2002-11-05 Senatorial Election Results for North Carolina (Class 2)

Click on a county in the table or the map to see demographic data for that county.

County	Turnout	Elizabeth Dole (R)		Erskine Bowles (D)		Sean Haugh (Libertarian)		Other		Margin	TOTAL
Alamance	34%	20,580	59.2%	13,587	39.1%	571	1.6%	16	0.0%	6,993	34,754
Alexander	46%	7,125	59.5%	4,570	38.2%	250	2.1%	23	0.2%	2,555	11,968
Alleghany	44%	1,846	48.8%	1,840	48.6%	91	2.4%	6	0.2%	6	3,783
Anson	32%	2,134	34.1%	4,063	64.9%	62	1.0%	0	0.0%	-1,929	6,259
Ashe	45%	4,886	54.0%	3,977	43.9%	186	2.1%	0	0.0%	909	9,049
Avery	35%	3,616	73.5%	1,228	24.9%	77	1.6%	1	0.0%	2,388	4,922
Beaufort	44%	9,057	58.5%	6,098	39.4%	317	2.0%	11	0.1%	2,959	15,483
Bertie	35%	1,671	31.3%	3,617	67.8%	47	0.9%	0	0.0%	-1,946	5,335
Bladen	35%	3,474	40.0%	5,144	59.2%	74	0.9%	0	0.0%	-1,670	8,692
Brunswick	41%	14,002	53.8%	11,537	44.3%	489	1.9%	0	0.0%	2,465	26,028
Buncombe	38%	31,360	49.4%	31,359	49.4%	754	1.2%	0	0.0%	1	63,473
Burke	38%	14,351	55.0%	11,115	42.6%	608	2.3%	27	0.1%	3,236	26,101
Cabarrus	38%	25,434	63.9%	13,657	34.3%	683	1.7%	2	0.0%	11,777	39,776
Caldwell	37%	13,245	59.3%	8,511	38.1%	544	2.4%	24	0.1%	4,734	22,324
Camden	47%	1,292	48.6%	1,325	49.9%	39	1.5%	0	0.0%	-33	2,656
Carteret	41%	12,408	61.9%	7,216	36.0%	408	2.0%	0	0.0%	5,192	20,032
Caswell	37%	3,049	45.2%	3,615	53.6%	84	1.2%	2	0.0%	-566	6,750
Catawba	36%	25,318	64.1%	13,436	34.0%	772	2.0%	0	0.0%	11,882	39,526
Chatham	47%	8,897	46.8%	9,809	51.6%	289	1.5%	3	0.0%	-912	18,998
Cherokee	42%	4,878	58.5%	3,355	40.2%	108	1.3%	1	0.0%	1,523	8,342
Chowan	33%	1,744	47.2%	1,894	51.2%	60	1.6%	0	0.0%	-150	3,698
Clay	48%	2,209	61.3%	1,342	37.2%	54	1.5%	0	0.0%	867	3,605
Cleveland	35%	13,984	54.4%	11,330	44.1%	392	1.5%	8	0.0%	2,654	25,714
Columbus	37%	5,925	39.1%	9,015	59.6%	195	1.3%	0	0.0%	-3,090	15,135
Craven	36%	15,162	58.7%	10,240	39.6%	434	1.7%	0	0.0%	4,922	25,836
Cumberland	26%	27,941	48.1%	29,417	50.6%	758	1.3%	0	0.0%	-1,476	58,116
Currituck	40%	3,309	57.8%	2,337	40.8%	82	1.4%	0	0.0%	972	5,728
Dare	42%	5,695	55.5%	4,418	43.1%	143	1.4%	4	0.0%	1,277	10,260
Davidson	39%	27,277	61.5%	15,992	36.1%	1,042	2.4%	7	0.0%	11,285	44,318
Davie	40%	7,659	70.5%	3,008	27.7%	175	1.6%	23	0.2%	4,651	10,865
Duplin	31%	5,476	47.3%	5,912	51.0%	181	1.6%	12	0.1%	-436	11,581
Durham	37%	23,841	35.6%	42,350	63.3%	739	1.1%	13	0.0%	-18,509	66,943
Edgecombe	34%	4,766	33.9%	9,160	65.1%	142	1.0%	2	0.0%	-4,394	14,070
Forsyth	40%	50,867	53.6%	42,696	45.0%	1,277	1.3%	12	0.0%	8,171	94,852
Franklin	39%	7,170	49.8%	6,950	48.2%	289	2.0%	3	0.0%	220	14,412
