1990-11-06 Senatorial Election Results for Texas (Class 2)

Click on a county in the table or the map to see demographic data for that county.

County	Turnout	Phil Gramm* (R)		Hugh Parmer (D)		Gary Johnson (Libertarian)		Ira Calkins (I)		Other		Margin	TOTAL
Anderson	28%	6,263	61.0%	3,826	37.3%	167	1.6%	5	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,437	10,261
Andrews	29%	2,152	78.8%	530	19.4%	48	1.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,622	2,730
Angelina	33%	9,522	57.3%	6,828	41.1%	259	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,694	16,609
Aransas	35%	3,229	67.9%	1,416	29.8%	112	2.4%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,813	4,759
Archer	53%	1,813	59.5%	1,194	39.2%	42	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	619	3,049
Armstrong	52%	523	69.1%	209	27.6%	25	3.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	314	757
Atascosa	33%	3,920	58.0%	2,622	38.8%	210	3.1%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,298	6,755
Austin	39%	3,890	68.5%	1,706	30.1%	78	1.4%	3	0.1%	0	0.0%	2,184	5,677
Bailey	35%	1,163	67.7%	530	30.8%	24	1.4%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	633	1,718
Bandera	45%	2,474	68.0%	985	27.1%	176	4.8%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,489	3,637
Bastrop	38%	4,842	46.6%	5,206	50.1%	335	3.2%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	-364	10,385
Baylor	41%	669	47.2%	733	51.7%	15	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-64	1,417
Bee	39%	3,814	56.4%	2,838	42.0%	103	1.5%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	976	6,757
Bell	23%	18,596	58.4%	12,590	39.6%	631	2.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	6,006	31,817
Bexar	26%	124,138	56.8%	87,040	39.9%	7,174	3.3%	17	0.0%	0	0.0%	37,098	218,369
Blanco	52%	1,441	62.1%	790	34.1%	87	3.8%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	651	2,319
Borden	65%	258	69.2%	109	29.2%	6	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	149	373
Bosque	44%	2,891	56.5%	2,167	42.3%	59	1.2%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	724	5,118
Bowie	30%	10,211	58.0%	6,935	39.4%	474	2.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	3,276	17,620
Brazoria	32%	27,430	63.3%	14,763	34.1%	1,141	2.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	12,667	43,334
Brazos	33%	22,233	69.4%	9,120	28.5%	663	2.1%	10	0.0%	0	0.0%	13,113	32,026
Brewster	33%	1,328	59.7%	819	36.8%	77	3.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	509	2,224
Briscoe	57%	403	49.6%	401	49.4%	8	1.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2	812
Brooks	38%	592	28.3%	1,463	70.0%	34	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-871	2,089
Brown	36%	5,651	62.1%	3,333	36.6%	115	1.3%	5	0.1%	0	0.0%	2,318	9,104
Burleson	42%	2,219	52.6%	1,956	46.4%	42	1.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	263	4,217
Burnet	46%	4,254	54.8%	3,359	43.2%	146	1.9%	9	0.1%	0	0.0%	895	7,768
Caldwell	33%	2,903	46.7%	3,140	50.5%	173	2.8%	5	0.1%	0	0.0%	-237	6,221
Calhoun	42%	3,392	60.6%	2,118	37.8%	89	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,274	5,599
Callahan	47%	2,636	65.8%	1,319	32.9%	51	1.3%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,317	4,007
Cameron	20%	18,211	54.4%	14,367	42.9%	914	2.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	3,844	33,493
Camp	39%	1,496	52.2%	1,345	46.9%	24	0.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	151	2,865
Carson	58%	1,661	62.9%	921	34.9%	53	2.0%	6	0.2%	0	0.0%	740	2,641
Cass	33%	3,885	53.2%	3,355	45.9%	63	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	530	7,303
Castro	37%	1,362	63.9%	742	34.8%	27	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	620	2,131
Chambers	35%	2,986	60.9%	1,809	36.9%	107	2.2%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,177	4,902
Cherokee	30%	5,774	63.0%	3,262	35.6%	124	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,512	9,160
Childress	38%	965	58.7%	668	40.6%	12	0.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	297	1,645
Clay	44%	1,709	52.6%	1,506	46.4%	30	0.9%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	203	3,247
Cochran	35%	643	62.2%	361	34.9%	30	2.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	282	1,034
Coke	46%	787	65.5%	395	32.9%	20	1.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	392	1,202
Coleman	40%	1,921	64.8%	1,018	34.4%	24	0.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	903	2,963
Collin	38%	54,151	75.4%	15,516	21.6%	2,125	3.0%	14	0.0%	0	0.0%	38,635	71,806
Collingsworth	43%	630	55.6%	495	43.7%	9	0.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	135	1,134
Colorado	39%	3,380	63.7%	1,850	34.9%	74	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,530	5,304
Comal	39%	10,193	68.4%	4,093	27.4%	626	4.2%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	6,100	14,912
Comanche	35%	1,773	49.3%	1,773	49.3%	50	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	0	3,596
Concho	40%	577	60.8%	357	37.6%	15	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	220	949
Cooke	37%	5,359	65.5%	2,651	32.4%	170	2.1%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,708	8,183
Coryell	17%	4,666	57.0%	3,340	40.8%	176	2.1%	6	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,326	8,188
Cottle	45%	260	34.8%	474	63.4%	14	1.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-214	748
Crane	55%	1,218	73.5%	419	25.3%	20	1.2%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	799	1,658
Crockett	36%	752	74.1%	245	24.1%	18	1.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	507	1,015
Crosby	35%	1,008	57.4%	725	41.3%	24	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	283	1,757
Culberson	27%	369	60.6%	225	36.9%	15	2.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	144	609
Dallam	36%	910	65.1%	453	32.4%	34	2.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	457	1,397
Dallas	31%	254,951	60.7%	153,363	36.5%	11,660	2.8%	21	0.0%	0	0.0%	101,588	419,995
Dawson	37%	2,611	71.6%	994	27.2%	42	1.2%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,617	3,648
De Witt	32%	3,056	68.8%	1,327	29.9%	60	1.4%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,729	4,444
Deaf Smith	34%	2,896	69.8%	1,158	27.9%	91	2.2%	3	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,738	4,148
Delta	39%	753	52.3%	678	47.1%	10	0.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	75	1,441
Denton	30%	41,751	68.6%	17,132	28.1%	2,010	3.3%	5	0.0%	0	0.0%	24,619	60,898
Dickens	45%	406	45.8%	474	53.4%	7	0.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-68	887
