RightDataUSA

1928 Presidential Election Results for North Carolina


Election Year:
Election Type:
Runoff Election: No Yes
State:
Congressional District:
(House elections)


Map Data to Display: Vote Margin
Winner
Vote Margin %
Total Votes
District Boundaries


Areas won by 3rd party candidates are shown in green on the map regardless of the color used in the data table below.




Click on a county in the table or the map to see demographic data for that county.

County Turnout Herbert Hoover
(R)
Al Smith
(D)
Norman Thomas
(Socialist)
Other TOTAL
Alamance 57% 6,810 61.5% 4,260 38.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11,070
Alexander 74% 2,605 60.2% 1,722 39.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,327
Alleghany 80% 1,368 49.2% 1,414 50.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,782
Anson 28% 726 19.8% 2,947 80.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,673
Ashe 78% 4,337 55.6% 3,458 44.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,795
Avery 67% 3,273 89.4% 390 10.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,663
Beaufort 39% 2,521 41.6% 3,533 58.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,054
Bertie 21% 374 15.8% 2,000 84.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,374
Bladen 35% 1,911 55.2% 1,552 44.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,463
Brunswick 42% 1,931 65.5% 1,018 34.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,949
Buncombe 66% 16,590 57.2% 12,405 42.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28,995
Burke 61% 5,108 63.9% 2,881 36.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,989
Cabarrus 57% 6,548 57.4% 4,869 42.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11,417
Caldwell 54% 4,207 64.7% 2,291 35.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,498
Camden 35% 245 28.2% 624 71.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 869
Carteret 65% 3,133 60.5% 2,045 39.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,178
Caswell 21% 749 44.5% 936 55.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,685
Catawba 64% 7,556 60.6% 4,916 39.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12,472
Chatham 52% 3,318 55.3% 2,680 44.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,998
Cherokee 69% 3,239 62.9% 1,911 37.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,150
Chowan 25% 352 27.3% 936 72.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,288
Clay 79% 1,106 55.1% 903 44.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,009
Cleveland 44% 4,766 49.2% 4,914 50.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,680
Columbus 39% 3,533 55.3% 2,854 44.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,387
Craven 34% 2,237 47.3% 2,494 52.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,731
Cumberland 35% 3,534 51.7% 3,297 48.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,831
Currituck 45% 166 11.7% 1,253 88.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,419
Dare 66% 814 48.0% 883 52.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,697
Davidson 67% 8,960 63.2% 5,220 36.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14,180
Davie 61% 2,959 73.2% 1,085 26.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,044
Duplin 36% 2,911 52.4% 2,647 47.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,558
Durham 43% 8,723 66.1% 4,482 33.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13,205
Edgecombe 25% 977 18.9% 4,184 81.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,161
Forsyth 40% 13,258 66.6% 6,639 33.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19,897
Franklin 26% 729 20.5% 2,831 79.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,560
Gaston 49% 9,702 59.1% 6,702 40.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16,404
Gates 23% 558 49.4% 572 50.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,130
Graham 86% 1,260 56.7% 963 43.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,223
Granville 29% 858 22.5% 2,962 77.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,820
Greene 21% 542 31.5% 1,181 68.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,723
Guilford 45% 16,541 62.6% 9,872 37.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 26,413
Halifax 25% 890 15.4% 4,882 84.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,772
Harnett 50% 4,740 57.1% 3,554 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,294
Haywood 66% 4,472 51.7% 4,173 48.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,645
Henderson 77% 5,210 62.3% 3,149 37.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,359
Hertford 18% 393 27.6% 1,030 72.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,423
Hoke 25% 311 21.2% 1,154 78.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,465
Hyde 33% 682 53.6% 590 46.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,272
Iredell 55% 6,712 58.1% 4,836 41.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11,548
Jackson 81% 3,512 52.6% 3,171 47.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,683
Johnston 49% 7,696 60.4% 5,041 39.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12,737
Jones 25% 658 57.5% 486 42.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,144
Lee 42% 1,416 45.2% 1,715 54.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,131
Lenoir 23% 1,311 35.7% 2,363 64.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,674
Lincoln 68% 3,930 57.4% 2,913 42.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,843
Macon 77% 2,903 57.0% 2,191 43.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,094
Madison 60% 4,776 81.4% 1,093 18.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,869
Martin 31% 411 12.7% 2,818 87.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,229
McDowell 75% 3,423 49.9% 3,430 50.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,853
Mecklenburg 39% 12,041 55.4% 9,690 44.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21,731
Mitchell 65% 3,436 80.6% 827 19.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,263
Montgomery 64% 2,653 56.8% 2,016 43.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,669
Moore 46% 3,290 55.5% 2,639 44.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,929
Nash 27% 2,066 32.7% 4,249 67.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,315
New Hanover 35% 4,248 60.6% 2,760 39.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,008
Northampton 18% 456 20.9% 1,723 79.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,179
Onslow 32% 1,253 53.9% 1,072 46.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,325
Orange 41% 2,564 58.8% 1,799 41.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,363
Pamlico 46% 1,099 55.6% 878 44.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,977
Pasquotank 31% 814 29.5% 1,943 70.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,757
Pender 33% 1,300 56.6% 998 43.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,298
Perquimans 24% 600 49.6% 609 50.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,209
Person 24% 1,123 47.6% 1,235 52.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,358
Pitt 24% 1,395 23.1% 4,646 76.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,041
Polk 71% 1,873 53.7% 1,616 46.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,489
Randolph 70% 7,414 63.9% 4,188 36.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11,602
Richmond 34% 2,045 40.7% 2,975 59.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,020
Robeson 28% 2,767 36.9% 4,730 63.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,497
Rockingham 39% 5,585 62.1% 3,411 37.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,996
Rowan 49% 7,957 62.5% 4,783 37.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12,740
Rutherford 55% 5,762 58.2% 4,146 41.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,908
Sampson 44% 5,579 70.9% 2,285 29.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,864
Scotland 28% 588 25.0% 1,761 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,349
Stanly 54% 4,597 60.5% 3,000 39.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,597
Stokes 58% 3,759 65.6% 1,970 34.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,729
Surry 59% 7,015 65.8% 3,647 34.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,662
Swain 76% 2,484 59.0% 1,723 41.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,207
Transylvania 87% 2,165 55.7% 1,722 44.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,887
Tyrrell 41% 505 51.5% 475 48.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 980
Union 30% 2,448 46.3% 2,840 53.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,288
Vance 32% 1,449 37.7% 2,395 62.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,844
Wake 37% 6,720 41.8% 9,341 58.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16,061
Warren 23% 379 15.7% 2,037 84.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,416
Washington 41% 1,183 56.8% 898 43.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,081
Watauga 76% 3,159 54.9% 2,591 45.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,750
Wayne 35% 4,340 53.8% 3,720 46.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,060
Wilkes 64% 7,808 73.6% 2,802 26.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,610
Wilson 27% 1,933 35.4% 3,535 64.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,468
Yadkin 55% 3,878 83.6% 761 16.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,639
Yancey 75% 2,712 52.3% 2,476 47.7% 0 0.0% 00.0% 5,188
TOTAL 44% 348,92354.9% 286,22745.1% 00.0% 00.0% 635,150