Gaston	29%	27,176	63.4%	14,976	34.9%	703	1.6%	1	0.0%	12,200	42,856
Gates	27%	764	34.7%	1,425	64.8%	10	0.5%	0	0.0%	-661	2,199
Graham	65%	2,220	53.3%	1,906	45.8%	40	1.0%	0	0.0%	314	4,166
Granville	30%	5,511	46.8%	6,146	52.1%	131	1.1%	0	0.0%	-635	11,788
Greene	31%	2,274	49.8%	2,252	49.3%	42	0.9%	0	0.0%	22	4,568
Guilford	39%	64,997	49.8%	64,050	49.0%	1,541	1.2%	7	0.0%	947	130,595
Halifax	34%	5,432	38.0%	8,714	60.9%	151	1.1%	1	0.0%	-3,282	14,298
Harnett	30%	12,174	58.6%	8,263	39.8%	322	1.5%	21	0.1%	3,911	20,780
Haywood	41%	8,438	47.3%	9,155	51.3%	258	1.4%	5	0.0%	-717	17,856
Henderson	41%	19,283	64.0%	10,575	35.1%	251	0.8%	2	0.0%	8,708	30,111
Hertford	31%	1,499	27.8%	3,854	71.6%	28	0.5%	5	0.1%	-2,355	5,386
Hoke	25%	2,513	40.1%	3,665	58.4%	91	1.5%	3	0.0%	-1,152	6,272
Hyde	40%	853	45.3%	1,008	53.5%	23	1.2%	0	0.0%	-155	1,884
Iredell	35%	21,646	63.6%	11,852	34.8%	550	1.6%	5	0.0%	9,794	34,053
Jackson	33%	4,161	44.9%	4,988	53.8%	118	1.3%	3	0.0%	-827	9,270
Johnston	37%	22,719	63.2%	12,722	35.4%	484	1.3%	2	0.0%	9,997	35,927
Jones	54%	2,065	49.2%	2,067	49.2%	69	1.6%	0	0.0%	-2	4,201
Lee	35%	7,375	55.2%	5,820	43.5%	167	1.2%	8	0.1%	1,555	13,370
Lenoir	40%	8,888	50.3%	8,624	48.8%	152	0.9%	0	0.0%	264	17,664
Lincoln	41%	12,309	60.2%	7,649	37.4%	470	2.3%	4	0.0%	4,660	20,432
Macon	47%	6,383	55.0%	4,932	42.5%	298	2.6%	0	0.0%	1,451	11,613
Madison	47%	3,300	44.7%	3,994	54.1%	91	1.2%	1	0.0%	-694	7,386
Martin	42%	3,334	41.3%	4,630	57.3%	113	1.4%	1	0.0%	-1,296	8,078
McDowell	34%	6,202	54.9%	4,901	43.4%	156	1.4%	31	0.3%	1,301	11,290
Mecklenburg	36%	100,762	50.0%	98,332	48.8%	2,448	1.2%	29	0.0%	2,430	201,571
Mitchell	44%	3,801	69.5%	1,590	29.1%	82	1.5%	0	0.0%	2,211	5,473
Montgomery	35%	3,502	49.3%	3,474	48.9%	129	1.8%	2	0.0%	28	7,107
Moore	43%	16,753	64.4%	8,951	34.4%	317	1.2%	2	0.0%	7,802	26,023
Nash	39%	14,564	56.3%	11,032	42.7%	251	1.0%	1	0.0%	3,532	25,848
New Hanover	40%	29,478	55.6%	22,641	42.7%	869	1.6%	3	0.0%	6,837	52,991
Northampton	39%	2,006	30.2%	4,564	68.8%	67	1.0%	0	0.0%	-2,558	6,637
Onslow	20%	14,256	60.6%	8,687	36.9%	550	2.3%	30	0.1%	5,569	23,523
Orange	41%	13,629	34.5%	25,401	64.3%	474	1.2%	22	0.1%	-11,772	39,526
Pamlico	48%	2,734	55.4%	2,112	42.8%	90	1.8%	0	0.0%	622	4,936
Pasquotank	25%	2,984	42.9%	3,921	56.4%	48	0.7%	0	0.0%	-937	6,953
Pender	37%	6,364	51.2%	5,876	47.3%	182	1.5%	2	0.0%	488	12,424
Perquimans	38%	1,688	49.2%	1,710	49.8%	34	1.0%	0	0.0%	-22	3,432
Person	38%	5,873	56.1%	4,444	42.4%	159	1.5%	0	0.0%	1,429	10,476
Pitt	32%	18,514	54.1%	15,446	45.1%	270	0.8%	4	0.0%	3,068	34,234
Polk	45%	3,939	58.4%	2,713	40.2%	98	1.5%	0	0.0%	1,226	6,750