Dimmit	50%	1,266	38.1%	2,012	60.6%	44	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-746	3,322
Donley	45%	814	61.9%	484	36.8%	18	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	330	1,316
Duval	43%	797	21.4%	2,895	77.6%	36	1.0%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	-2,098	3,729
Eastland	40%	3,429	61.0%	2,096	37.3%	98	1.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,333	5,623
Ector	29%	17,238	74.2%	5,521	23.8%	463	2.0%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	11,717	23,225
Edwards	51%	581	74.5%	184	23.6%	15	1.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	397	780
El Paso	19%	45,185	59.2%	29,033	38.1%	2,046	2.7%	26	0.0%	0	0.0%	16,152	76,290
Ellis	38%	14,227	63.2%	7,751	34.4%	530	2.4%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	6,476	22,510
Erath	33%	4,279	60.5%	2,645	37.4%	143	2.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,634	7,067
Falls	33%	1,963	44.6%	2,399	54.5%	38	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-436	4,400
Fannin	33%	2,859	46.0%	3,239	52.2%	111	1.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-380	6,209
Fayette	47%	4,630	64.3%	2,456	34.1%	119	1.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,174	7,205
Fisher	48%	742	43.1%	965	56.0%	16	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-223	1,723
Floyd	40%	1,608	68.0%	745	31.5%	11	0.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	863	2,364
Foard	45%	232	37.8%	379	61.8%	2	0.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-147	613
Fort Bend	32%	32,115	66.6%	15,310	31.7%	797	1.7%	28	0.1%	0	0.0%	16,805	48,250
Franklin	38%	1,255	57.6%	896	41.1%	29	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	359	2,180
Freestone	40%	2,729	59.1%	1,838	39.8%	53	1.1%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	891	4,621
Frio	29%	1,252	48.6%	1,279	49.7%	43	1.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	-27	2,575
Gaines	26%	1,666	70.7%	647	27.5%	41	1.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,019	2,355
Galveston	33%	26,576	51.1%	24,138	46.4%	1,241	2.4%	16	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,438	51,971
Garza	36%	829	65.0%	429	33.6%	17	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	400	1,275
Gillespie	44%	4,284	74.0%	1,297	22.4%	207	3.6%	3	0.1%	0	0.0%	2,987	5,791
Glasscock	54%	407	79.8%	95	18.6%	6	1.2%	2	0.4%	0	0.0%	312	510
Goliad	44%	1,306	67.6%	601	31.1%	24	1.2%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	705	1,931
Gonzales	32%	2,546	64.1%	1,379	34.7%	48	1.2%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,167	3,973
Gray	47%	6,043	73.8%	1,942	23.7%	203	2.5%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	4,101	8,191
Grayson	33%	13,551	58.9%	8,910	38.7%	543	2.4%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	4,641	23,005
Gregg	27%	18,485	88.6%	1,850	8.9%	530	2.5%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	16,635	20,868
Grimes	28%	2,361	59.2%	1,565	39.3%	61	1.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	796	3,987
Guadalupe	33%	10,111	66.1%	4,587	30.0%	586	3.8%	17	0.1%	0	0.0%	5,524	15,301
Hale	28%	4,632	70.1%	1,905	28.8%	71	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,727	6,608
Hall	42%	596	47.8%	636	51.0%	12	1.0%	2	0.2%	0	0.0%	-40	1,246
Hamilton	48%	1,636	56.4%	1,211	41.8%	52	1.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	425	2,899
Hansford	51%	1,677	81.6%	347	16.9%	32	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,330	2,056
Hardeman	35%	641	46.8%	714	52.2%	12	0.9%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	-73	1,369
Hardin	33%	5,497	57.6%	3,868	40.5%	176	1.8%	4	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,629	9,545
Harris	27%	327,411	60.4%	203,551	37.5%	11,277	2.1%	27	0.0%	0	0.0%	123,860	542,266
Harrison	36%	8,688	59.6%	5,611	38.5%	254	1.7%	12	0.1%	0	0.0%	3,077	14,565
Hartley	61%	1,115	71.3%	430	27.5%	18	1.2%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	685	1,564
Haskell	46%	1,216	51.5%	1,123	47.6%	22	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	93	2,361
Hays	35%	9,081	51.9%	7,823	44.7%	588	3.4%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,258	17,493
Hemphill	59%	1,120	73.4%	376	24.7%	27	1.8%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	744	1,525
Henderson	39%	9,711	56.5%	7,163	41.6%	312	1.8%	13	0.1%	0	0.0%	2,548	17,199
Hidalgo	20%	23,882	49.1%	23,369	48.1%	1,374	2.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	513	48,625
Hill	38%	4,158	54.4%	3,330	43.6%	152	2.0%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	828	7,641
Hockley	30%	3,412	69.4%	1,389	28.3%	114	2.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,023	4,915
Hood	46%	6,169	61.8%	3,558	35.7%	238	2.4%	10	0.1%	0	0.0%	2,611	9,975
Hopkins	38%	4,515	56.6%	3,381	42.4%	80	1.0%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,134	7,977
Houston	37%	3,536	60.0%	2,305	39.1%	43	0.7%	12	0.2%	0	0.0%	1,231	5,896
Howard	30%	4,332	61.4%	2,583	36.6%	143	2.0%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,749	7,059
Hudspeth	27%	350	64.9%	183	34.0%	6	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	167	539
Hunt	33%	9,814	62.3%	5,584	35.4%	344	2.2%	12	0.1%	0	0.0%	4,230	15,754
Hutchinson	47%	6,014	70.0%	2,377	27.7%	197	2.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	3,637	8,588
Irion	51%	436	72.4%	152	25.2%	13	2.2%	1	0.2%	0	0.0%	284	602
Jack	40%	1,188	57.3%	847	40.9%	38	1.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	341	2,073
Jackson	39%	2,496	66.8%	1,203	32.2%	36	1.0%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,293	3,736
Jasper	33%	3,915	52.9%	3,362	45.5%	117	1.6%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	553	7,397
Jeff Davis	45%	449	69.5%	179	27.7%	15	2.3%	3	0.5%	0	0.0%	270	646
Jefferson	36%	32,018	50.5%	30,431	48.0%	895	1.4%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,587	63,346
Jim Hogg	48%	567	34.1%	1,081	65.0%	16	1.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-514	1,664
Jim Wells	31%	3,455	43.8%	4,372	55.4%	64	0.8%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	-917	7,893
Johnson	35%	14,388	60.0%	8,909	37.2%	662	2.8%	13	0.1%	0	0.0%	5,479	23,972
Jones	35%	2,546	61.0%	1,583	37.9%	45	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	963	4,174
Karnes	36%	1,958	62.0%	1,136	36.0%	63	2.0%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	822	3,158
Kaufman	33%	6,992	57.2%	4,861	39.8%	361	3.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,131	12,214
Kendall	45%	3,617	74.7%	1,043	21.5%	183	3.8%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,574	4,844
