RightDataUSA

1928 Presidential Election Results for Iowa


Election Year:
Election Type:
Runoff Election: No Yes
State:
Congressional District:
(House elections)


Map Data to Display: Vote Margin
Winner
Vote Margin %
Total Votes
District Boundaries


Areas won by 3rd party candidates are shown in green on the map regardless of the color used in the data table below.




Click on a county in the table or the map to see demographic data for that county.

County Turnout Herbert Hoover
(R)
Al Smith
(D)
Norman Thomas
(Socialist)
Other TOTAL
Adair 72% 4,176 69.3% 1,854 30.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,030
Adams 70% 2,958 66.7% 1,479 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,437
Allamakee 85% 4,785 59.7% 3,227 40.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,012
Appanoose 66% 6,864 67.3% 3,340 32.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,204
Audubon 64% 2,340 49.7% 2,364 50.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,704
Benton 67% 5,669 63.2% 3,307 36.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,976
Black Hawk 71% 19,409 69.6% 8,467 30.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 27,876
Boone 59% 7,521 71.2% 3,049 28.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,570
Bremer 71% 3,879 55.2% 3,146 44.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,025
Buchanan 83% 5,885 65.5% 3,099 34.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,984
Buena Vista 68% 5,087 66.1% 2,609 33.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,696
Butler 64% 4,789 71.9% 1,876 28.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,665
Calhoun 64% 4,136 60.7% 2,681 39.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,817
Carroll 82% 4,014 39.6% 6,134 60.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,148
Cass 74% 6,120 69.9% 2,640 30.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,760
Cedar 75% 4,856 65.9% 2,517 34.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,373
Cerro Gordo 63% 9,582 66.1% 4,908 33.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14,490
Cherokee 60% 3,909 59.1% 2,701 40.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,610
Chickasaw 88% 3,712 50.3% 3,665 49.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,377
Clarke 71% 2,780 62.9% 1,642 37.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,422
Clay 64% 3,986 65.9% 2,064 34.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,050
Clayton 77% 6,774 61.6% 4,231 38.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11,005
Clinton 82% 12,295 58.7% 8,643 41.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 20,938
Crawford 66% 3,436 43.3% 4,495 56.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,931
Dallas 71% 7,294 70.1% 3,108 29.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,402
Davis 84% 3,097 54.8% 2,559 45.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,656
Decatur 69% 3,942 59.6% 2,675 40.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,617
Delaware 85% 5,390 63.9% 3,043 36.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,433
Des Moines 72% 10,547 65.4% 5,578 34.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16,125
Dickinson 66% 3,045 70.9% 1,251 29.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,296
Dubuque 86% 9,744 33.4% 19,437 66.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 29,181
Emmet 61% 3,218 70.1% 1,372 29.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,590
Fayette 72% 8,338 67.2% 4,061 32.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12,399
Floyd 68% 5,675 73.2% 2,074 26.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,749
Franklin 52% 3,424 67.0% 1,688 33.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,112
Fremont 69% 3,597 56.0% 2,822 44.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,419
Greene 64% 4,299 68.2% 2,007 31.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,306
Grundy 63% 3,671 69.4% 1,620 30.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,291
Guthrie 67% 4,772 68.1% 2,235 31.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,007
Hamilton 58% 4,171 58.4% 2,975 41.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,146
Hancock 59% 3,114 61.7% 1,933 38.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,047
Hardin 58% 5,731 70.7% 2,373 29.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,104
Harrison 69% 5,605 56.0% 4,406 44.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,011
Henry 67% 5,160 71.5% 2,053 28.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,213
Howard 84% 3,375 51.4% 3,193 48.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,568
Humboldt 57% 2,828 62.7% 1,679 37.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,507
Ida 65% 2,486 53.4% 2,172 46.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,658
Iowa 68% 4,091 57.1% 3,075 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,166
Jackson 81% 4,740 56.0% 3,729 44.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,469
Jasper 69% 9,144 70.3% 3,857 29.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13,001
Jefferson 70% 4,919 69.5% 2,159 30.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,078
Johnson 76% 7,288 50.4% 7,181 49.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 14,469
Jones 73% 5,090 63.1% 2,976 36.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,066
Keokuk 77% 5,304 58.4% 3,772 41.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,076
Kossuth 66% 4,878 50.7% 4,736 49.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,614
Lee 80% 11,645 59.9% 7,785 40.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19,430
Linn 79% 25,452 68.5% 11,715 31.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 37,167
Louisa 71% 3,275 69.2% 1,457 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,732
Lucas 62% 3,811 66.9% 1,888 33.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,699
Lyon 55% 3,170 66.0% 1,632 34.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,802
Madison 77% 4,364 66.7% 2,178 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,542
Mahaska 67% 7,368 69.7% 3,200 30.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,568
Marion 68% 6,225 60.2% 4,113 39.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,338
Marshall 64% 9,326 73.4% 3,384 26.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12,710
Mills 61% 3,429 61.1% 2,179 38.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,608
Mitchell 71% 3,534 60.5% 2,308 39.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,842
Monona 60% 3,745 56.9% 2,836 43.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,581
Monroe 68% 4,060 59.0% 2,819 41.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,879
Montgomery 70% 5,155 71.3% 2,079 28.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,234
Muscatine 75% 8,604 68.0% 4,055 32.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12,659
O'Brien 65% 4,845 66.9% 2,397 33.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,242
Osceola 60% 2,085 57.1% 1,567 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3,652
Page 62% 7,181 74.3% 2,478 25.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,659
Palo Alto 70% 3,463 54.9% 2,843 45.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,306
Plymouth 71% 4,848 49.2% 5,015 50.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,863
Pocahontas 66% 3,322 54.1% 2,824 45.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,146
Polk 61% 42,290 68.2% 19,725 31.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 62,015
Pottawattamie 62% 14,354 59.2% 9,905 40.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 24,259
Poweshiek 70% 5,212 65.2% 2,787 34.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,999
Ringgold 69% 3,674 70.0% 1,572 30.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,246
Sac 65% 4,461 64.9% 2,414 35.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,875
Scott 68% 16,974 56.7% 12,942 43.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 29,916
Shelby 73% 3,459 49.0% 3,604 51.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,063
Sioux 61% 6,378 69.2% 2,839 30.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,217
Story 60% 9,035 76.9% 2,714 23.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11,749
Tama 81% 5,589 53.8% 4,798 46.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10,387
Taylor 74% 4,700 69.4% 2,074 30.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,774
Union 77% 5,432 67.2% 2,651 32.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,083
Van Buren 76% 3,904 66.8% 1,944 33.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5,848
Wapello 71% 11,586 66.7% 5,793 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 17,379
Warren 76% 5,294 70.3% 2,239 29.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7,533
Washington 74% 5,948 68.4% 2,754 31.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8,702
Wayne 74% 3,911 60.3% 2,579 39.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6,490
Webster 63% 8,525 56.8% 6,497 43.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 15,022
Winnebago 58% 3,386 72.8% 1,268 27.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,654
Winneshiek 74% 5,084 52.9% 4,535 47.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9,619
Woodbury 64% 20,587 55.0% 16,831 45.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 37,418
Worth 62% 2,921 69.0% 1,310 31.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4,231
Wright 62% 5,020 66.3% 2,547 33.7% 0 0.0% 00.0% 7,567
TOTAL 69% 623,57061.8% 379,01137.6% 2,9600.3% 3,6480.4% 1,009,189