Randolph	32%	22,134	69.0%	9,366	29.2%	564	1.8%	1	0.0%	12,768	32,065
Richmond	32%	4,167	38.0%	6,600	60.2%	190	1.7%	4	0.0%	-2,433	10,961
Robeson	23%	7,410	35.9%	12,864	62.3%	185	0.9%	199	1.0%	-5,454	20,658
Rockingham	37%	13,899	52.3%	12,062	45.4%	626	2.4%	2	0.0%	1,837	26,589
Rowan	36%	22,688	63.8%	12,153	34.2%	733	2.1%	5	0.0%	10,535	35,579
Rutherford	36%	10,012	57.7%	7,101	40.9%	242	1.4%	0	0.0%	2,911	17,355
Sampson	36%	8,367	51.7%	7,645	47.2%	171	1.1%	12	0.1%	722	16,195
Scotland	29%	3,072	40.5%	4,442	58.5%	74	1.0%	1	0.0%	-1,370	7,589
Stanly	42%	11,680	62.5%	6,643	35.5%	366	2.0%	0	0.0%	5,037	18,689
Stokes	40%	8,567	62.1%	4,888	35.4%	335	2.4%	9	0.1%	3,679	13,799
Surry	33%	10,723	58.8%	7,161	39.2%	362	2.0%	1	0.0%	3,562	18,247
Swain	36%	1,636	45.2%	1,940	53.7%	40	1.1%	0	0.0%	-304	3,616
Transylvania	47%	6,416	56.1%	4,862	42.5%	156	1.4%	1	0.0%	1,554	11,435
Tyrrell	36%	478	40.0%	701	58.6%	17	1.4%	0	0.0%	-223	1,196
Union	37%	24,032	65.6%	12,059	32.9%	545	1.5%	5	0.0%	11,973	36,641
Vance	31%	4,126	42.2%	5,584	57.1%	73	0.7%	2	0.0%	-1,458	9,785
Wake	44%	122,445	54.3%	100,371	44.5%	2,780	1.2%	27	0.0%	22,074	225,623
Warren	37%	1,900	32.9%	3,833	66.5%	33	0.6%	2	0.0%	-1,933	5,768
Washington	42%	1,658	38.9%	2,548	59.9%	51	1.2%	0	0.0%	-890	4,257
Watauga	42%	8,832	56.2%	6,561	41.7%	320	2.0%	16	0.1%	2,271	15,729
Wayne	32%	16,372	60.1%	10,637	39.0%	223	0.8%	23	0.1%	5,735	27,255
Wilkes	39%	12,238	61.5%	7,208	36.2%	448	2.3%	6	0.0%	5,030	19,900
Wilson	34%	9,756	51.0%	9,230	48.2%	151	0.8%	0	0.0%	526	19,137
Yadkin	41%	8,128	70.3%	3,139	27.1%	292	2.5%	7	0.1%	4,989	11,566
Yancey	58%	3,917	47.7%	4,203	51.2%	87	1.1%	9	0.1%	-286	8,216
TOTAL	37%	1,248,664	53.6%	1,047,983	45.0%	33,807	1.5%	727	0.0%	200,681	2,331,181
Total R vote: 1,248,664 (53.6%)      Total D vote: 1,047,983 (45.0%)      Total Other vote: 34,534 (1.5%)
* incumbent
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Total Disbursements:		$13,735,220		$13,306,317		$0
Total Receipts:		$13,840,946		$13,335,229		$0
Cash on Hand:		$105,727		$28,913		$0
Contributions by Candidate:		$30,736		$0		$0
Loans by Candidate:		$0		$6,850,000		$0
Total Individual Contributions:		$11,149,786		$5,235,680		$0
Party Contributions:		$28,166		$18,850		$0
Other Committee Contributions:		$1,469,611		$523,128		$0
Transfers from Other Committees:		$1,124,663		$658,655		$0
Independent Expenditures Supporting:		$126,472		$90,913		$0
Independent Expenditures Opposing:		$2		$0		$0
Net Independent Expenditures:		$126,470		$90,913		$0
Net Spending:		$13,861,690		$13,397,230		$0