Kenedy	46%	84	56.8%	59	39.9%	5	3.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	25	148
Kent	76%	319	55.5%	243	42.3%	13	2.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	76	575
Kerr	38%	7,477	69.8%	2,791	26.0%	447	4.2%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	4,686	10,717
Kimble	49%	1,115	73.4%	370	24.4%	33	2.2%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	745	1,519
King	73%	121	65.4%	59	31.9%	2	1.1%	3	1.6%	0	0.0%	62	185
Kinney	45%	631	60.2%	392	37.4%	25	2.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	239	1,048
Kleberg	29%	3,257	53.0%	2,800	45.5%	93	1.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	457	6,150
Knox	41%	680	47.7%	733	51.4%	14	1.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-53	1,427
La Salle	41%	513	34.2%	969	64.7%	16	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-456	1,498
Lamar	33%	6,110	57.3%	4,490	42.1%	72	0.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,620	10,672
Lamb	33%	2,313	66.2%	1,136	32.5%	45	1.3%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,177	3,496
Lampasas	38%	2,129	57.3%	1,535	41.3%	52	1.4%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	594	3,718
Lavaca	37%	3,128	59.9%	2,017	38.6%	76	1.5%	4	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,111	5,225
Lee	46%	2,446	59.1%	1,648	39.8%	44	1.1%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	798	4,139
Leon	42%	2,411	61.0%	1,503	38.0%	40	1.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	908	3,954
Liberty	31%	6,873	58.8%	4,613	39.5%	193	1.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,260	11,680
Limestone	33%	2,505	49.5%	2,502	49.4%	55	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	3	5,062
Lipscomb	55%	885	72.6%	307	25.2%	26	2.1%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	578	1,219
Live Oak	38%	1,724	66.0%	830	31.8%	59	2.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	894	2,613
Llano	57%	3,271	58.7%	2,215	39.7%	89	1.6%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,056	5,577
Loving	108%	62	75.6%	19	23.2%	1	1.2%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	43	82
Lubbock	31%	38,147	74.0%	12,526	24.3%	877	1.7%	9	0.0%	0	0.0%	25,621	51,559
Lynn	36%	1,049	62.4%	612	36.4%	20	1.2%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	437	1,682
Madison	7%	293	49.9%	290	49.4%	4	0.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	3	587
Marion	42%	1,730	55.2%	1,348	43.0%	54	1.7%	3	0.1%	0	0.0%	382	3,135
Martin	36%	838	70.9%	333	28.2%	11	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	505	1,182
Mason	49%	840	65.4%	422	32.9%	22	1.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	418	1,284
Matagorda	36%	5,310	58.9%	3,547	39.4%	151	1.7%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,763	9,011
Maverick	21%	2,147	45.2%	2,486	52.4%	112	2.4%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	-339	4,746
McCulloch	40%	1,610	63.3%	912	35.9%	21	0.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	698	2,543
McLennan	36%	28,094	55.3%	22,121	43.5%	631	1.2%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	5,973	50,846
McMullen	53%	249	76.4%	74	22.7%	3	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	175	326
Medina	36%	4,358	63.3%	2,317	33.7%	205	3.0%	4	0.1%	0	0.0%	2,041	6,884
Menard	54%	593	64.3%	319	34.6%	10	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	274	922
Midland	42%	24,496	79.9%	5,379	17.5%	776	2.5%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	19,117	30,654
Milam	41%	2,907	42.9%	3,787	55.9%	83	1.2%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	-880	6,778
Mills	46%	858	54.3%	686	43.4%	35	2.2%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	172	1,579
Mitchell	41%	1,490	62.0%	896	37.3%	19	0.8%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	594	2,405
Montague	38%	2,799	56.4%	2,032	40.9%	88	1.8%	46	0.9%	0	0.0%	767	4,965
Montgomery	35%	31,806	70.6%	12,266	27.2%	942	2.1%	29	0.1%	0	0.0%	19,540	45,043
Moore	37%	3,167	71.2%	1,191	26.8%	84	1.9%	8	0.2%	0	0.0%	1,976	4,450
Morris	40%	1,704	44.3%	2,107	54.7%	38	1.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-403	3,849
Motley	51%	403	66.8%	192	31.8%	8	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	211	603
Nacogdoches	30%	8,365	65.9%	4,056	32.0%	268	2.1%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	4,309	12,691
Navarro	36%	5,826	55.3%	4,508	42.8%	196	1.9%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,318	10,533
Newton	33%	1,246	39.6%	1,862	59.2%	37	1.2%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	-616	3,147
Nolan	35%	2,561	60.5%	1,583	37.4%	87	2.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	978	4,231
Nueces	30%	36,102	59.2%	23,711	38.9%	1,199	2.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	12,391	61,012
Ochiltree	45%	2,386	84.0%	399	14.0%	53	1.9%	3	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,987	2,841
Oldham	56%	512	68.2%	224	29.8%	15	2.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	288	751
Orange	35%	9,954	49.8%	9,628	48.2%	379	1.9%	14	0.1%	0	0.0%	326	19,975
Palo Pinto	36%	3,705	56.4%	2,715	41.3%	142	2.2%	7	0.1%	0	0.0%	990	6,569
Panola	38%	3,417	56.3%	2,566	42.3%	79	1.3%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	851	6,064
Parker	39%	11,245	62.4%	6,224	34.5%	553	3.1%	10	0.1%	0	0.0%	5,021	18,032
Parmer	32%	1,417	66.3%	678	31.7%	38	1.8%	4	0.2%	0	0.0%	739	2,137
Pecos	41%	2,471	62.3%	1,416	35.7%	82	2.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,055	3,969
Polk	39%	4,869	54.8%	3,839	43.2%	182	2.0%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,030	8,893
Potter	29%	12,991	64.8%	6,493	32.4%	549	2.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	6,498	20,034
Presidio	36%	649	40.5%	933	58.2%	20	1.2%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	-284	1,604
Rains	41%	1,097	53.4%	926	45.1%	31	1.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	171	2,054
Randall	45%	22,460	77.1%	6,156	21.1%	518	1.8%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	16,304	29,137
Reagan	37%	864	83.0%	173	16.6%	3	0.3%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	691	1,041
Real	59%	785	70.7%	299	26.9%	27	2.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	486	1,111
Red River	36%	1,948	50.2%	1,888	48.7%	44	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	60	3,880
Reeves	28%	1,536	52.2%	1,360	46.2%	45	1.5%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	176	2,942
Refugio	49%	1,670	60.0%	1,073	38.6%	40	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	597	2,783
Roberts	73%	393	75.0%	123	23.5%	8	1.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	270	524