1928 President, Alamance County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,810 61.5%
Al Smith (D) 4,260 38.5%
TOTAL 11,070
Turnout: 57% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 3


1928 President, Alexander County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,605 60.2%
Al Smith (D) 1,722 39.8%
TOTAL 4,327
Turnout: 74% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Alleghany County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,368 49.2%
Al Smith (D) 1,414 50.8%
TOTAL 2,782
Turnout: 80% Diff (St): -6 Diff (US): -9


1928 President, Anson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 726 19.8%
Al Smith (D) 2,947 80.2%
TOTAL 3,673
Turnout: 28% Diff (St): -35 Diff (US): -38


1928 President, Ashe County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,337 55.6%
Al Smith (D) 3,458 44.4%
TOTAL 7,795
Turnout: 78% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Avery County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,273 89.4%
Al Smith (D) 390 10.6%
TOTAL 3,663
Turnout: 67% Diff (St): 34 Diff (US): 31


1928 President, Beaufort County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,521 41.6%
Al Smith (D) 3,533 58.4%
TOTAL 6,054
Turnout: 39% Diff (St): -13 Diff (US): -17


1928 President, Bertie County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 374 15.8%
Al Smith (D) 2,000 84.2%
TOTAL 2,374
Turnout: 21% Diff (St): -39 Diff (US): -42


1928 President, Bladen County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,911 55.2%
Al Smith (D) 1,552 44.8%
TOTAL 3,463
Turnout: 35% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Brunswick County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,931 65.5%
Al Smith (D) 1,018 34.5%
TOTAL 2,949
Turnout: 42% Diff (St): 11 Diff (US): 7


1928 President, Buncombe County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 16,590 57.2%
Al Smith (D) 12,405 42.8%
TOTAL 28,995
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Burke County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,108 63.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,881 36.1%
TOTAL 7,989
Turnout: 61% Diff (St): 9 Diff (US): 6