2002 Senate class 2, Alamance County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	20,580	59.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	13,587	39.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	571	1.6%
TOTAL	34,754
Turnout: 34%

2002 Senate class 2, Alexander County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	7,125	59.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,570	38.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	250	2.1%
TOTAL	11,968
Turnout: 46%

2002 Senate class 2, Alleghany County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,846	48.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,840	48.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	91	2.4%
TOTAL	3,783
Turnout: 44%

2002 Senate class 2, Anson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,134	34.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,063	64.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	62	1.0%
TOTAL	6,259
Turnout: 32%

2002 Senate class 2, Ashe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	4,886	54.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,977	43.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	186	2.1%
TOTAL	9,049
Turnout: 45%

2002 Senate class 2, Avery County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,616	73.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,228	24.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	77	1.6%
TOTAL	4,922
Turnout: 35%

2002 Senate class 2, Beaufort County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	9,057	58.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,098	39.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	317	2.0%
TOTAL	15,483
Turnout: 44%

2002 Senate class 2, Bertie County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,671	31.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,617	67.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	47	0.9%
TOTAL	5,335
Turnout: 35%

2002 Senate class 2, Bladen County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,474	40.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,144	59.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	74	0.9%
TOTAL	8,692
Turnout: 35%

2002 Senate class 2, Brunswick County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	14,002	53.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,537	44.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	489	1.9%
TOTAL	26,028
Turnout: 41%

2002 Senate class 2, Buncombe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	31,360	49.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	31,359	49.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	754	1.2%
TOTAL	63,473
Turnout: 38%

2002 Senate class 2, Burke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	14,351	55.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,115	42.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	608	2.3%
TOTAL	26,101
Turnout: 38%

2002 Senate class 2, Cabarrus County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	25,434	63.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	13,657	34.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	683	1.7%
TOTAL	39,776
Turnout: 38%

2002 Senate class 2, Caldwell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	13,245	59.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,511	38.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	544	2.4%
TOTAL	22,324
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Camden County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,292	48.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,325	49.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	39	1.5%
TOTAL	2,656
Turnout: 47%

2002 Senate class 2, Carteret County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	12,408	61.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,216	36.0%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	408	2.0%
TOTAL	20,032
Turnout: 41%

2002 Senate class 2, Caswell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,049	45.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,615	53.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	84	1.2%
TOTAL	6,750
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Catawba County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	25,318	64.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	13,436	34.0%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	772	2.0%
TOTAL	39,526
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Chatham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	8,897	46.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,809	51.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	289	1.5%
TOTAL	18,998
Turnout: 47%

2002 Senate class 2, Cherokee County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	4,878	58.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,355	40.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	108	1.3%
TOTAL	8,342
Turnout: 42%