Robertson	42%	2,001	43.1%	2,601	56.0%	43	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-600	4,645
Rockwall	43%	5,660	73.2%	1,851	23.9%	226	2.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	3,809	7,737
Runnels	38%	2,132	68.2%	946	30.3%	44	1.4%	4	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,186	3,126
Rusk	35%	7,413	67.7%	3,361	30.7%	182	1.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	4,052	10,957
Sabine	40%	1,555	51.5%	1,414	46.9%	44	1.5%	4	0.1%	0	0.0%	141	3,017
San Augustine	47%	1,500	52.7%	1,291	45.4%	54	1.9%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	209	2,846
San Jacinto	34%	2,239	55.7%	1,708	42.5%	74	1.8%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	531	4,023
San Patricio	28%	6,492	57.7%	4,525	40.2%	229	2.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,967	11,246
San Saba	38%	801	51.8%	729	47.2%	15	1.0%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	72	1,546
Schleicher	43%	620	71.4%	240	27.6%	7	0.8%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	380	868
Scurry	32%	3,000	72.8%	1,059	25.7%	63	1.5%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,941	4,122
Shackelford	47%	776	69.0%	334	29.7%	15	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	442	1,125
Shelby	34%	3,090	55.4%	2,334	41.8%	153	2.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	756	5,578
Sherman	54%	749	68.7%	281	25.8%	57	5.2%	3	0.3%	0	0.0%	468	1,090
Smith	37%	27,984	68.6%	12,025	29.5%	786	1.9%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	15,959	40,796
Somervell	50%	1,107	60.4%	666	36.3%	59	3.2%	1	0.1%	0	0.0%	441	1,833
Starr	17%	988	23.6%	3,144	75.1%	54	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-2,156	4,186
Stephens	43%	1,967	69.5%	826	29.2%	35	1.2%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,141	2,829
Sterling	50%	396	82.2%	80	16.6%	5	1.0%	1	0.2%	0	0.0%	316	482
Stonewall	55%	386	46.3%	437	52.4%	11	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-51	834
Sutton	36%	764	74.2%	259	25.2%	6	0.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	505	1,029
Swisher	41%	1,027	44.7%	1,244	54.1%	27	1.2%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	-217	2,300
Tarrant	34%	175,629	60.8%	104,985	36.3%	8,147	2.8%	89	0.0%	0	0.0%	70,644	288,850
Taylor	34%	21,220	72.4%	7,603	25.9%	485	1.7%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	13,617	29,310
Terrell	47%	242	52.6%	213	46.3%	5	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	29	460
Terry	39%	2,268	66.5%	1,087	31.9%	53	1.6%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,181	3,409
Throckmorton	53%	424	55.5%	327	42.8%	13	1.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	97	764
Titus	34%	3,215	56.1%	2,460	42.9%	58	1.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	755	5,733
Tom Green	33%	16,730	71.2%	6,321	26.9%	434	1.8%	12	0.1%	0	0.0%	10,409	23,497
Travis	44%	87,145	45.4%	98,983	51.6%	5,833	3.0%	9	0.0%	0	0.0%	-11,838	191,970
Trinity	41%	2,008	55.5%	1,567	43.3%	41	1.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	441	3,616
Tyler	38%	2,480	53.0%	2,139	45.7%	59	1.3%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	341	4,679
Upshur	37%	4,755	57.3%	3,391	40.9%	152	1.8%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,364	8,301
Upton	46%	1,010	77.8%	261	20.1%	25	1.9%	3	0.2%	0	0.0%	749	1,299
Uvalde	34%	3,384	62.6%	1,923	35.5%	99	1.8%	4	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,461	5,410
Val Verde	26%	3,394	51.1%	3,125	47.0%	125	1.9%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	269	6,645
Van Zandt	37%	6,221	59.8%	4,014	38.6%	165	1.6%	5	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,207	10,405
Victoria	35%	12,750	70.8%	5,001	27.8%	256	1.4%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	7,749	18,007
Walker	25%	6,810	65.2%	3,452	33.1%	177	1.7%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	3,358	10,440
Waller	36%	3,271	51.4%	3,012	47.4%	73	1.1%	4	0.1%	0	0.0%	259	6,360
Ward	37%	2,185	67.3%	996	30.7%	65	2.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,189	3,246
Washington	44%	6,069	70.0%	2,490	28.7%	108	1.2%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	3,579	8,668
Webb	17%	6,982	48.8%	7,026	49.2%	285	2.0%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	-44	14,294
Wharton	32%	5,629	62.6%	3,250	36.1%	114	1.3%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,379	8,993
Wheeler	51%	1,458	66.9%	689	31.6%	29	1.3%	2	0.1%	0	0.0%	769	2,178
Wichita	34%	18,038	58.9%	12,002	39.2%	588	1.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	6,036	30,628
Wilbarger	31%	1,974	57.3%	1,441	41.8%	29	0.8%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	533	3,445
Willacy	32%	1,719	47.9%	1,814	50.5%	56	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-95	3,589
Williamson	41%	23,068	58.9%	15,033	38.4%	1,033	2.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	8,035	39,134
Wilson	42%	3,746	57.0%	2,664	40.5%	162	2.5%	1	0.0%	0	0.0%	1,082	6,573
Winkler	31%	1,247	70.5%	494	27.9%	28	1.6%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	753	1,769
Wise	37%	4,957	53.7%	3,993	43.3%	276	3.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	964	9,226
Wood	38%	5,425	64.0%	2,869	33.8%	183	2.2%	2	0.0%	0	0.0%	2,556	8,479
Yoakum	28%	1,172	71.4%	436	26.6%	34	2.1%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	736	1,642
Young	44%	3,862	65.9%	1,918	32.7%	76	1.3%	4	0.1%	0	0.0%	1,944	5,860
Zapata	28%	767	46.0%	889	53.3%	12	0.7%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-122	1,668
Zavala	30%	531	22.8%	1,777	76.3%	20	0.9%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	-1,246	2,328
TOTAL	31%	2,302,357	60.2%	1,429,986	37.4%	89,089	2.3%	725	0.0%	0	0.0%	872,371	3,822,157
Total R vote: 2,302,357 (60.2%)      Total D vote: 1,429,986 (37.4%)      Total Other vote: 89,814 (2.3%)
* incumbent
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Total Disbursements:		$12,474,887		$1,767,311		$0		$0
Total Receipts:		$16,268,341		$1,767,574		$0		$0
Cash on Hand:		$4,147,378		$264		$0		$0
Contributions by Candidate:		$0		$2,749		$0		$0
Loans by Candidate:		$0		$127,149		$0		$0
Total Individual Contributions:		$12,002,897		$947,452		$0		$0
Party Contributions:		$20,026		$17,500		$0		$0
Other Committee Contributions:		$1,817,895		$263,762		$0		$0
Transfers from Other Committees:		$175,316		$87,475		$0		$0
Independent Expenditures Supporting:		$1,443		$171		$0		$0
Independent Expenditures Opposing:		$0		$265		$0		$0
Net Independent Expenditures:		$1,443		$-94		$0		$0
Net Spending:		$12,476,330		$1,767,217		$0		$0