1928 President, Adair County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,176 69.3%
Al Smith (D) 1,854 30.7%
TOTAL 6,030
Turnout: 72% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Adams County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,958 66.7%
Al Smith (D) 1,479 33.3%
TOTAL 4,437
Turnout: 70% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Allamakee County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,785 59.7%
Al Smith (D) 3,227 40.3%
TOTAL 8,012
Turnout: 85% Diff (St): -2 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Appanoose County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,864 67.3%
Al Smith (D) 3,340 32.7%
TOTAL 10,204
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Audubon County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,340 49.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,364 50.3%
TOTAL 4,704
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): -12 Diff (US): -8


1928 President, Benton County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,669 63.2%
Al Smith (D) 3,307 36.8%
TOTAL 8,976
Turnout: 67% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): 5


1928 President, Black Hawk County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 19,409 69.6%
Al Smith (D) 8,467 30.4%
TOTAL 27,876
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Boone County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,521 71.2%
Al Smith (D) 3,049 28.8%
TOTAL 10,570
Turnout: 59% Diff (St): 9 Diff (US): 13


1928 President, Bremer County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,879 55.2%
Al Smith (D) 3,146 44.8%
TOTAL 7,025
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): -7 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Buchanan County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,885 65.5%
Al Smith (D) 3,099 34.5%
TOTAL 8,984
Turnout: 83% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 7


1928 President, Buena Vista County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,087 66.1%
Al Smith (D) 2,609 33.9%
TOTAL 7,696
Turnout: 68% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Butler County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,789 71.9%
Al Smith (D) 1,876 28.1%
TOTAL 6,665
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): 10 Diff (US): 14