1928 President, Cabarrus County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,548 57.4%
Al Smith (D) 4,869 42.6%
TOTAL 11,417
Turnout: 57% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Caldwell County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,207 64.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,291 35.3%
TOTAL 6,498
Turnout: 54% Diff (St): 10 Diff (US): 7


1928 President, Camden County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 245 28.2%
Al Smith (D) 624 71.8%
TOTAL 869
Turnout: 35% Diff (St): -27 Diff (US): -30


1928 President, Carteret County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,133 60.5%
Al Smith (D) 2,045 39.5%
TOTAL 5,178
Turnout: 65% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Caswell County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 749 44.5%
Al Smith (D) 936 55.5%
TOTAL 1,685
Turnout: 21% Diff (St): -10 Diff (US): -14


1928 President, Catawba County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,556 60.6%
Al Smith (D) 4,916 39.4%
TOTAL 12,472
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Chatham County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,318 55.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,680 44.7%
TOTAL 5,998
Turnout: 52% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Cherokee County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,239 62.9%
Al Smith (D) 1,911 37.1%
TOTAL 5,150
Turnout: 69% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 5


1928 President, Chowan County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 352 27.3%
Al Smith (D) 936 72.7%
TOTAL 1,288
Turnout: 25% Diff (St): -28 Diff (US): -31


1928 President, Clay County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,106 55.1%
Al Smith (D) 903 44.9%
TOTAL 2,009
Turnout: 79% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Cleveland County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,766 49.2%
Al Smith (D) 4,914 50.8%
TOTAL 9,680
Turnout: 44% Diff (St): -6 Diff (US): -9


1928 President, Columbus County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,533 55.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,854 44.7%
TOTAL 6,387
Turnout: 39% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Craven County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,237 47.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,494 52.7%
TOTAL 4,731
Turnout: 34% Diff (St): -8 Diff (US): -11


1928 President, Cumberland County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,534 51.7%
Al Smith (D) 3,297 48.3%
TOTAL 6,831
Turnout: 35% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): -6


1928 President, Currituck County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 166 11.7%
Al Smith (D) 1,253 88.3%
TOTAL 1,419
Turnout: 45% Diff (St): -43 Diff (US): -47


1928 President, Dare County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 814 48.0%
Al Smith (D) 883 52.0%
TOTAL 1,697
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): -7 Diff (US): -10


1928 President, Davidson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 8,960 63.2%
Al Smith (D) 5,220 36.8%
TOTAL 14,180
Turnout: 67% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 5


1928 President, Davie County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,959 73.2%
Al Smith (D) 1,085 26.8%
TOTAL 4,044
Turnout: 61% Diff (St): 18 Diff (US): 15


1928 President, Duplin County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,911 52.4%
Al Smith (D) 2,647 47.6%
TOTAL 5,558
Turnout: 36% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): -6


1928 President, Durham County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 8,723 66.1%
Al Smith (D) 4,482 33.9%
TOTAL 13,205
Turnout: 43% Diff (St): 11 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Edgecombe County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 977 18.9%
Al Smith (D) 4,184 81.1%
TOTAL 5,161
Turnout: 25% Diff (St): -36 Diff (US): -39


1928 President, Forsyth County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 13,258 66.6%
Al Smith (D) 6,639 33.4%
TOTAL 19,897
Turnout: 40% Diff (St): 12 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Franklin County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 729 20.5%
Al Smith (D) 2,831 79.5%
TOTAL 3,560
Turnout: 26% Diff (St): -34 Diff (US): -38


1928 President, Gaston County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 9,702 59.1%
Al Smith (D) 6,702 40.9%
TOTAL 16,404
Turnout: 49% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Gates County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 558 49.4%
Al Smith (D) 572 50.6%
TOTAL 1,130
Turnout: 23% Diff (St): -6 Diff (US): -9


1928 President, Graham County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,260 56.7%
Al Smith (D) 963 43.3%
TOTAL 2,223
Turnout: 86% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -2


1928 President, Granville County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 858 22.5%
Al Smith (D) 2,962 77.5%
TOTAL 3,820
Turnout: 29% Diff (St): -32 Diff (US): -36


1928 President, Greene County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 542 31.5%
Al Smith (D) 1,181 68.5%
TOTAL 1,723
Turnout: 21% Diff (St): -23 Diff (US): -27


1928 President, Guilford County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 16,541 62.6%
Al Smith (D) 9,872 37.4%
TOTAL 26,413
Turnout: 45% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 4


1928 President, Halifax County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 890 15.4%
Al Smith (D) 4,882 84.6%
TOTAL 5,772
Turnout: 25% Diff (St): -40 Diff (US): -43


