County | Turnout | Richard Burr (R) |
Erskine Bowles (D) |
Tom Bailey (Libertarian) |
Other | Margin | TOTAL | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alamance | 51% | 30,614 | 56.8% | 22,580 | 41.9% | 714 | 1.3% | 4 | 0.0% | 8,034 | 53,912 | ||||||||
Alexander | 59% | 10,073 | 64.1% | 5,430 | 34.5% | 222 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 4,643 | 15,725 | ||||||||
Alleghany | 54% | 2,754 | 58.3% | 1,908 | 40.4% | 64 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.0% | 846 | 4,727 | ||||||||
Anson | 47% | 3,367 | 36.6% | 5,734 | 62.4% | 91 | 1.0% | 1 | 0.0% | -2,367 | 9,193 | ||||||||
Ashe | 58% | 7,021 | 59.3% | 4,651 | 39.3% | 174 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,370 | 11,846 | ||||||||
Avery | 51% | 5,157 | 71.3% | 1,917 | 26.5% | 161 | 2.2% | 1 | 0.0% | 3,240 | 7,236 | ||||||||
Beaufort | 55% | 11,109 | 56.5% | 8,231 | 41.9% | 303 | 1.5% | 3 | 0.0% | 2,878 | 19,646 | ||||||||
Bertie | 51% | 2,640 | 33.3% | 5,227 | 66.0% | 54 | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0% | -2,587 | 7,921 | ||||||||
Bladen | 47% | 5,073 | 42.7% | 6,661 | 56.1% | 143 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,588 | 11,877 | ||||||||
Brunswick | 54% | 20,554 | 55.1% | 16,128 | 43.2% | 623 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 4,426 | 37,305 | ||||||||
Buncombe | 58% | 46,763 | 46.5% | 51,745 | 51.4% | 2,112 | 2.1% | 11 | 0.0% | -4,982 | 100,631 | ||||||||
Burke | 47% | 18,371 | 57.3% | 13,137 | 40.9% | 577 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 5,234 | 32,085 | ||||||||
Cabarrus | 55% | 37,494 | 61.7% | 22,206 | 36.5% | 1,068 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 15,288 | 60,768 | ||||||||
Caldwell | 51% | 19,612 | 62.7% | 11,079 | 35.4% | 566 | 1.8% | 11 | 0.0% | 8,533 | 31,268 | ||||||||
Camden | 61% | 2,083 | 56.0% | 1,576 | 42.4% | 62 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 507 | 3,721 | ||||||||
Carteret | 51% | 16,082 | 63.3% | 8,875 | 34.9% | 443 | 1.7% | 8 | 0.0% | 7,207 | 25,408 | ||||||||
Caswell | 51% | 4,559 | 48.5% | 4,737 | 50.4% | 104 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -178 | 9,400 | ||||||||
Catawba | 51% | 35,946 | 63.1% | 20,153 | 35.4% | 841 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 15,793 | 56,940 | ||||||||
Chatham | 60% | 11,816 | 45.9% | 13,601 | 52.8% | 333 | 1.3% | 1 | 0.0% | -1,785 | 25,751 | ||||||||
Cherokee | 52% | 6,426 | 60.9% | 3,966 | 37.6% | 155 | 1.5% | 1 | 0.0% | 2,460 | 10,548 | ||||||||
Chowan | 46% | 2,457 | 47.4% | 2,638 | 50.9% | 90 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | -181 | 5,185 | ||||||||
Clay | 61% | 2,896 | 61.1% | 1,749 | 36.9% | 98 | 2.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,147 | 4,743 | ||||||||
Cleveland | 51% | 20,324 | 54.6% | 16,342 | 43.9% | 532 | 1.4% | 2 | 0.0% | 3,982 | 37,200 | ||||||||
Columbus | 49% | 8,721 | 41.8% | 11,860 | 56.8% | 281 | 1.3% | 1 | 0.0% | -3,139 | 20,863 | ||||||||
Craven | 51% | 21,402 | 57.4% | 15,299 | 41.0% | 581 | 1.6% | 8 | 0.0% | 6,103 | 37,290 | ||||||||
Cumberland | 43% | 44,145 | 46.2% | 50,097 | 52.4% | 1,331 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | -5,952 | 95,573 | ||||||||
Currituck | 55% | 5,007 | 59.7% | 3,172 | 37.8% | 212 | 2.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,835 | 8,391 | ||||||||
Dare | 62% | 8,215 | 52.7% | 6,995 | 44.8% | 327 | 2.1% | 64 | 0.4% | 1,220 | 15,601 | ||||||||
Davidson | 51% | 38,913 | 65.5% | 19,530 | 32.9% | 952 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 19,383 | 59,395 | ||||||||
Davie | 58% | 11,861 | 71.4% | 4,505 | 27.1% | 223 | 1.3% | 15 | 0.1% | 7,356 | 16,604 | ||||||||
Duplin | 42% | 8,613 | 52.0% | 7,768 | 46.9% | 181 | 1.1% | 11 | 0.1% | 845 | 16,573 | ||||||||
Durham | 59% | 32,217 | 29.4% | 76,294 | 69.5% | 1,205 | 1.1% | 2 | 0.0% | -44,077 | 109,718 | ||||||||
Edgecombe | 51% | 7,072 | 33.5% | 13,822 | 65.5% | 195 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | -6,750 | 21,089 | ||||||||
Forsyth | 57% | 74,108 | 53.1% | 63,899 | 45.8% | 1,431 | 1.0% | 29 | 0.0% | 10,209 | 139,467 | ||||||||
Franklin | 53% | 10,421 | 49.8% | 10,197 | 48.8% | 295 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.0% | 224 | 20,914 | ||||||||
Gaston | 43% | 39,857 | 62.6% | 22,750 | 35.7% | 1,092 | 1.7% | 1 | 0.0% | 17,107 | 63,700 | ||||||||
Gates | 49% | 1,654 | 40.7% | 2,352 | 57.9% | 53 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -698 | 4,059 | ||||||||
Graham | 58% | 2,267 | 60.1% | 1,445 | 38.3% | 62 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 822 | 3,774 | ||||||||
Granville | 45% | 8,447 | 45.7% | 9,806 | 53.1% | 214 | 1.2% | 1 | 0.0% | -1,359 | 18,468 | ||||||||
Greene | 43% | 3,400 | 52.4% | 3,043 | 46.9% | 49 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 357 | 6,492 | ||||||||
Guilford | 58% | 89,926 | 45.3% | 106,315 | 53.5% | 2,371 | 1.2% | 2 | 0.0% | -16,389 | 198,614 | ||||||||
Halifax | 47% | 7,110 | 36.0% | 12,457 | 63.1% | 162 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.0% | -5,347 | 19,731 | ||||||||
Harnett | 44% | 18,501 | 57.2% | 13,417 | 41.5% | 435 | 1.3% | 12 | 0.0% | 5,084 | 32,365 | ||||||||
Haywood | 58% | 12,949 | 49.5% | 12,710 | 48.6% | 477 | 1.8% | 5 | 0.0% | 239 | 26,141 | ||||||||
Henderson | 55% | 25,430 | 61.1% | 15,652 | 37.6% | 552 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 9,778 | 41,634 | ||||||||
Hertford | 45% | 2,478 | 31.0% | 5,428 | 68.0% | 76 | 1.0% | 4 | 0.1% | -2,950 | 7,986 | ||||||||
Hoke | 40% | 4,431 | 40.6% | 6,271 | 57.5% | 199 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,840 | 10,901 | ||||||||
Hyde | 47% | 1,060 | 48.1% | 1,118 | 50.7% | 28 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -58 | 2,206 | ||||||||
Iredell | 56% | 35,600 | 62.5% | 20,402 | 35.8% | 923 | 1.6% | 10 | 0.0% | 15,198 | 56,935 | ||||||||
Jackson | 48% | 6,656 | 47.2% | 7,220 | 51.2% | 228 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | -564 | 14,104 | ||||||||
Johnston | 52% | 33,334 | 61.9% | 19,966 | 37.1% | 563 | 1.0% | 13 | 0.0% | 13,368 | 53,876 | ||||||||
Jones | 58% | 2,392 | 52.7% | 2,092 | 46.1% | 52 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 300 | 4,536 | ||||||||
Lee | 50% | 10,218 | 52.7% | 8,900 | 45.9% | 252 | 1.3% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,318 | 19,371 | ||||||||
Lenoir | 51% | 11,707 | 51.2% | 11,012 | 48.2% | 141 | 0.6% | 4 | 0.0% | 695 | 22,864 | ||||||||
Lincoln | 56% | 18,422 | 62.2% | 10,657 | 36.0% | 556 | 1.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 7,765 | 29,635 | ||||||||