2002 Senate class 2, Chowan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,744	47.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,894	51.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	60	1.6%
TOTAL	3,698
Turnout: 33%

2002 Senate class 2, Clay County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,209	61.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,342	37.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	54	1.5%
TOTAL	3,605
Turnout: 48%

2002 Senate class 2, Cleveland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	13,984	54.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,330	44.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	392	1.5%
TOTAL	25,714
Turnout: 35%

2002 Senate class 2, Columbus County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	5,925	39.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,015	59.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	195	1.3%
TOTAL	15,135
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Craven County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	15,162	58.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	10,240	39.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	434	1.7%
TOTAL	25,836
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Cumberland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	27,941	48.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	29,417	50.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	758	1.3%
TOTAL	58,116
Turnout: 26%

2002 Senate class 2, Currituck County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,309	57.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,337	40.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	82	1.4%
TOTAL	5,728
Turnout: 40%

2002 Senate class 2, Dare County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	5,695	55.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,418	43.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	143	1.4%
TOTAL	10,260
Turnout: 42%

2002 Senate class 2, Davidson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	27,277	61.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	15,992	36.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	1,042	2.4%
TOTAL	44,318
Turnout: 39%

2002 Senate class 2, Davie County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	7,659	70.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,008	27.7%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	175	1.6%
TOTAL	10,865
Turnout: 40%

2002 Senate class 2, Duplin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	5,476	47.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,912	51.0%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	181	1.6%
TOTAL	11,581
Turnout: 31%

2002 Senate class 2, Durham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	23,841	35.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	42,350	63.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	739	1.1%
TOTAL	66,943
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Edgecombe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	4,766	33.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,160	65.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	142	1.0%
TOTAL	14,070
Turnout: 34%

2002 Senate class 2, Forsyth County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	50,867	53.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	42,696	45.0%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	1,277	1.3%
TOTAL	94,852
Turnout: 40%

2002 Senate class 2, Franklin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	7,170	49.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,950	48.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	289	2.0%
TOTAL	14,412
Turnout: 39%

2002 Senate class 2, Gaston County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	27,176	63.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	14,976	34.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	703	1.6%
TOTAL	42,856
Turnout: 29%

2002 Senate class 2, Gates County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	764	34.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,425	64.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	10	0.5%
TOTAL	2,199
Turnout: 27%

2002 Senate class 2, Graham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,220	53.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,906	45.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	40	1.0%
TOTAL	4,166
Turnout: 65%

2002 Senate class 2, Granville County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	5,511	46.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,146	52.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	131	1.1%
TOTAL	11,788
Turnout: 30%

2002 Senate class 2, Greene County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,274	49.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,252	49.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	42	0.9%
TOTAL	4,568
Turnout: 31%

2002 Senate class 2, Guilford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	64,997	49.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	64,050	49.0%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	1,541	1.2%
TOTAL	130,595
Turnout: 39%

2002 Senate class 2, Halifax County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	5,432	38.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,714	60.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	151	1.1%
TOTAL	14,298
Turnout: 34%

2002 Senate class 2, Harnett County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	12,174	58.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,263	39.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	322	1.5%
TOTAL	20,780
Turnout: 30%

2002 Senate class 2, Haywood County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	8,438	47.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,155	51.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	258	1.4%
TOTAL	17,856
Turnout: 41%

2002 Senate class 2, Henderson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	19,283	64.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	10,575	35.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	251	0.8%
TOTAL	30,111
Turnout: 41%

2002 Senate class 2, Hertford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,499	27.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,854	71.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	28	0.5%
TOTAL	5,386
Turnout: 31%

2002 Senate class 2, Hoke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,513	40.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,665	58.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	91	1.5%
TOTAL	6,272
Turnout: 25%

2002 Senate class 2, Hyde County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	853	45.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,008	53.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	23	1.2%
TOTAL	1,884
Turnout: 40%

2002 Senate class 2, Iredell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	21,646	63.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,852	34.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	550	1.6%
TOTAL	34,053
Turnout: 35%