1928 President, Calhoun County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,136 60.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,681 39.3%
TOTAL 6,817
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): -1 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Carroll County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,014 39.6%
Al Smith (D) 6,134 60.4%
TOTAL 10,148
Turnout: 82% Diff (St): -22 Diff (US): -19


1928 President, Cass County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,120 69.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,640 30.1%
TOTAL 8,760
Turnout: 74% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 12


1928 President, Cedar County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,856 65.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,517 34.1%
TOTAL 7,373
Turnout: 75% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Cerro Gordo County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 9,582 66.1%
Al Smith (D) 4,908 33.9%
TOTAL 14,490
Turnout: 63% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Cherokee County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,909 59.1%
Al Smith (D) 2,701 40.9%
TOTAL 6,610
Turnout: 60% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Chickasaw County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,712 50.3%
Al Smith (D) 3,665 49.7%
TOTAL 7,377
Turnout: 88% Diff (St): -11 Diff (US): -8


1928 President, Clarke County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,780 62.9%
Al Smith (D) 1,642 37.1%
TOTAL 4,422
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): 5


1928 President, Clay County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,986 65.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,064 34.1%
TOTAL 6,050
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Clayton County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,774 61.6%
Al Smith (D) 4,231 38.4%
TOTAL 11,005
Turnout: 77% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): 3


1928 President, Clinton County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 12,295 58.7%
Al Smith (D) 8,643 41.3%
TOTAL 20,938
Turnout: 82% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Crawford County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,436 43.3%
Al Smith (D) 4,495 56.7%
TOTAL 7,931
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): -18 Diff (US): -15


1928 President, Dallas County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,294 70.1%
Al Smith (D) 3,108 29.9%
TOTAL 10,402
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 12


1928 President, Davis County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,097 54.8%
Al Smith (D) 2,559 45.2%
TOTAL 5,656
Turnout: 84% Diff (St): -7 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Decatur County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,942 59.6%
Al Smith (D) 2,675 40.4%
TOTAL 6,617
Turnout: 69% Diff (St): -2 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Delaware County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,390 63.9%
Al Smith (D) 3,043 36.1%
TOTAL 8,433
Turnout: 85% Diff (St): 2 Diff (US): 6


1928 President, Des Moines County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 10,547 65.4%
Al Smith (D) 5,578 34.6%
TOTAL 16,125
Turnout: 72% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 7


1928 President, Dickinson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,045 70.9%
Al Smith (D) 1,251 29.1%
TOTAL 4,296
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): 9 Diff (US): 13


1928 President, Dubuque County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 9,744 33.4%
Al Smith (D) 19,437 66.6%
TOTAL 29,181
Turnout: 86% Diff (St): -28 Diff (US): -25


1928 President, Emmet County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,218 70.1%
Al Smith (D) 1,372 29.9%
TOTAL 4,590
Turnout: 61% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 12


1928 President, Fayette County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 8,338 67.2%
Al Smith (D) 4,061 32.8%
TOTAL 12,399
Turnout: 72% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Floyd County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,675 73.2%
Al Smith (D) 2,074 26.8%
TOTAL 7,749
Turnout: 68% Diff (St): 11 Diff (US): 15


1928 President, Franklin County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,424 67.0%
Al Smith (D) 1,688 33.0%
TOTAL 5,112
Turnout: 52% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Fremont County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,597 56.0%
Al Smith (D) 2,822 44.0%
TOTAL 6,419
Turnout: 69% Diff (St): -6 Diff (US): -2


1928 President, Greene County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,299 68.2%
Al Smith (D) 2,007 31.8%
TOTAL 6,306
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 10


1928 President, Grundy County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,671 69.4%
Al Smith (D) 1,620 30.6%
TOTAL 5,291
Turnout: 63% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Guthrie County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,772 68.1%
Al Smith (D) 2,235 31.9%
TOTAL 7,007
Turnout: 67% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 10


1928 President, Hamilton County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,171 58.4%
Al Smith (D) 2,975 41.6%
TOTAL 7,146
Turnout: 58% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): 0


1928 President, Hancock County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,114 61.7%
Al Smith (D) 1,933 38.3%
TOTAL 5,047
Turnout: 59% Diff (St): 0 Diff (US): 4


1928 President, Hardin County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,731 70.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,373 29.3%
TOTAL 8,104
Turnout: 58% Diff (St): 9 Diff (US): 13