Macon | 57% | 8,399 | 58.1% | 5,896 | 40.8% | 159 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,503 | 14,454 | ||||||||
Madison | 57% | 4,490 | 49.2% | 4,479 | 49.1% | 149 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 11 | 9,118 | ||||||||
Martin | 55% | 4,615 | 44.0% | 5,779 | 55.1% | 97 | 0.9% | 1 | 0.0% | -1,164 | 10,492 | ||||||||
McDowell | 47% | 9,366 | 59.2% | 6,179 | 39.1% | 267 | 1.7% | 3 | 0.0% | 3,187 | 15,815 | ||||||||
Mecklenburg | 54% | 141,653 | 44.3% | 173,964 | 54.4% | 4,105 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -32,311 | 319,722 | ||||||||
Mitchell | 62% | 5,340 | 69.4% | 2,208 | 28.7% | 139 | 1.8% | 2 | 0.0% | 3,132 | 7,689 | ||||||||
Montgomery | 49% | 5,234 | 52.0% | 4,693 | 46.6% | 143 | 1.4% | 2 | 0.0% | 541 | 10,072 | ||||||||
Moore | 60% | 22,522 | 59.9% | 14,708 | 39.1% | 360 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 7,814 | 37,590 | ||||||||
Nash | 56% | 19,985 | 52.7% | 17,611 | 46.4% | 331 | 0.9% | 1 | 0.0% | 2,374 | 37,928 | ||||||||
New Hanover | 56% | 41,231 | 52.1% | 36,218 | 45.8% | 1,635 | 2.1% | 4 | 0.0% | 5,013 | 79,088 | ||||||||
Northampton | 51% | 2,822 | 32.2% | 5,861 | 66.9% | 71 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.0% | -3,039 | 8,756 | ||||||||
Onslow | 30% | 22,790 | 63.2% | 12,542 | 34.8% | 748 | 2.1% | 8 | 0.0% | 10,248 | 36,088 | ||||||||
Orange | 65% | 19,797 | 30.9% | 43,476 | 67.8% | 843 | 1.3% | 3 | 0.0% | -23,679 | 64,119 | ||||||||
Pamlico | 58% | 3,326 | 55.3% | 2,605 | 43.3% | 83 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 721 | 6,014 | ||||||||
Pasquotank | 47% | 5,669 | 42.7% | 7,426 | 55.9% | 184 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,757 | 13,279 | ||||||||
Pender | 48% | 9,182 | 54.6% | 7,390 | 43.9% | 252 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,792 | 16,824 | ||||||||
Perquimans | 51% | 2,566 | 52.7% | 2,242 | 46.0% | 64 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 324 | 4,872 | ||||||||
Person | 53% | 8,212 | 54.4% | 6,701 | 44.4% | 185 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,511 | 15,098 | ||||||||
Pitt | 47% | 26,489 | 50.1% | 26,019 | 49.2% | 398 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.0% | 470 | 52,908 | ||||||||
Polk | 59% | 4,825 | 52.7% | 4,169 | 45.5% | 159 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 656 | 9,153 | ||||||||
Randolph | 51% | 35,495 | 68.9% | 15,199 | 29.5% | 792 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 20,296 | 51,486 | ||||||||
Richmond | 46% | 6,574 | 40.8% | 9,221 | 57.2% | 274 | 1.7% | 60 | 0.4% | -2,647 | 16,129 | ||||||||
Robeson | 37% | 13,025 | 37.9% | 20,896 | 60.7% | 482 | 1.4% | 7 | 0.0% | -7,871 | 34,410 | ||||||||
Rockingham | 52% | 21,224 | 57.1% | 15,435 | 41.5% | 518 | 1.4% | 5 | 0.0% | 5,789 | 37,182 | ||||||||
Rowan | 51% | 31,998 | 62.1% | 18,543 | 36.0% | 1,011 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 13,455 | 51,552 | ||||||||
Rutherford | 48% | 14,061 | 58.4% | 9,669 | 40.1% | 358 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 4,392 | 24,088 | ||||||||
Sampson | 49% | 11,574 | 51.7% | 10,626 | 47.5% | 165 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.0% | 948 | 22,369 | ||||||||
Scotland | 41% | 4,336 | 40.4% | 6,282 | 58.5% | 113 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,946 | 10,731 | ||||||||
Stanly | 56% | 16,036 | 64.1% | 8,603 | 34.4% | 376 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 7,433 | 25,015 | ||||||||
Stokes | 57% | 13,456 | 67.8% | 6,138 | 30.9% | 258 | 1.3% | 6 | 0.0% | 7,318 | 19,858 | ||||||||
Surry | 47% | 16,740 | 65.0% | 8,735 | 33.9% | 275 | 1.1% | 4 | 0.0% | 8,005 | 25,754 | ||||||||
Swain | 49% | 2,344 | 46.8% | 2,587 | 51.6% | 79 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.0% | -243 | 5,011 | ||||||||
Transylvania | 61% | 8,586 | 56.2% | 6,421 | 42.0% | 277 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,165 | 15,284 | ||||||||
Tyrrell | 46% | 658 | 42.8% | 857 | 55.7% | 24 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | -199 | 1,539 | ||||||||
Union | 54% | 39,383 | 66.1% | 19,451 | 32.7% | 703 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 19,932 | 59,537 | ||||||||
Vance | 49% | 6,137 | 38.6% | 9,633 | 60.6% | 114 | 0.7% | 1 | 0.0% | -3,496 | 15,885 | ||||||||
Wake | 63% | 163,069 | 47.3% | 177,324 | 51.4% | 4,281 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | -14,255 | 344,674 | ||||||||
Warren | 51% | 2,510 | 31.3% | 5,424 | 67.6% | 82 | 1.0% | 9 | 0.1% | -2,914 | 8,025 | ||||||||
Washington | 54% | 2,126 | 38.9% | 3,285 | 60.1% | 56 | 1.0% | 2 | 0.0% | -1,159 | 5,469 | ||||||||
Watauga | 61% | 12,207 | 51.3% | 10,987 | 46.2% | 579 | 2.4% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,220 | 23,774 | ||||||||
Wayne | 46% | 23,026 | 56.9% | 17,116 | 42.3% | 318 | 0.8% | 1 | 0.0% | 5,910 | 40,461 | ||||||||
Wilkes | 53% | 18,173 | 65.9% | 8,967 | 32.5% | 435 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.0% | 9,206 | 27,576 | ||||||||
Wilson | 53% | 14,416 | 47.7% | 15,566 | 51.5% | 223 | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,150 | 30,205 | ||||||||
Yadkin | 55% | 11,464 | 73.3% | 3,956 | 25.3% | 215 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 7,508 | 15,635 | ||||||||
Yancey | 67% | 4,594 | 48.6% | 4,718 | 49.9% | 134 | 1.4% | 2 | 0.0% | -124 | 9,448 | ||||||||
TOTAL | 53% | 1,791,450 | 51.6% | 1,632,527 | 47.0% | 47,743 | 1.4% | 362 | 0.0% | 158,923 | 3,472,082 | ||||||||
Total R vote: 1,791,450 (51.6%) Total D vote: 1,632,527 (47.0%) Total Other vote: 48,105 (1.4%) | |||||||||||||||||||
* incumbent | |||||||||||||||||||
Campaign finance data for this election**: | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Disbursements: | $12,856,982 | $13,359,764 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Receipts: | $12,955,098 | $13,407,656 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash on Hand: | $98,114 | $76,803 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Contributions by Candidate: | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans by Candidate: | $0 | $3,757,012 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Individual Contributions: | $6,739,184 | $8,505,462 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Party Contributions: | $58,058 | $34,000 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Committee Contributions: | $2,796,484 | $825,187 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Transfers from Other Committees: | $2,759,705 | $184,445 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Supporting: | $971,019 | $2,584,920 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Opposing: | $11,535 | $2,345,018 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Independent Expenditures: | $959,484 | $239,902 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Spending: | $13,816,466 | $13,599,666 | $0 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