1990 Senate class 2, Anderson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,263	61.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,826	37.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	167	1.6%
Ira Calkins (I)	5	0.0%
TOTAL	10,261
Turnout: 28%

1990 Senate class 2, Andrews County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,152	78.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	530	19.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	48	1.8%
TOTAL	2,730
Turnout: 29%

1990 Senate class 2, Angelina County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	9,522	57.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	6,828	41.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	259	1.6%
TOTAL	16,609
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Aransas County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,229	67.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,416	29.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	112	2.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	4,759
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Archer County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,813	59.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,194	39.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	42	1.4%
TOTAL	3,049
Turnout: 53%

1990 Senate class 2, Armstrong County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	523	69.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	209	27.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	25	3.3%
TOTAL	757
Turnout: 52%

1990 Senate class 2, Atascosa County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,920	58.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,622	38.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	210	3.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	6,755
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Austin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,890	68.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,706	30.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	78	1.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.1%
TOTAL	5,677
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Bailey County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,163	67.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	530	30.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	24	1.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,718
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Bandera County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,474	68.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	985	27.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	176	4.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	3,637
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Bastrop County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,842	46.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	5,206	50.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	335	3.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	10,385
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Baylor County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	669	47.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	733	51.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	1.1%
TOTAL	1,417
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Bee County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,814	56.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,838	42.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	103	1.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	6,757
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Bell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	18,596	58.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	12,590	39.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	631	2.0%
TOTAL	31,817
Turnout: 23%

1990 Senate class 2, Bexar County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	124,138	56.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	87,040	39.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	7,174	3.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	17	0.0%
TOTAL	218,369
Turnout: 26%

1990 Senate class 2, Blanco County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,441	62.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	790	34.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	87	3.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	2,319
Turnout: 52%

1990 Senate class 2, Borden County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	258	69.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	109	29.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	6	1.6%
TOTAL	373
Turnout: 65%

1990 Senate class 2, Bosque County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,891	56.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,167	42.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	59	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	5,118
Turnout: 44%

1990 Senate class 2, Bowie County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	10,211	58.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	6,935	39.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	474	2.7%
TOTAL	17,620
Turnout: 30%

1990 Senate class 2, Brazoria County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	27,430	63.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	14,763	34.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	1,141	2.6%
TOTAL	43,334
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Brazos County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	22,233	69.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	9,120	28.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	663	2.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	10	0.0%
TOTAL	32,026
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Brewster County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,328	59.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	819	36.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	77	3.5%
TOTAL	2,224
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Briscoe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	403	49.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	401	49.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	8	1.0%
TOTAL	812
Turnout: 57%

1990 Senate class 2, Brooks County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	592	28.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,463	70.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	34	1.6%
TOTAL	2,089
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Brown County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,651	62.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,333	36.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	115	1.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	5	0.1%
TOTAL	9,104
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Burleson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,219	52.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,956	46.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	42	1.0%
TOTAL	4,217
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Burnet County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,254	54.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,359	43.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	146	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	9	0.1%
TOTAL	7,768
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Caldwell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,903	46.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,140	50.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	173	2.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	5	0.1%
TOTAL	6,221
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Calhoun County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,392	60.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,118	37.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	89	1.6%
TOTAL	5,599
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Callahan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,636	65.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,319	32.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	51	1.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	4,007
Turnout: 47%

1990 Senate class 2, Cameron County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	18,211	54.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	14,367	42.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	914	2.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	33,493
Turnout: 20%

1990 Senate class 2, Camp County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,496	52.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,345	46.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	24	0.8%
TOTAL	2,865
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Carson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,661	62.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	921	34.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	53	2.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	6	0.2%
TOTAL	2,641
Turnout: 58%

1990 Senate class 2, Cass County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,885	53.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,355	45.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	63	0.9%
TOTAL	7,303
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Castro County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,362	63.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	742	34.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	27	1.3%
TOTAL	2,131
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Chambers County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,986	60.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,809	36.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	107	2.2%
TOTAL	4,902
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Cherokee County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,774	63.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,262	35.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	124	1.4%
TOTAL	9,160
Turnout: 30%

1990 Senate class 2, Childress County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	965	58.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	668	40.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	12	0.7%
TOTAL	1,645
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Clay County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,709	52.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,506	46.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	30	0.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	3,247
Turnout: 44%

1990 Senate class 2, Cochran County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	643	62.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	361	34.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	30	2.9%
TOTAL	1,034
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Coke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	787	65.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	395	32.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	20	1.7%
TOTAL	1,202
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Coleman County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,921	64.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,018	34.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	24	0.8%
TOTAL	2,963
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, Collin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	54,151	75.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	15,516	21.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	2,125	3.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	14	0.0%
TOTAL	71,806
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Collingsworth County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	630	55.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	495	43.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	9	0.8%
TOTAL	1,134
Turnout: 43%

1990 Senate class 2, Colorado County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,380	63.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,850	34.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	74	1.4%
TOTAL	5,304
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Comal County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	10,193	68.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,093	27.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	626	4.2%
TOTAL	14,912
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Comanche County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,773	49.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,773	49.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	50	1.4%
TOTAL	3,596
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Concho County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	577	60.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	357	37.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	1.6%
TOTAL	949
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, Cooke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,359	65.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,651	32.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	170	2.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	8,183
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Coryell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,666	57.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,340	40.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	176	2.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	6	0.1%
TOTAL	8,188
Turnout: 17%

1990 Senate class 2, Cottle County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	260	34.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	474	63.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	14	1.9%
TOTAL	748
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Crane County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,218	73.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	419	25.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	20	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,658
Turnout: 55%

1990 Senate class 2, Crockett County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	752	74.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	245	24.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	18	1.8%
TOTAL	1,015
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Crosby County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,008	57.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	725	41.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	24	1.4%
TOTAL	1,757
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Culberson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	369	60.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	225	36.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	2.5%
TOTAL	609
Turnout: 27%

1990 Senate class 2, Dallam County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	910	65.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	453	32.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	34	2.4%
TOTAL	1,397
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Dallas County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	254,951	60.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	153,363	36.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	11,660	2.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	21	0.0%
TOTAL	419,995
Turnout: 31%

1990 Senate class 2, Dawson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,611	71.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	994	27.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	42	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	3,648
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, De Witt County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,056	68.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,327	29.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	60	1.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	4,444
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Deaf Smith County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,896	69.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,158	27.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	91	2.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.1%
TOTAL	4,148
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, Delta County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	753	52.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	678	47.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	10	0.7%
TOTAL	1,441
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Denton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	41,751	68.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	17,132	28.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	2,010	3.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	5	0.0%
TOTAL	60,898
Turnout: 30%

1990 Senate class 2, Dickens County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	406	45.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	474	53.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	7	0.8%
TOTAL	887
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Dimmit County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,266	38.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,012	60.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	44	1.3%
TOTAL	3,322
Turnout: 50%

1990 Senate class 2, Donley County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	814	61.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	484	36.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	18	1.4%
TOTAL	1,316
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Duval County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	797	21.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,895	77.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	36	1.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	3,729
Turnout: 43%

1990 Senate class 2, Eastland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,429	61.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,096	37.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	98	1.7%
TOTAL	5,623
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, Ector County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	17,238	74.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	5,521	23.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	463	2.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	23,225
Turnout: 29%

1990 Senate class 2, Edwards County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	581	74.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	184	23.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	1.9%
TOTAL	780
Turnout: 51%