1928 President, Harrison County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,605 56.0%
Al Smith (D) 4,406 44.0%
TOTAL 10,011
Turnout: 69% Diff (St): -6 Diff (US): -2


1928 President, Henry County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,160 71.5%
Al Smith (D) 2,053 28.5%
TOTAL 7,213
Turnout: 67% Diff (St): 10 Diff (US): 13


1928 President, Howard County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,375 51.4%
Al Smith (D) 3,193 48.6%
TOTAL 6,568
Turnout: 84% Diff (St): -10 Diff (US): -7


1928 President, Humboldt County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,828 62.7%
Al Smith (D) 1,679 37.3%
TOTAL 4,507
Turnout: 57% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): 5


1928 President, Ida County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,486 53.4%
Al Smith (D) 2,172 46.6%
TOTAL 4,658
Turnout: 65% Diff (St): -8 Diff (US): -5


1928 President, Iowa County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,091 57.1%
Al Smith (D) 3,075 42.9%
TOTAL 7,166
Turnout: 68% Diff (St): -5 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Jackson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,740 56.0%
Al Smith (D) 3,729 44.0%
TOTAL 8,469
Turnout: 81% Diff (St): -6 Diff (US): -2


1928 President, Jasper County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 9,144 70.3%
Al Smith (D) 3,857 29.7%
TOTAL 13,001
Turnout: 69% Diff (St): 9 Diff (US): 12


1928 President, Jefferson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,919 69.5%
Al Smith (D) 2,159 30.5%
TOTAL 7,078
Turnout: 70% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Johnson County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,288 50.4%
Al Smith (D) 7,181 49.6%
TOTAL 14,469
Turnout: 76% Diff (St): -11 Diff (US): -8


1928 President, Jones County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,090 63.1%
Al Smith (D) 2,976 36.9%
TOTAL 8,066
Turnout: 73% Diff (St): 1 Diff (US): 5


1928 President, Keokuk County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,304 58.4%
Al Smith (D) 3,772 41.6%
TOTAL 9,076
Turnout: 77% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): 0


1928 President, Kossuth County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,878 50.7%
Al Smith (D) 4,736 49.3%
TOTAL 9,614
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): -11 Diff (US): -7


1928 President, Lee County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 11,645 59.9%
Al Smith (D) 7,785 40.1%
TOTAL 19,430
Turnout: 80% Diff (St): -2 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Linn County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 25,452 68.5%
Al Smith (D) 11,715 31.5%
TOTAL 37,167
Turnout: 79% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 10


1928 President, Louisa County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,275 69.2%
Al Smith (D) 1,457 30.8%
TOTAL 4,732
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Lucas County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,811 66.9%
Al Smith (D) 1,888 33.1%
TOTAL 5,699
Turnout: 62% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Lyon County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,170 66.0%
Al Smith (D) 1,632 34.0%
TOTAL 4,802
Turnout: 55% Diff (St): 4 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Madison County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,364 66.7%
Al Smith (D) 2,178 33.3%
TOTAL 6,542
Turnout: 77% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Mahaska County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,368 69.7%
Al Smith (D) 3,200 30.3%
TOTAL 10,568
Turnout: 67% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 12


1928 President, Marion County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,225 60.2%
Al Smith (D) 4,113 39.8%
TOTAL 10,338
Turnout: 68% Diff (St): -2 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Marshall County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 9,326 73.4%
Al Smith (D) 3,384 26.6%
TOTAL 12,710
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): 12 Diff (US): 15


1928 President, Mills County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,429 61.1%
Al Smith (D) 2,179 38.9%
TOTAL 5,608
Turnout: 61% Diff (St): -1 Diff (US): 3


1928 President, Mitchell County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,534 60.5%
Al Smith (D) 2,308 39.5%
TOTAL 5,842
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): -1 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Monona County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,745 56.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,836 43.1%
TOTAL 6,581
Turnout: 60% Diff (St): -5 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Monroe County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,060 59.0%
Al Smith (D) 2,819 41.0%
TOTAL 6,879
Turnout: 68% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Montgomery County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,155 71.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,079 28.7%
TOTAL 7,234
Turnout: 70% Diff (St): 9 Diff (US): 13


1928 President, Muscatine County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 8,604 68.0%
Al Smith (D) 4,055 32.0%
TOTAL 12,659
Turnout: 75% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 10


1928 President, O'Brien County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,845 66.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,397 33.1%
TOTAL 7,242
Turnout: 65% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Osceola County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,085 57.1%
Al Smith (D) 1,567 42.9%
TOTAL 3,652
Turnout: 60% Diff (St): -5 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Page County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 7,181 74.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,478 25.7%
TOTAL 9,659
Turnout: 62% Diff (St): 13 Diff (US): 16