|
2004 Senate class 3, Alamance County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 30,614 | 56.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 22,580 | 41.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 714 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 53,912 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Alexander County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 10,073 | 64.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,430 | 34.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 222 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 15,725 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Alleghany County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,754 | 58.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,908 | 40.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 64 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 4,727 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Anson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 3,367 | 36.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,734 | 62.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 91 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 9,193 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Ashe County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 7,021 | 59.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,651 | 39.3% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 174 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 11,846 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Avery County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 5,157 | 71.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,917 | 26.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 161 | 2.2% |
TOTAL | 7,236 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Beaufort County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 11,109 | 56.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,231 | 41.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 303 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 19,646 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Bertie County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,640 | 33.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,227 | 66.0% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 54 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 7,921 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Bladen County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 5,073 | 42.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,661 | 56.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 143 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 11,877 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Brunswick County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 20,554 | 55.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 16,128 | 43.2% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 623 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 37,305 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Buncombe County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 46,763 | 46.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 51,745 | 51.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 2,112 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 100,631 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Burke County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 18,371 | 57.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 13,137 | 40.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 577 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 32,085 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Cabarrus County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 37,494 | 61.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 22,206 | 36.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 1,068 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 60,768 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Caldwell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 19,612 | 62.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,079 | 35.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 566 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 31,268 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Camden County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,083 | 56.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,576 | 42.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 62 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 3,721 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Carteret County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 16,082 | 63.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,875 | 34.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 443 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 25,408 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Caswell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 4,559 | 48.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,737 | 50.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 104 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 9,400 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Catawba County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 35,946 | 63.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 20,153 | 35.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 841 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 56,940 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Chatham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 11,816 | 45.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 13,601 | 52.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 333 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 25,751 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Cherokee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 6,426 | 60.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,966 | 37.6% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 155 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 10,548 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Chowan County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,457 | 47.