1990 Senate class 2, El Paso County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	45,185	59.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	29,033	38.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	2,046	2.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	26	0.0%
TOTAL	76,290
Turnout: 19%

1990 Senate class 2, Ellis County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	14,227	63.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	7,751	34.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	530	2.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	22,510
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Erath County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,279	60.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,645	37.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	143	2.0%
TOTAL	7,067
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Falls County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,963	44.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,399	54.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	38	0.9%
TOTAL	4,400
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Fannin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,859	46.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,239	52.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	111	1.8%
TOTAL	6,209
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Fayette County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,630	64.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,456	34.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	119	1.7%
TOTAL	7,205
Turnout: 47%

1990 Senate class 2, Fisher County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	742	43.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	965	56.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	16	0.9%
TOTAL	1,723
Turnout: 48%

1990 Senate class 2, Floyd County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,608	68.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	745	31.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	11	0.5%
TOTAL	2,364
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, Foard County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	232	37.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	379	61.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	2	0.3%
TOTAL	613
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Fort Bend County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	32,115	66.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	15,310	31.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	797	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	28	0.1%
TOTAL	48,250
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Franklin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,255	57.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	896	41.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	29	1.3%
TOTAL	2,180
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Freestone County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,729	59.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,838	39.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	53	1.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	4,621
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, Frio County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,252	48.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,279	49.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	43	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	2,575
Turnout: 29%

1990 Senate class 2, Gaines County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,666	70.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	647	27.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	41	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	2,355
Turnout: 26%

1990 Senate class 2, Galveston County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	26,576	51.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	24,138	46.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	1,241	2.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	16	0.0%
TOTAL	51,971
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Garza County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	829	65.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	429	33.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	17	1.3%
TOTAL	1,275
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Gillespie County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,284	74.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,297	22.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	207	3.6%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.1%
TOTAL	5,791
Turnout: 44%

1990 Senate class 2, Glasscock County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	407	79.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	95	18.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	6	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.4%
TOTAL	510
Turnout: 54%

1990 Senate class 2, Goliad County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,306	67.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	601	31.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	24	1.2%
TOTAL	1,931
Turnout: 44%

1990 Senate class 2, Gonzales County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,546	64.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,379	34.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	48	1.2%
TOTAL	3,973
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Gray County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,043	73.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,942	23.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	203	2.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	8,191
Turnout: 47%

1990 Senate class 2, Grayson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	13,551	58.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	8,910	38.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	543	2.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	23,005
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Gregg County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	18,485	88.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,850	8.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	530	2.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	20,868
Turnout: 27%

1990 Senate class 2, Grimes County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,361	59.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,565	39.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	61	1.5%
TOTAL	3,987
Turnout: 28%

1990 Senate class 2, Guadalupe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	10,111	66.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,587	30.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	586	3.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	17	0.1%
TOTAL	15,301
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Hale County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,632	70.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,905	28.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	71	1.1%
TOTAL	6,608
Turnout: 28%

1990 Senate class 2, Hall County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	596	47.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	636	51.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	12	1.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.2%
TOTAL	1,246
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Hamilton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,636	56.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,211	41.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	52	1.8%
TOTAL	2,899
Turnout: 48%

1990 Senate class 2, Hansford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,677	81.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	347	16.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	32	1.6%
TOTAL	2,056
Turnout: 51%

1990 Senate class 2, Hardeman County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	641	46.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	714	52.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	12	0.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	1,369
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Hardin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,497	57.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,868	40.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	176	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.0%
TOTAL	9,545
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Harris County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	327,411	60.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	203,551	37.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	11,277	2.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	27	0.0%
TOTAL	542,266
Turnout: 27%

1990 Senate class 2, Harrison County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	8,688	59.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	5,611	38.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	254	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	12	0.1%
TOTAL	14,565
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Hartley County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,115	71.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	430	27.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	18	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,564
Turnout: 61%

1990 Senate class 2, Haskell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,216	51.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,123	47.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	22	0.9%
TOTAL	2,361
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Hays County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	9,081	51.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	7,823	44.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	588	3.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	17,493
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Hemphill County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,120	73.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	376	24.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	27	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	1,525
Turnout: 59%

1990 Senate class 2, Henderson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	9,711	56.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	7,163	41.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	312	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	13	0.1%
TOTAL	17,199
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Hidalgo County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	23,882	49.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	23,369	48.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	1,374	2.8%
TOTAL	48,625
Turnout: 20%

1990 Senate class 2, Hill County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,158	54.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,330	43.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	152	2.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	7,641
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Hockley County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,412	69.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,389	28.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	114	2.3%
TOTAL	4,915
Turnout: 30%

1990 Senate class 2, Hood County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,169	61.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,558	35.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	238	2.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	10	0.1%
TOTAL	9,975
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Hopkins County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,515	56.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,381	42.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	80	1.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	7,977
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Houston County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,536	60.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,305	39.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	43	0.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	12	0.2%
TOTAL	5,896
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Howard County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,332	61.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,583	36.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	143	2.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	7,059
Turnout: 30%

1990 Senate class 2, Hudspeth County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	350	64.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	183	34.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	6	1.1%
TOTAL	539
Turnout: 27%

1990 Senate class 2, Hunt County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	9,814	62.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	5,584	35.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	344	2.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	12	0.1%
TOTAL	15,754
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Hutchinson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,014	70.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,377	27.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	197	2.3%
TOTAL	8,588
Turnout: 47%

1990 Senate class 2, Irion County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	436	72.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	152	25.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	13	2.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.2%
TOTAL	602
Turnout: 51%

1990 Senate class 2, Jack County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,188	57.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	847	40.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	38	1.8%
TOTAL	2,073
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, Jackson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,496	66.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,203	32.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	36	1.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	3,736
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Jasper County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,915	52.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,362	45.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	117	1.6%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	7,397
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Jeff Davis County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	449	69.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	179	27.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	2.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.5%
TOTAL	646
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Jefferson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	32,018	50.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	30,431	48.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	895	1.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	63,346
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Jim Hogg County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	567	34.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,081	65.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	16	1.0%
TOTAL	1,664
Turnout: 48%

1990 Senate class 2, Jim Wells County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,455	43.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,372	55.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	64	0.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	7,893
Turnout: 31%

1990 Senate class 2, Johnson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	14,388	60.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	8,909	37.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	662	2.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	13	0.1%
TOTAL	23,972
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Jones County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,546	61.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,583	37.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	45	1.1%
TOTAL	4,174
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Karnes County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,958	62.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,136	36.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	63	2.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	3,158
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Kaufman County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,992	57.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,861	39.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	361	3.0%
TOTAL	12,214
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Kendall County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,617	74.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,043	21.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	183	3.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	4,844
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Kenedy County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	84	56.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	59	39.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	5	3.4%
TOTAL	148
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Kent County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	319	55.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	243	42.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	13	2.3%
TOTAL	575
Turnout: 76%

