747 | 114,664 | ||||||
Greenwood | 41% | 8,894 | 48.7% | 8,852 | 48.4% | 318 | 1.7% | 209 | 1.1% | 7 | 0.0% | 42 | 18,280 | ||||||
Hampton | 52% | 4,484 | 65.9% | 2,186 | 32.1% | 58 | 0.9% | 74 | 1.1% | 5 | 0.1% | 2,298 | 6,807 | ||||||
Horry | 40% | 22,058 | 45.9% | 24,133 | 50.3% | 1,149 | 2.4% | 653 | 1.4% | 18 | 0.0% | -2,075 | 48,011 | ||||||
Jasper | 48% | 3,414 | 62.1% | 1,964 | 35.7% | 60 | 1.1% | 61 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,450 | 5,500 | ||||||
Kershaw | 53% | 8,635 | 49.2% | 8,238 | 47.0% | 433 | 2.5% | 184 | 1.0% | 45 | 0.3% | 397 | 17,535 | ||||||
Lancaster | 44% | 9,613 | 53.4% | 7,931 | 44.1% | 281 | 1.6% | 161 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,682 | 17,986 | ||||||
Laurens | 37% | 9,081 | 54.9% | 7,161 | 43.3% | 163 | 1.0% | 111 | 0.7% | 10 | 0.1% | 1,920 | 16,526 | ||||||
Lee | 56% | 5,147 | 69.7% | 2,164 | 29.3% | 42 | 0.6% | 36 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,983 | 7,389 | ||||||
Lexington | 53% | 26,194 | 37.7% | 39,712 | 57.2% | 2,843 | 4.1% | 663 | 1.0% | 23 | 0.0% | -13,518 | 69,435 | ||||||
Marion | 42% | 6,340 | 63.6% | 3,454 | 34.7% | 85 | 0.9% | 88 | 0.9% | 1 | 0.0% | 2,886 | 9,968 | ||||||
Marlboro | 38% | 5,786 | 72.4% | 2,021 | 25.3% | 98 | 1.2% | 79 | 1.0% | 3 | 0.0% | 3,765 | 7,987 | ||||||
McCormick | 42% | 2,110 | 72.6% | 752 | 25.9% | 29 | 1.0% | 17 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,358 | 2,908 | ||||||
Newberry | 47% | 6,202 | 51.8% | 5,362 | 44.8% | 288 | 2.4% | 128 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.0% | 840 | 11,981 | ||||||
Oconee | 46% | 8,840 | 42.6% | 11,123 | 53.6% | 506 | 2.4% | 282 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.0% | -2,283 | 20,752 | ||||||
Orangeburg | 52% | 21,365 | 65.9% | 10,318 | 31.8% | 352 | 1.1% | 227 | 0.7% | 159 | 0.5% | 11,047 | 32,421 | ||||||
Pickens | 39% | 11,722 | 39.8% | 16,583 | 56.3% | 796 | 2.7% | 369 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -4,861 | 29,470 | ||||||
Richland | 46% | 58,841 | 58.2% | 39,118 | 38.7% | 2,254 | 2.2% | 865 | 0.9% | 7 | 0.0% | 19,723 | 101,085 | ||||||
Saluda | 49% | 3,265 | 52.8% | 2,693 | 43.6% | 148 | 2.4% | 67 | 1.1% | 7 | 0.1% | 572 | 6,180 | ||||||
Spartanburg | 40% | 32,594 | 46.3% | 35,500 | 50.4% | 1,573 | 2.2% | 741 | 1.1% | 20 | 0.0% | -2,906 | 70,428 | ||||||
Sumter | 38% | 14,877 | 53.7% | 12,176 | 44.0% | 402 | 1.5% | 232 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.0% | 2,701 | 27,689 | ||||||
Union | 48% | 6,197 | 56.8% | 4,459 | 40.9% | 162 | 1.5% | 85 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,738 | 10,903 | ||||||
Williamsburg | 52% | 8,593 | 64.9% | 4,492 | 33.9% | 68 | 0.5% | 85 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 4,101 | 13,238 | ||||||
York | 42% | 18,971 | 44.1% | 22,784 | 52.9% | 755 | 1.8% | 532 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | -3,813 | 43,042 | ||||||
TOTAL | 45% | 591,030 | 50.1% | 554,175 | 46.9% | 22,962 | 1.9% | 11,568 | 1.0% | 703 | 0.1% | 36,855 | 1,180,438 | ||||||
Total R vote: 554,175 (46.9%) Total D vote: 591,030 (50.1%) Total Other vote: 35,233 (3.0%) | |||||||||||||||||||
* incumbent | |||||||||||||||||||
Campaign finance data for this election**: | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Disbursements: | $4,188,829 | $886,816 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Total Receipts: | $4,016,311 | $907,376 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Cash on Hand: | $25,336 | $20,869 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions by Candidate: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Loans by Candidate: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Total Individual Contributions: | $2,151,479 | $685,808 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Party Contributions: | $17,500 | $56,520 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Other Committee Contributions: | $1,629,671 | $153,311 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Transfers from Other Committees: | $0 | $5,048 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Supporting: | $24 | $14,559 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Opposing: | $267 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Net Independent Expenditures: | $-243 | $14,559 | $0 | $0 | |||||||||||||||
Net Spending: | $4,188,586 | $901,375 | $0 | $0 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
|
1992 Senate class 3, Abbeville County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 4,821 | 61.5% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,869 | 36.6% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 84 | 1.1% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 70 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 7,844 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Aiken County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 20,934 | 44.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 23,923 | 51.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 1,237 | 2.7% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 427 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 46,606 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Allendale County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 2,416 | 71.5% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 880 | 26.1% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 41 | 1.2% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 39 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 3,377 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Anderson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 21,485 | 45.0% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 24,864 | 52.1% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 941 | 2.0% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 447 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 47,737 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Bamberg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 3,959 | 70.8% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 1,536 | 27.5% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 45 | 0.8% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 49 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 5,589 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Barnwell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 4,457 | 56.2% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 3,252 | 41.0% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 115 | 1.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 103 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 7,931 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Beaufort County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 13,479 | 43.3% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 16,681 | 53.6% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 603 | 1.9% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 370 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 31,133 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Berkeley County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 16,471 | 47.4% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 17,264 | 49.7% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 514 | 1.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 481 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 34,755 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Calhoun County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 3,305 | 60.2% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,049 | 37.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 110 | 2.0% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 23 | 0.4% |