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,638 | 50.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 90 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 5,185 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Clay County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,896 | 61.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,749 | 36.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 98 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 4,743 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Cleveland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 20,324 | 54.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 16,342 | 43.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 532 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 37,200 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Columbus County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 8,721 | 41.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,860 | 56.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 281 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 20,863 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Craven County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 21,402 | 57.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 15,299 | 41.0% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 581 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 37,290 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Cumberland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 44,145 | 46.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 50,097 | 52.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 1,331 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 95,573 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Currituck County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 5,007 | 59.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,172 | 37.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 212 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 8,391 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Dare County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 8,215 | 52.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,995 | 44.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 327 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 15,601 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Davidson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 38,913 | 65.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 19,530 | 32.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 952 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 59,395 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Davie County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 11,861 | 71.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,505 | 27.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 223 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 16,604 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Duplin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 8,613 | 52.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,768 | 46.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 181 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 16,573 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Durham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 32,217 | 29.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 76,294 | 69.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 1,205 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 109,718 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Edgecombe County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 7,072 | 33.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 13,822 | 65.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 195 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 21,089 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Forsyth County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 74,108 | 53.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 63,899 | 45.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 1,431 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 139,467 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Franklin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 10,421 | 49.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 10,197 | 48.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 295 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 20,914 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Gaston County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 39,857 | 62.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 22,750 | 35.7% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 1,092 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 63,700 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Gates County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 1,654 | 40.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,352 | 57.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 53 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 4,059 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Graham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,267 | 60.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,445 | 38.3% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 62 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 3,774 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Granville County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 8,447 | 45.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,806 | 53.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 214 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 18,468 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Greene County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 3,400 | 52.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,043 | 46.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 49 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 6,492 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Guilford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 89,926 | 45.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 106,315 | 53.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 2,371 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 198,614 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Halifax County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 7,110 | 36.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,457 | 63.