1990 Senate class 2, Kerr County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	7,477	69.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,791	26.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	447	4.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	10,717
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Kimble County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,115	73.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	370	24.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	33	2.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,519
Turnout: 49%

1990 Senate class 2, King County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	121	65.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	59	31.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	2	1.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	1.6%
TOTAL	185
Turnout: 73%

1990 Senate class 2, Kinney County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	631	60.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	392	37.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	25	2.4%
TOTAL	1,048
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Kleberg County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,257	53.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,800	45.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	93	1.5%
TOTAL	6,150
Turnout: 29%

1990 Senate class 2, Knox County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	680	47.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	733	51.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	14	1.0%
TOTAL	1,427
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, La Salle County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	513	34.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	969	64.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	16	1.1%
TOTAL	1,498
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Lamar County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,110	57.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,490	42.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	72	0.7%
TOTAL	10,672
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Lamb County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,313	66.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,136	32.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	45	1.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	3,496
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Lampasas County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,129	57.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,535	41.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	52	1.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	3,718
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Lavaca County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,128	59.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,017	38.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	76	1.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.1%
TOTAL	5,225
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Lee County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,446	59.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,648	39.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	44	1.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	4,139
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Leon County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,411	61.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,503	38.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	40	1.0%
TOTAL	3,954
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Liberty County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,873	58.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,613	39.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	193	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	11,680
Turnout: 31%

1990 Senate class 2, Limestone County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,505	49.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,502	49.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	55	1.1%
TOTAL	5,062
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Lipscomb County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	885	72.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	307	25.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	26	2.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,219
Turnout: 55%

1990 Senate class 2, Live Oak County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,724	66.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	830	31.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	59	2.3%
TOTAL	2,613
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Llano County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,271	58.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,215	39.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	89	1.6%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	5,577
Turnout: 57%

1990 Senate class 2, Loving County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	62	75.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	19	23.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	1	1.2%
TOTAL	82
Turnout: 108%

1990 Senate class 2, Lubbock County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	38,147	74.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	12,526	24.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	877	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	9	0.0%
TOTAL	51,559
Turnout: 31%

1990 Senate class 2, Lynn County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,049	62.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	612	36.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	20	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,682
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Madison County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	293	49.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	290	49.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	4	0.7%
TOTAL	587
Turnout: 7%

1990 Senate class 2, Marion County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,730	55.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,348	43.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	54	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.1%
TOTAL	3,135
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Martin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	838	70.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	333	28.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	11	0.9%
TOTAL	1,182
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Mason County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	840	65.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	422	32.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	22	1.7%
TOTAL	1,284
Turnout: 49%

1990 Senate class 2, Matagorda County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,310	58.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,547	39.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	151	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	9,011
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Maverick County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,147	45.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,486	52.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	112	2.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	4,746
Turnout: 21%

1990 Senate class 2, McCulloch County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,610	63.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	912	35.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	21	0.8%
TOTAL	2,543
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, McLennan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	28,094	55.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	22,121	43.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	631	1.2%
TOTAL	50,846
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, McMullen County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	249	76.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	74	22.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	3	0.9%
TOTAL	326
Turnout: 53%

1990 Senate class 2, Medina County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,358	63.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,317	33.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	205	3.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.1%
TOTAL	6,884
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Menard County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	593	64.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	319	34.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	10	1.1%
TOTAL	922
Turnout: 54%

1990 Senate class 2, Midland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	24,496	79.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	5,379	17.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	776	2.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	30,654
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Milam County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,907	42.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,787	55.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	83	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	6,778
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Mills County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	858	54.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	686	43.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	35	2.2%
TOTAL	1,579
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Mitchell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,490	62.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	896	37.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	19	0.8%
TOTAL	2,405
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Montague County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,799	56.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,032	40.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	88	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	46	0.9%
TOTAL	4,965
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Montgomery County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	31,806	70.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	12,266	27.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	942	2.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	29	0.1%
TOTAL	45,043
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Moore County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,167	71.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,191	26.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	84	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	8	0.2%
TOTAL	4,450
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Morris County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,704	44.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,107	54.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	38	1.0%
TOTAL	3,849
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, Motley County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	403	66.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	192	31.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	8	1.3%
TOTAL	603
Turnout: 51%

1990 Senate class 2, Nacogdoches County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	8,365	65.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,056	32.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	268	2.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	12,691
Turnout: 30%

1990 Senate class 2, Navarro County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,826	55.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,508	42.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	196	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	10,533
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Newton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,246	39.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,862	59.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	37	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	3,147
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Nolan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,561	60.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,583	37.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	87	2.1%
TOTAL	4,231
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Nueces County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	36,102	59.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	23,711	38.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	1,199	2.0%
TOTAL	61,012
Turnout: 30%

1990 Senate class 2, Ochiltree County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,386	84.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	399	14.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	53	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.1%
TOTAL	2,841
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Oldham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	512	68.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	224	29.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	2.0%
TOTAL	751
Turnout: 56%

1990 Senate class 2, Orange County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	9,954	49.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	9,628	48.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	379	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	14	0.1%
TOTAL	19,975
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Palo Pinto County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,705	56.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,715	41.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	142	2.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	7	0.1%
TOTAL	6,569
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Panola County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,417	56.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,566	42.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	79	1.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	6,064
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Parker County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	11,245	62.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	6,224	34.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	553	3.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	10	0.1%
TOTAL	18,032
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Parmer County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,417	66.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	678	31.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	38	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.2%
TOTAL	2,137
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Pecos County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,471	62.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,416	35.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	82	2.1%
TOTAL	3,969
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Polk County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,869	54.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,839	43.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	182	2.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	8,893
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Potter County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	12,991	64.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	6,493	32.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	549	2.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	20,034
Turnout: 29%

1990 Senate class 2, Presidio County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	649	40.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	933	58.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	20	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	1,604
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Rains County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,097	53.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	926	45.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	31	1.5%
TOTAL	2,054
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Randall County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	22,460	77.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	6,156	21.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	518	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	29,137
Turnout: 45%

1990 Senate class 2, Reagan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	864	83.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	173	16.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	3	0.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,041
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Real County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	785	70.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	299	26.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	27	2.4%
TOTAL	1,111
Turnout: 59%

1990 Senate class 2, Red River County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,948	50.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,888	48.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	44	1.1%
TOTAL	3,880
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Reeves County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,536	52.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,360	46.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	45	1.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	2,942
Turnout: 28%

1990 Senate class 2, Refugio County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,670	60.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,073	38.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	40	1.4%
TOTAL	2,783
Turnout: 49%

1990 Senate class 2, Roberts County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	393	75.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	123	23.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	8	1.5%
TOTAL	524
Turnout: 73%

1990 Senate class 2, Robertson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,001	43.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,601	56.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	43	0.9%
TOTAL	4,645
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Rockwall County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,660	73.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,851	23.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	226	2.9%
TOTAL	7,737
Turnout: 43%