1928 President, Palo Alto County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,463 54.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,843 45.1%
TOTAL 6,306
Turnout: 70% Diff (St): -7 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Plymouth County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,848 49.2%
Al Smith (D) 5,015 50.8%
TOTAL 9,863
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): -13 Diff (US): -9


1928 President, Pocahontas County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,322 54.1%
Al Smith (D) 2,824 45.9%
TOTAL 6,146
Turnout: 66% Diff (St): -8 Diff (US): -4


1928 President, Polk County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 42,290 68.2%
Al Smith (D) 19,725 31.8%
TOTAL 62,015
Turnout: 61% Diff (St): 6 Diff (US): 10


1928 President, Pottawattamie County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 14,354 59.2%
Al Smith (D) 9,905 40.8%
TOTAL 24,259
Turnout: 62% Diff (St): -3 Diff (US): 1


1928 President, Poweshiek County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,212 65.2%
Al Smith (D) 2,787 34.8%
TOTAL 7,999
Turnout: 70% Diff (St): 3 Diff (US): 7


1928 President, Ringgold County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,674 70.0%
Al Smith (D) 1,572 30.0%
TOTAL 5,246
Turnout: 69% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 12


1928 President, Sac County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,461 64.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,414 35.1%
TOTAL 6,875
Turnout: 65% Diff (St): 3 Diff (US): 7


1928 President, Scott County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 16,974 56.7%
Al Smith (D) 12,942 43.3%
TOTAL 29,916
Turnout: 68% Diff (St): -5 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Shelby County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,459 49.0%
Al Smith (D) 3,604 51.0%
TOTAL 7,063
Turnout: 73% Diff (St): -13 Diff (US): -9


1928 President, Sioux County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 6,378 69.2%
Al Smith (D) 2,839 30.8%
TOTAL 9,217
Turnout: 61% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Story County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 9,035 76.9%
Al Smith (D) 2,714 23.1%
TOTAL 11,749
Turnout: 60% Diff (St): 15 Diff (US): 19


1928 President, Tama County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,589 53.8%
Al Smith (D) 4,798 46.2%
TOTAL 10,387
Turnout: 81% Diff (St): -8 Diff (US): -4


1928 President, Taylor County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 4,700 69.4%
Al Smith (D) 2,074 30.6%
TOTAL 6,774
Turnout: 74% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Union County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,432 67.2%
Al Smith (D) 2,651 32.8%
TOTAL 8,083
Turnout: 77% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Van Buren County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,904 66.8%
Al Smith (D) 1,944 33.2%
TOTAL 5,848
Turnout: 76% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 9


1928 President, Wapello County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 11,586 66.7%
Al Smith (D) 5,793 33.3%
TOTAL 17,379
Turnout: 71% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 8


1928 President, Warren County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,294 70.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,239 29.7%
TOTAL 7,533
Turnout: 76% Diff (St): 8 Diff (US): 12


1928 President, Washington County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,948 68.4%
Al Smith (D) 2,754 31.6%
TOTAL 8,702
Turnout: 74% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 10


1928 President, Wayne County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,911 60.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,579 39.7%
TOTAL 6,490
Turnout: 74% Diff (St): -2 Diff (US): 2


1928 President, Webster County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 8,525 56.8%
Al Smith (D) 6,497 43.2%
TOTAL 15,022
Turnout: 63% Diff (St): -5 Diff (US): -1


1928 President, Winnebago County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 3,386 72.8%
Al Smith (D) 1,268 27.2%
TOTAL 4,654
Turnout: 58% Diff (St): 11 Diff (US): 15


1928 President, Winneshiek County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,084 52.9%
Al Smith (D) 4,535 47.1%
TOTAL 9,619
Turnout: 74% Diff (St): -9 Diff (US): -5


1928 President, Woodbury County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 20,587 55.0%
Al Smith (D) 16,831 45.0%
TOTAL 37,418
Turnout: 64% Diff (St): -7 Diff (US): -3


1928 President, Worth County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 2,921 69.0%
Al Smith (D) 1,310 31.0%
TOTAL 4,231
Turnout: 62% Diff (St): 7 Diff (US): 11


1928 President, Wright County
CandidateVotesPct
Herbert Hoover (R) 5,020 66.3%
Al Smith (D) 2,547 33.7%
TOTAL 7,567
Turnout: 62% Diff (St): 5 Diff (US): 8
* incumbent