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 162 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 19,731 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Harnett County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 18,501 | 57.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 13,417 | 41.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 435 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 32,365 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Haywood County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 12,949 | 49.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,710 | 48.6% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 477 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 26,141 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Henderson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 25,430 | 61.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 15,652 | 37.6% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 552 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 41,634 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Hertford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,478 | 31.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,428 | 68.0% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 76 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 7,986 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Hoke County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 4,431 | 40.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,271 | 57.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 199 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 10,901 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Hyde County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 1,060 | 48.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,118 | 50.7% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 28 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 2,206 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Iredell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 35,600 | 62.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 20,402 | 35.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 923 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 56,935 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Jackson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 6,656 | 47.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,220 | 51.2% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 228 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 14,104 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Johnston County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 33,334 | 61.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 19,966 | 37.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 563 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 53,876 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Jones County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,392 | 52.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,092 | 46.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 52 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 4,536 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Lee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 10,218 | 52.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,900 | 45.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 252 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 19,371 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Lenoir County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 11,707 | 51.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,012 | 48.2% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 141 | 0.6% |
TOTAL | 22,864 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Lincoln County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 18,422 | 62.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 10,657 | 36.0% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 556 | 1.9% |
TOTAL | 29,635 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Macon County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 8,399 | 58.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,896 | 40.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 159 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 14,454 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Madison County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 4,490 | 49.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,479 | 49.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 149 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 9,118 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Martin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 4,615 | 44.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,779 | 55.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 97 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 10,492 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, McDowell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 9,366 | 59.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,179 | 39.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 267 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 15,815 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Mecklenburg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 141,653 | 44.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 173,964 | 54.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 4,105 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 319,722 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Mitchell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 5,340 | 69.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,208 | 28.7% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 139 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 7,689 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Montgomery County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 5,234 | 52.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,693 | 46.6% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 143 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 10,072 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Moore County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 22,522 | 59.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 14,708 | 39.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 360 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 37,590 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Nash County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 19,985 | 52.