1990 Senate class 2, Runnels County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,132	68.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	946	30.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	44	1.4%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.1%
TOTAL	3,126
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Rusk County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	7,413	67.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,361	30.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	182	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	10,957
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Sabine County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,555	51.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,414	46.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	44	1.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.1%
TOTAL	3,017
Turnout: 40%

1990 Senate class 2, San Augustine County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,500	52.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,291	45.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	54	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	2,846
Turnout: 47%

1990 Senate class 2, San Jacinto County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,239	55.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,708	42.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	74	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	4,023
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, San Patricio County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,492	57.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,525	40.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	229	2.0%
TOTAL	11,246
Turnout: 28%

1990 Senate class 2, San Saba County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	801	51.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	729	47.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	1.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,546
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Schleicher County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	620	71.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	240	27.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	7	0.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	868
Turnout: 43%

1990 Senate class 2, Scurry County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,000	72.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,059	25.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	63	1.5%
TOTAL	4,122
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Shackelford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	776	69.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	334	29.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	15	1.3%
TOTAL	1,125
Turnout: 47%

1990 Senate class 2, Shelby County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,090	55.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,334	41.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	153	2.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	5,578
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, Sherman County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	749	68.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	281	25.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	57	5.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.3%
TOTAL	1,090
Turnout: 54%

1990 Senate class 2, Smith County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	27,984	68.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	12,025	29.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	786	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	40,796
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Somervell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,107	60.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	666	36.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	59	3.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.1%
TOTAL	1,833
Turnout: 50%

1990 Senate class 2, Starr County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	988	23.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,144	75.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	54	1.3%
TOTAL	4,186
Turnout: 17%

1990 Senate class 2, Stephens County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,967	69.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	826	29.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	35	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	2,829
Turnout: 43%

1990 Senate class 2, Sterling County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	396	82.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	80	16.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	5	1.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.2%
TOTAL	482
Turnout: 50%

1990 Senate class 2, Stonewall County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	386	46.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	437	52.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	11	1.3%
TOTAL	834
Turnout: 55%

1990 Senate class 2, Sutton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	764	74.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	259	25.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	6	0.6%
TOTAL	1,029
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Swisher County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,027	44.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,244	54.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	27	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	2,300
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Tarrant County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	175,629	60.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	104,985	36.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	8,147	2.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	89	0.0%
TOTAL	288,850
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, Taylor County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	21,220	72.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	7,603	25.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	485	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	29,310
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, Terrell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	242	52.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	213	46.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	5	1.1%
TOTAL	460
Turnout: 47%

1990 Senate class 2, Terry County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,268	66.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,087	31.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	53	1.6%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	3,409
Turnout: 39%

1990 Senate class 2, Throckmorton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	424	55.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	327	42.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	13	1.7%
TOTAL	764
Turnout: 53%

1990 Senate class 2, Titus County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,215	56.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,460	42.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	58	1.0%
TOTAL	5,733
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, Tom Green County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	16,730	71.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	6,321	26.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	434	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	12	0.1%
TOTAL	23,497
Turnout: 33%

1990 Senate class 2, Travis County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	87,145	45.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	98,983	51.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	5,833	3.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	9	0.0%
TOTAL	191,970
Turnout: 44%

1990 Senate class 2, Trinity County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,008	55.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,567	43.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	41	1.1%
TOTAL	3,616
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Tyler County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,480	53.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,139	45.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	59	1.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	4,679
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Upshur County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,755	57.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,391	40.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	152	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	8,301
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Upton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,010	77.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	261	20.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	25	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	3	0.2%
TOTAL	1,299
Turnout: 46%

1990 Senate class 2, Uvalde County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,384	62.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,923	35.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	99	1.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.1%
TOTAL	5,410
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, Val Verde County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,394	51.1%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,125	47.0%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	125	1.9%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	6,645
Turnout: 26%

1990 Senate class 2, Van Zandt County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,221	59.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	4,014	38.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	165	1.6%
Ira Calkins (I)	5	0.0%
TOTAL	10,405
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Victoria County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	12,750	70.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	5,001	27.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	256	1.4%
TOTAL	18,007
Turnout: 35%

1990 Senate class 2, Walker County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,810	65.2%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,452	33.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	177	1.7%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	10,440
Turnout: 25%

1990 Senate class 2, Waller County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,271	51.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,012	47.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	73	1.1%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.1%
TOTAL	6,360
Turnout: 36%

1990 Senate class 2, Ward County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	2,185	67.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	996	30.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	65	2.0%
TOTAL	3,246
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Washington County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,069	70.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,490	28.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	108	1.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	8,668
Turnout: 44%

1990 Senate class 2, Webb County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	6,982	48.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	7,026	49.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	285	2.0%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	14,294
Turnout: 17%

1990 Senate class 2, Wharton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,629	62.6%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,250	36.1%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	114	1.3%
TOTAL	8,993
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Wheeler County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,458	66.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	689	31.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	29	1.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.1%
TOTAL	2,178
Turnout: 51%

1990 Senate class 2, Wichita County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	18,038	58.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	12,002	39.2%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	588	1.9%
TOTAL	30,628
Turnout: 34%

1990 Senate class 2, Wilbarger County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,974	57.3%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,441	41.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	29	0.8%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	3,445
Turnout: 31%

1990 Senate class 2, Willacy County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,719	47.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,814	50.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	56	1.6%
TOTAL	3,589
Turnout: 32%

1990 Senate class 2, Williamson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	23,068	58.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	15,033	38.4%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	1,033	2.6%
TOTAL	39,134
Turnout: 41%

1990 Senate class 2, Wilson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,746	57.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,664	40.5%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	162	2.5%
Ira Calkins (I)	1	0.0%
TOTAL	6,573
Turnout: 42%

1990 Senate class 2, Winkler County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,247	70.5%
Hugh Parmer (D)	494	27.9%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	28	1.6%
TOTAL	1,769
Turnout: 31%

1990 Senate class 2, Wise County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	4,957	53.7%
Hugh Parmer (D)	3,993	43.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	276	3.0%
TOTAL	9,226
Turnout: 37%

1990 Senate class 2, Wood County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	5,425	64.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	2,869	33.8%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	183	2.2%
Ira Calkins (I)	2	0.0%
TOTAL	8,479
Turnout: 38%

1990 Senate class 2, Yoakum
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	1,172	71.4%
Hugh Parmer (D)	436	26.6%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	34	2.1%
TOTAL	1,642
Turnout: 28%

1990 Senate class 2, Young
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	3,862	65.9%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,918	32.7%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	76	1.3%
Ira Calkins (I)	4	0.1%
TOTAL	5,860
Turnout: 44%

1990 Senate class 2, Zapata
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	767	46.0%
Hugh Parmer (D)	889	53.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	12	0.7%
TOTAL	1,668
Turnout: 28%

1990 Senate class 2, Zavala
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Phil Gramm* (R)	531	22.8%
Hugh Parmer (D)	1,777	76.3%
Gary Johnson (Lbt)	20	0.9%
TOTAL	2,328
Turnout: 30%