1928 President, Harnett County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,740 57.1%
Al Smith (D) 3,554 42.9%
TOTAL 8,294
Turnout: 50% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Haywood County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,472 51.7%
Al Smith (D) 4,173 48.3%
TOTAL 8,645
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): -6


1928 President, Henderson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,210 62.3%
Al Smith (D) 3,149 37.7%
TOTAL 8,359
Turnout: 77% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 4


1928 President, Hertford County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 393 27.6%
Al Smith (D) 1,030 72.4%
TOTAL 1,423
Turnout: 18% Diff (St): -27 Diff (US): -31


1928 President, Hoke County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 311 21.2%
Al Smith (D) 1,154 78.8%
TOTAL 1,465
Turnout: 25% Diff (St): -34 Diff (US): -37


1928 President, Hyde County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 682 53.6%
Al Smith (D) 590 46.4%
TOTAL 1,272
Turnout: 33% Diff (St): -1 Diff (US): -5


1928 President, Iredell County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,712 58.1%
Al Smith (D) 4,836 41.9%
TOTAL 11,548
Turnout: 55% Diff (St): 3 Diff (US): 0


1928 President, Jackson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,512 52.6%
Al Smith (D) 3,171 47.4%
TOTAL 6,683
Turnout: 81% Diff (St): -2 Diff (US): -6


1928 President, Johnston County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,696 60.4%
Al Smith (D) 5,041 39.6%
TOTAL 12,737
Turnout: 49% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Jones County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 658 57.5%
Al Smith (D) 486 42.5%
TOTAL 1,144
Turnout: 25% Diff (St): 3 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Lee County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,416 45.2%
Al Smith (D) 1,715 54.8%
TOTAL 3,131
Turnout: 42% Diff (St): -10 Diff (US): -13


1928 President, Lenoir County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,311 35.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,363 64.3%
TOTAL 3,674
Turnout: 23% Diff (St): -19 Diff (US): -23


1928 President, Lincoln County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,930 57.4%
Al Smith (D) 2,913 42.6%
TOTAL 6,843
Turnout: 68% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, McDowell County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,423 49.9%
Al Smith (D) 3,430 50.1%
TOTAL 6,853
Turnout: 75% Diff (St): -5 Diff (US): -8


1928 President, Macon County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,903 57.0%
Al Smith (D) 2,191 43.0%
TOTAL 5,094
Turnout: 77% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Madison County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,776 81.4%
Al Smith (D) 1,093 18.6%
TOTAL 5,869
Turnout: 60% Diff (St): 26 Diff (US): 23


1928 President, Martin County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 411 12.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,818 87.3%
TOTAL 3,229
Turnout: 31% Diff (St): -42 Diff (US): -45


1928 President, Mecklenburg County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 12,041 55.4%
Al Smith (D) 9,690 44.6%
TOTAL 21,731
Turnout: 39% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Mitchell County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,436 80.6%
Al Smith (D) 827 19.4%
TOTAL 4,263
Turnout: 65% Diff (St): 26 Diff (US): 22


1928 President, Montgomery County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,653 56.8%
Al Smith (D) 2,016 43.2%
TOTAL 4,669
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Moore County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,290 55.5%
Al Smith (D) 2,639 44.5%
TOTAL 5,929
Turnout: 46% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Nash County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,066 32.7%
Al Smith (D) 4,249 67.3%
TOTAL 6,315
Turnout: 27% Diff (St): -22 Diff (US): -25


1928 President, New Hanover County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,248 60.6%
Al Smith (D) 2,760 39.4%
TOTAL 7,008
Turnout: 35% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Northampton County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 456 20.9%
Al Smith (D) 1,723 79.1%
TOTAL 2,179
Turnout: 18% Diff (St): -34 Diff (US): -37


1928 President, Onslow County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,253 53.9%
Al Smith (D) 1,072 46.1%
TOTAL 2,325
Turnout: 32% Diff (St): -1 Diff (US): -4


1928 President, Orange County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,564 58.8%
Al Smith (D) 1,799 41.2%
TOTAL 4,363
Turnout: 41% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Pamlico County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,099 55.6%
Al Smith (D) 878 44.4%
TOTAL 1,977
Turnout: 46% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Pasquotank County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 814 29.5%
Al Smith (D) 1,943 70.5%
TOTAL 2,757
Turnout: 31% Diff (St): -25 Diff (US): -29


1928 President, Pender County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,300 56.6%
Al Smith (D) 998 43.4%
TOTAL 2,298
Turnout: 33% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -2