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 17,611 | 46.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 331 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 37,928 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, New Hanover County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 41,231 | 52.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 36,218 | 45.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 1,635 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 79,088 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Northampton County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,822 | 32.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,861 | 66.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 71 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 8,756 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Onslow County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 22,790 | 63.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,542 | 34.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 748 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 36,088 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Orange County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 19,797 | 30.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 43,476 | 67.8% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 843 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 64,119 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Pamlico County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 3,326 | 55.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,605 | 43.3% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 83 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 6,014 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Pasquotank County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 5,669 | 42.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,426 | 55.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 184 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 13,279 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Pender County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 9,182 | 54.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,390 | 43.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 252 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 16,824 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Perquimans County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,566 | 52.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,242 | 46.0% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 64 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 4,872 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Person County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 8,212 | 54.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,701 | 44.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 185 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 15,098 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Pitt County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 26,489 | 50.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 26,019 | 49.2% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 398 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 52,908 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Polk County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 4,825 | 52.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,169 | 45.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 159 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 9,153 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Randolph County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 35,495 | 68.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 15,199 | 29.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 792 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 51,486 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Richmond County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 6,574 | 40.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,221 | 57.2% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 274 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 16,129 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Robeson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 13,025 | 37.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 20,896 | 60.7% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 482 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 34,410 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Rockingham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 21,224 | 57.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 15,435 | 41.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 518 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 37,182 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Rowan County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 31,998 | 62.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 18,543 | 36.0% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 1,011 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 51,552 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Rutherford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 14,061 | 58.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,669 | 40.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 358 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 24,088 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Sampson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 11,574 | 51.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 10,626 | 47.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 165 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 22,369 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Scotland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 4,336 | 40.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,282 | 58.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 113 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 10,731 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Stanly County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 16,036 | 64.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,603 | 34.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 376 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 25,015 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Stokes County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 13,456 | 67.