2002 Senate class 2, Jackson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	4,161	44.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,988	53.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	118	1.3%
TOTAL	9,270
Turnout: 33%

2002 Senate class 2, Johnston County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	22,719	63.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,722	35.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	484	1.3%
TOTAL	35,927
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Jones County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,065	49.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,067	49.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	69	1.6%
TOTAL	4,201
Turnout: 54%

2002 Senate class 2, Lee County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	7,375	55.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,820	43.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	167	1.2%
TOTAL	13,370
Turnout: 35%

2002 Senate class 2, Lenoir County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	8,888	50.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,624	48.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	152	0.9%
TOTAL	17,664
Turnout: 40%

2002 Senate class 2, Lincoln County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	12,309	60.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,649	37.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	470	2.3%
TOTAL	20,432
Turnout: 41%

2002 Senate class 2, Macon County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	6,383	55.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,932	42.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	298	2.6%
TOTAL	11,613
Turnout: 47%

2002 Senate class 2, Madison County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,300	44.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,994	54.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	91	1.2%
TOTAL	7,386
Turnout: 47%

2002 Senate class 2, Martin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,334	41.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,630	57.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	113	1.4%
TOTAL	8,078
Turnout: 42%

2002 Senate class 2, McDowell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	6,202	54.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,901	43.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	156	1.4%
TOTAL	11,290
Turnout: 34%

2002 Senate class 2, Mecklenburg County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	100,762	50.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	98,332	48.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	2,448	1.2%
TOTAL	201,571
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Mitchell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,801	69.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,590	29.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	82	1.5%
TOTAL	5,473
Turnout: 44%

2002 Senate class 2, Montgomery County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,502	49.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,474	48.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	129	1.8%
TOTAL	7,107
Turnout: 35%

2002 Senate class 2, Moore County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	16,753	64.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,951	34.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	317	1.2%
TOTAL	26,023
Turnout: 43%

2002 Senate class 2, Nash County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	14,564	56.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,032	42.7%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	251	1.0%
TOTAL	25,848
Turnout: 39%

2002 Senate class 2, New Hanover County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	29,478	55.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	22,641	42.7%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	869	1.6%
TOTAL	52,991
Turnout: 40%

2002 Senate class 2, Northampton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,006	30.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,564	68.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	67	1.0%
TOTAL	6,637
Turnout: 39%

2002 Senate class 2, Onslow County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	14,256	60.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,687	36.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	550	2.3%
TOTAL	23,523
Turnout: 20%

2002 Senate class 2, Orange County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	13,629	34.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	25,401	64.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	474	1.2%
TOTAL	39,526
Turnout: 41%

2002 Senate class 2, Pamlico County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,734	55.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,112	42.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	90	1.8%
TOTAL	4,936
Turnout: 48%

2002 Senate class 2, Pasquotank County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	2,984	42.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,921	56.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	48	0.7%
TOTAL	6,953
Turnout: 25%

2002 Senate class 2, Pender County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	6,364	51.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,876	47.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	182	1.5%
TOTAL	12,424
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Perquimans County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,688	49.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,710	49.8%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	34	1.0%
TOTAL	3,432
Turnout: 38%

2002 Senate class 2, Person County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	5,873	56.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,444	42.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	159	1.5%
TOTAL	10,476
Turnout: 38%

2002 Senate class 2, Pitt County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	18,514	54.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	15,446	45.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	270	0.8%
TOTAL	34,234
Turnout: 32%

2002 Senate class 2, Polk County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,939	58.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,713	40.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	98	1.5%
TOTAL	6,750
Turnout: 45%

2002 Senate class 2, Randolph County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	22,134	69.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,366	29.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	564	1.8%
TOTAL	32,065
Turnout: 32%

2002 Senate class 2, Richmond County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	4,167	38.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,600	60.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	190	1.7%
TOTAL	10,961
Turnout: 32%

2002 Senate class 2, Robeson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	7,410	35.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,864	62.3%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	185	0.9%
TOTAL	20,658
Turnout: 23%