TOTAL | 5,492 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Charleston County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 50,923 | 53.2% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 42,400 | 44.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 1,398 | 1.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 977 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 95,772 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Cherokee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 7,563 | 51.5% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 6,698 | 45.6% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 256 | 1.7% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 155 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 14,674 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Chester County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 6,184 | 60.4% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 3,713 | 36.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 162 | 1.6% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 179 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 10,239 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Chesterfield County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 6,510 | 57.8% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 4,500 | 40.0% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 135 | 1.2% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 96 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 11,254 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Clarendon County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 6,869 | 62.2% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 4,005 | 36.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 105 | 1.0% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 54 | 0.5% |
TOTAL | 11,044 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Colleton County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 6,265 | 56.6% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 4,558 | 41.2% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 145 | 1.3% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 107 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 11,076 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Darlington County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 10,148 | 53.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 7,993 | 42.4% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 324 | 1.7% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 369 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 18,837 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Dillon County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 5,838 | 64.3% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 3,108 | 34.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 73 | 0.8% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 54 | 0.6% |
TOTAL | 9,073 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Dorchester County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 12,158 | 45.4% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 13,958 | 52.1% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 338 | 1.3% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 320 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 26,804 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Edgefield County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 4,150 | 58.3% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,818 | 39.6% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 93 | 1.3% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 58 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 7,119 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Fairfield County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 5,410 | 69.3% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,178 | 27.9% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 128 | 1.6% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 90 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 7,812 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Florence County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 19,517 | 49.5% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 19,158 | 48.6% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 511 | 1.3% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 243 | 0.6% |
TOTAL | 39,429 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Georgetown County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 9,184 | 55.1% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 7,086 | 42.5% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 257 | 1.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 129 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 16,656 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Greenville County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 45,761 | 39.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 65,508 | 57.1% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 2,484 | 2.2% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 779 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 114,664 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Greenwood County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 8,894 | 48.7% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 8,852 | 48.4% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 318 | 1.7% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 209 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 18,280 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Hampton County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 4,484 | 65.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,186 | 32.1% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 58 | 0.9% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 74 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 6,807 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Horry County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 22,058 | 45.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 24,133 | 50.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 1,149 | 2.4% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 653 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 48,011 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Jasper County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 3,414 | 62.1% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 1,964 | 35.7% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 60 | 1.1% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 61 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 5,500 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Kershaw County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 8,635 | 49.2% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 8,238 | 47.0% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 433 | 2.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 184 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 17,535 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Lancaster County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 9,613 | 53.4% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 7,931 | 44.1% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 281 | 1.6% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 161 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 17,986 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Laurens County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 9,081 | 54.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 7,161 | 43.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 163 | 1.0% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 111 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 16,526 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Lee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 5,147 | 69.7% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,164 | 29.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 42 | 0.6% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 36 | 0.5% |