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,138 | 30.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 258 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 19,858 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Surry County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 16,740 | 65.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,735 | 33.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 275 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 25,754 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Swain County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,344 | 46.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,587 | 51.6% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 79 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 5,011 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Transylvania County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 8,586 | 56.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,421 | 42.0% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 277 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 15,284 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Tyrrell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 658 | 42.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 857 | 55.7% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 24 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 1,539 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Union County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 39,383 | 66.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 19,451 | 32.7% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 703 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 59,537 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Vance County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 6,137 | 38.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,633 | 60.6% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 114 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 15,885 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Wake County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 163,069 | 47.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 177,324 | 51.4% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 4,281 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 344,674 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Warren County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,510 | 31.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,424 | 67.6% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 82 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 8,025 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Washington County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 2,126 | 38.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,285 | 60.1% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 56 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 5,469 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Watauga County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 12,207 | 51.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 10,987 | 46.2% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 579 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 23,774 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Wayne County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 23,026 | 56.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 17,116 | 42.3% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 318 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 40,461 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Wilkes County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 18,173 | 65.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,967 | 32.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 435 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 27,576 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Wilson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 14,416 | 47.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 15,566 | 51.5% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 223 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 30,205 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Yadkin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 11,464 | 73.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,956 | 25.3% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 215 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 15,635 | ||||||||
|
2004 Senate class 3, Yancey County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Richard Burr (R) | 4,594 | 48.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,718 | 49.9% | Tom Bailey (Lbt) | 134 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 9,448 | ||||||||
|
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Richard Burr | |
Total Disbursements: | $12,856,982 |
Total Receipts: | $12,955,098 |
Cash on Hand: | $98,114 |
Candidate Contributions: | $0 |
Candidate Loans: | $0 |
Individual Contributions: | $6,739,184 |
Party Contributions: | $58,058 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $2,796,484 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $2,759,705 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $971,019 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $11,535 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $959,484 |
Net Spending: | $13,816,466 |
Erskine Bowles | |
Total Disbursements: | $13,359,764 |
Total Receipts: | $13,407,656 |
Cash on Hand: | $76,803 |
Candidate Contributions: | $0 |
Candidate Loans: | $3,757,012 |
Individual Contributions: | $8,505,462 |
Party Contributions: | $34,000 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $825,187 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $184,445 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $2,584,920 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $2,345,018 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $239,902 |
Net Spending: | $13,599,666 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
Source: https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/senate/NC/2004
Republican Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
1 | Richard Burr | 302,391 | 87.9% | $12,856,982 |
2 | John Hendrix | 25,971 | 7.6% | |
3 | Albert Wiley | 15,585 | 4.5% | |
TOTAL VOTES | 343,947 |
Democrat Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
No Democrat primary |