1928 President, Perquimans County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 600 49.6%
Al Smith (D) 609 50.4%
TOTAL 1,209
Turnout: 24% Diff (St): -5 Diff (US): -9


1928 President, Person County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,123 47.6%
Al Smith (D) 1,235 52.4%
TOTAL 2,358
Turnout: 24% Diff (St): -7 Diff (US): -11


1928 President, Pitt County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,395 23.1%
Al Smith (D) 4,646 76.9%
TOTAL 6,041
Turnout: 24% Diff (St): -32 Diff (US): -35


1928 President, Polk County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,873 53.7%
Al Smith (D) 1,616 46.3%
TOTAL 3,489
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): -1 Diff (US): -5


1928 President, Randolph County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,414 63.9%
Al Smith (D) 4,188 36.1%
TOTAL 11,602
Turnout: 70% Diff (St): 9 Diff (US): 6


1928 President, Richmond County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,045 40.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,975 59.3%
TOTAL 5,020
Turnout: 34% Diff (St): -14 Diff (US): -17


1928 President, Robeson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,767 36.9%
Al Smith (D) 4,730 63.1%
TOTAL 7,497
Turnout: 28% Diff (St): -18 Diff (US): -21


1928 President, Rockingham County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,585 62.1%
Al Smith (D) 3,411 37.9%
TOTAL 8,996
Turnout: 39% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 4


1928 President, Rowan County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,957 62.5%
Al Smith (D) 4,783 37.5%
TOTAL 12,740
Turnout: 49% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 4


1928 President, Rutherford County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,762 58.2%
Al Smith (D) 4,146 41.8%
TOTAL 9,908
Turnout: 55% Diff (St): 3 Diff (US): 0


1928 President, Sampson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,579 70.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,285 29.1%
TOTAL 7,864
Turnout: 44% Diff (St): 16 Diff (US): 13


1928 President, Scotland County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 588 25.0%
Al Smith (D) 1,761 75.0%
TOTAL 2,349
Turnout: 28% Diff (St): -30 Diff (US): -33


1928 President, Stanly County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,597 60.5%
Al Smith (D) 3,000 39.5%
TOTAL 7,597
Turnout: 54% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Stokes County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,759 65.6%
Al Smith (D) 1,970 34.4%
TOTAL 5,729
Turnout: 58% Diff (St): 11 Diff (US): 7


1928 President, Surry County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,015 65.8%
Al Smith (D) 3,647 34.2%
TOTAL 10,662
Turnout: 59% Diff (St): 11 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Swain County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,484 59.0%
Al Smith (D) 1,723 41.0%
TOTAL 4,207
Turnout: 76% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Transylvania County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,165 55.7%
Al Smith (D) 1,722 44.3%
TOTAL 3,887
Turnout: 87% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Tyrrell County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 505 51.5%
Al Smith (D) 475 48.5%
TOTAL 980
Turnout: 41% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): -7


1928 President, Union County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,448 46.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,840 53.7%
TOTAL 5,288
Turnout: 30% Diff (St): -9 Diff (US): -12


1928 President, Vance County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,449 37.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,395 62.3%
TOTAL 3,844
Turnout: 32% Diff (St): -17 Diff (US): -21


1928 President, Wake County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,720 41.8%
Al Smith (D) 9,341 58.2%
TOTAL 16,061
Turnout: 37% Diff (St): -13 Diff (US): -16


1928 President, Warren County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 379 15.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,037 84.3%
TOTAL 2,416
Turnout: 23% Diff (St): -39 Diff (US): -43


1928 President, Washington County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,183 56.8%
Al Smith (D) 898 43.2%
TOTAL 2,081
Turnout: 41% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Watauga County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,159 54.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,591 45.1%
TOTAL 5,750
Turnout: 76% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Wayne County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,340 53.8%
Al Smith (D) 3,720 46.2%
TOTAL 8,060
Turnout: 35% Diff (St): -1 Diff (US): -4


1928 President, Wilkes County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,808 73.6%
Al Smith (D) 2,802 26.4%
TOTAL 10,610
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): 19 Diff (US): 15


1928 President, Wilson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 1,933 35.4%
Al Smith (D) 3,535 64.6%
TOTAL 5,468
Turnout: 27% Diff (St): -20 Diff (US): -23


1928 President, Yadkin County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,878 83.6%
Al Smith (D) 761 16.4%
TOTAL 4,639
Turnout: 55% Diff (St): 29 Diff (US): 25


1928 President, Yancey County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,712 52.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,476 47.7%
TOTAL 5,188
Turnout: 75% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): -6
* incumbent