TOTAL | 7,389 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Lexington County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 26,194 | 37.7% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 39,712 | 57.2% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 2,843 | 4.1% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 663 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 69,435 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Marion County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 6,340 | 63.6% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 3,454 | 34.7% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 85 | 0.9% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 88 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 9,968 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Marlboro County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 5,786 | 72.4% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,021 | 25.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 98 | 1.2% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 79 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 7,987 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, McCormick County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 2,110 | 72.6% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 752 | 25.9% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 29 | 1.0% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 17 | 0.6% |
TOTAL | 2,908 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Newberry County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 6,202 | 51.8% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 5,362 | 44.8% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 288 | 2.4% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 128 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 11,981 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Oconee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 8,840 | 42.6% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 11,123 | 53.6% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 506 | 2.4% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 282 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 20,752 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Orangeburg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 21,365 | 65.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 10,318 | 31.8% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 352 | 1.1% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 227 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 32,421 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Pickens County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 11,722 | 39.8% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 16,583 | 56.3% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 796 | 2.7% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 369 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 29,470 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Richland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 58,841 | 58.2% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 39,118 | 38.7% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 2,254 | 2.2% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 865 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 101,085 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Saluda County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 3,265 | 52.8% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 2,693 | 43.6% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 148 | 2.4% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 67 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 6,180 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Spartanburg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 32,594 | 46.3% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 35,500 | 50.4% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 1,573 | 2.2% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 741 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 70,428 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Sumter County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 14,877 | 53.7% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 12,176 | 44.0% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 402 | 1.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 232 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 27,689 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Union County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 6,197 | 56.8% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 4,459 | 40.9% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 162 | 1.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 85 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 10,903 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, Williamsburg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 8,593 | 64.9% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 4,492 | 33.9% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 68 | 0.5% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 85 | 0.6% |
TOTAL | 13,238 | ||||||||
|
1992 Senate class 3, York County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Ernest Hollings* (D) | 18,971 | 44.1% | Thomas Hartnett (R) | 22,784 | 52.9% | Mark Johnson (Lbt) | 755 | 1.8% | Robert Clarkson (Amer) | 532 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 43,042 | ||||||||
|
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Ernest Hollings* | |
Total Disbursements: | $4,188,829 |
Total Receipts: | $4,016,311 |
Cash on Hand: | $25,336 |
Candidate Contributions: | $0 |
Candidate Loans: | $0 |
Individual Contributions: | $2,151,479 |
Party Contributions: | $17,500 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $1,629,671 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $0 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $24 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $267 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $-243 |
Net Spending: | $4,188,586 |
Thomas Hartnett | |
Total Disbursements: | $886,816 |
Total Receipts: | $907,376 |
Cash on Hand: | $20,869 |
Candidate Contributions: | $0 |
Candidate Loans: | $0 |
Individual Contributions: | $685,808 |
Party Contributions: | $56,520 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $153,311 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $5,048 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $14,559 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $0 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $14,559 |
Net Spending: | $901,375 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
Source: https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/senate/SC/1992
Republican Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
1 | Thomas Hartnett | 123,572 | 76.8% | $886,816 |
2 | Charlie Thompson | 37,352 | 23.2% | $23,124 |
TOTAL VOTES | 160,924 |
Democrat Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
No Democrat primary |