2002 Senate class 2, Rockingham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	13,899	52.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,062	45.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	626	2.4%
TOTAL	26,589
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Rowan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	22,688	63.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,153	34.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	733	2.1%
TOTAL	35,579
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Rutherford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	10,012	57.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,101	40.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	242	1.4%
TOTAL	17,355
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Sampson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	8,367	51.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,645	47.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	171	1.1%
TOTAL	16,195
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Scotland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,072	40.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,442	58.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	74	1.0%
TOTAL	7,589
Turnout: 29%

2002 Senate class 2, Stanly County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	11,680	62.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,643	35.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	366	2.0%
TOTAL	18,689
Turnout: 42%

2002 Senate class 2, Stokes County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	8,567	62.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,888	35.4%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	335	2.4%
TOTAL	13,799
Turnout: 40%

2002 Senate class 2, Surry County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	10,723	58.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,161	39.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	362	2.0%
TOTAL	18,247
Turnout: 33%

2002 Senate class 2, Swain County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,636	45.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,940	53.7%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	40	1.1%
TOTAL	3,616
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Transylvania County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	6,416	56.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,862	42.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	156	1.4%
TOTAL	11,435
Turnout: 47%

2002 Senate class 2, Tyrrell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	478	40.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	701	58.6%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	17	1.4%
TOTAL	1,196
Turnout: 36%

2002 Senate class 2, Union County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	24,032	65.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,059	32.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	545	1.5%
TOTAL	36,641
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Vance County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	4,126	42.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,584	57.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	73	0.7%
TOTAL	9,785
Turnout: 31%

2002 Senate class 2, Wake County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	122,445	54.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	100,371	44.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	2,780	1.2%
TOTAL	225,623
Turnout: 44%

2002 Senate class 2, Warren County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,900	32.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,833	66.5%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	33	0.6%
TOTAL	5,768
Turnout: 37%

2002 Senate class 2, Washington County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	1,658	38.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,548	59.9%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	51	1.2%
TOTAL	4,257
Turnout: 42%

2002 Senate class 2, Watauga County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	8,832	56.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,561	41.7%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	320	2.0%
TOTAL	15,729
Turnout: 42%

2002 Senate class 2, Wayne County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	16,372	60.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	10,637	39.0%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	223	0.8%
TOTAL	27,255
Turnout: 32%

2002 Senate class 2, Wilkes County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	12,238	61.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,208	36.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	448	2.3%
TOTAL	19,900
Turnout: 39%

2002 Senate class 2, Wilson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	9,756	51.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,230	48.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	151	0.8%
TOTAL	19,137
Turnout: 34%

2002 Senate class 2, Yadkin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	8,128	70.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,139	27.1%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	292	2.5%
TOTAL	11,566
Turnout: 41%

2002 Senate class 2, Yancey County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Elizabeth Dole (R)	3,917	47.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,203	51.2%
Sean Haugh (Lbt)	87	1.1%
TOTAL	8,216
Turnout: 58%

Campaign finance data for this election**:

Elizabeth Dole
Total Disbursements:	$13,735,220
Total Receipts:	$13,840,946
Cash on Hand:	$105,727
Candidate Contributions:	$30,736
Candidate Loans:	$0
Individual Contributions:	$11,149,786
Party Contributions:	$28,166
Other Committee Contributions:	$1,469,611
Other Committee Transfers:	$1,124,663
Indep. Expenditures Supporting:	$126,472
Indep. Expenditures Opposing:	$2
Net Independent Expenditures:	$126,470
Net Spending:	$13,861,690

Erskine Bowles
Total Disbursements:	$13,306,317
Total Receipts:	$13,335,229
Cash on Hand:	$28,913
Candidate Contributions:	$0
Candidate Loans:	$6,850,000
Individual Contributions:	$5,235,680
Party Contributions:	$18,850
Other Committee Contributions:	$523,128
Other Committee Transfers:	$658,655
Indep. Expenditures Supporting:	$90,913
Indep. Expenditures Opposing:	$0
Net Independent Expenditures:	$90,913
Net Spending:	$13,397,230

**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
Source: https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/senate/NC/2002