2004-11-02 Senatorial Election Results for North Carolina (Class 3)

Click on a county in the table or the map to see demographic data for that county.

County	Turnout	Richard Burr (R)		Erskine Bowles (D)		Tom Bailey (Libertarian)		Other		Margin	TOTAL
Alamance	51%	30,614	56.8%	22,580	41.9%	714	1.3%	4	0.0%	8,034	53,912
Alexander	59%	10,073	64.1%	5,430	34.5%	222	1.4%	0	0.0%	4,643	15,725
Alleghany	54%	2,754	58.3%	1,908	40.4%	64	1.4%	1	0.0%	846	4,727
Anson	47%	3,367	36.6%	5,734	62.4%	91	1.0%	1	0.0%	-2,367	9,193
Ashe	58%	7,021	59.3%	4,651	39.3%	174	1.5%	0	0.0%	2,370	11,846
Avery	51%	5,157	71.3%	1,917	26.5%	161	2.2%	1	0.0%	3,240	7,236
Beaufort	55%	11,109	56.5%	8,231	41.9%	303	1.5%	3	0.0%	2,878	19,646
Bertie	51%	2,640	33.3%	5,227	66.0%	54	0.7%	0	0.0%	-2,587	7,921
Bladen	47%	5,073	42.7%	6,661	56.1%	143	1.2%	0	0.0%	-1,588	11,877
Brunswick	54%	20,554	55.1%	16,128	43.2%	623	1.7%	0	0.0%	4,426	37,305
Buncombe	58%	46,763	46.5%	51,745	51.4%	2,112	2.1%	11	0.0%	-4,982	100,631
Burke	47%	18,371	57.3%	13,137	40.9%	577	1.8%	0	0.0%	5,234	32,085
Cabarrus	55%	37,494	61.7%	22,206	36.5%	1,068	1.8%	0	0.0%	15,288	60,768
Caldwell	51%	19,612	62.7%	11,079	35.4%	566	1.8%	11	0.0%	8,533	31,268
Camden	61%	2,083	56.0%	1,576	42.4%	62	1.7%	0	0.0%	507	3,721
Carteret	51%	16,082	63.3%	8,875	34.9%	443	1.7%	8	0.0%	7,207	25,408
Caswell	51%	4,559	48.5%	4,737	50.4%	104	1.1%	0	0.0%	-178	9,400
Catawba	51%	35,946	63.1%	20,153	35.4%	841	1.5%	0	0.0%	15,793	56,940
Chatham	60%	11,816	45.9%	13,601	52.8%	333	1.3%	1	0.0%	-1,785	25,751
Cherokee	52%	6,426	60.9%	3,966	37.6%	155	1.5%	1	0.0%	2,460	10,548
Chowan	46%	2,457	47.4%	2,638	50.9%	90	1.7%	0	0.0%	-181	5,185
Clay	61%	2,896	61.1%	1,749	36.9%	98	2.1%	0	0.0%	1,147	4,743
Cleveland	51%	20,324	54.6%	16,342	43.9%	532	1.4%	2	0.0%	3,982	37,200
Columbus	49%	8,721	41.8%	11,860	56.8%	281	1.3%	1	0.0%	-3,139	20,863
Craven	51%	21,402	57.4%	15,299	41.0%	581	1.6%	8	0.0%	6,103	37,290
Cumberland	43%	44,145	46.2%	50,097	52.4%	1,331	1.4%	0	0.0%	-5,952	95,573
Currituck	55%	5,007	59.7%	3,172	37.8%	212	2.5%	0	0.0%	1,835	8,391
Dare	62%	8,215	52.7%	6,995	44.8%	327	2.1%	64	0.4%	1,220	15,601
Davidson	51%	38,913	65.5%	19,530	32.9%	952	1.6%	0	0.0%	19,383	59,395
Davie	58%	11,861	71.4%	4,505	27.1%	223	1.3%	15	0.1%	7,356	16,604
Duplin	42%	8,613	52.0%	7,768	46.9%	181	1.1%	11	0.1%	845	16,573
Durham	59%	32,217	29.4%	76,294	69.5%	1,205	1.1%	2	0.0%	-44,077	109,718
Edgecombe	51%	7,072	33.5%	13,822	65.5%	195	0.9%	0	0.0%	-6,750	21,089
Forsyth	57%	74,108	53.1%	63,899	45.8%	1,431	1.0%	29	0.0%	10,209	139,467
Franklin	53%	10,421	49.8%	10,197	48.8%	295	1.4%	1	0.0%	224	20,914
Gaston	43%	39,857	62.6%	22,750	35.7%	1,092	1.7%	1	0.0%	17,107	63,700
Gates	49%	1,654	40.7%	2,352	57.9%	53	1.3%	0	0.0%	-698	4,059
Graham	58%	2,267	60.1%	1,445	38.3%	62	1.6%	0	0.0%	822	3,774
Granville	45%	8,447	45.7%	9,806	53.1%	214	1.2%	1	0.0%	-1,359	18,468
Greene	43%	3,400	52.4%	3,043	46.9%	49	0.8%	0	0.0%	357	6,492
Guilford	58%	89,926	45.3%	106,315	53.5%	2,371	1.2%	2	0.0%	-16,389	198,614
Halifax	47%	7,110	36.0%	12,457	63.1%	162	0.8%	2	0.0%	-5,347	19,731
Harnett	44%	18,501	57.2%	13,417	41.5%	435	1.3%	12	0.0%	5,084	32,365
Haywood	58%	12,949	49.5%	12,710	48.6%	477	1.8%	5	0.0%	239	26,141
Henderson	55%	25,430	61.1%	15,652	37.6%	552	1.3%	0	0.0%	9,778	41,634
Hertford	45%	2,478	31.0%	5,428	68.0%	76	1.0%	4	0.1%	-2,950	7,986
Hoke	40%	4,431	40.6%	6,271	57.5%	199	1.8%	0	0.0%	-1,840	10,901
Hyde	47%	1,060	48.1%	1,118	50.7%	28	1.3%	0	0.0%	-58	2,206
Iredell	56%	35,600	62.5%	20,402	35.8%	923	1.6%	10	0.0%	15,198	56,935
Jackson	48%	6,656	47.2%	7,220	51.2%	228	1.6%	0	0.0%	-564	14,104
Johnston	52%	33,334	61.9%	19,966	37.1%	563	1.0%	13	0.0%	13,368	53,876
Jones	58%	2,392	52.7%	2,092	46.1%	52	1.1%	0	0.0%	300	4,536
Lee	50%	10,218	52.7%	8,900	45.9%	252	1.3%	1	0.0%	1,318	19,371
Lenoir	51%	11,707	51.2%	11,012	48.2%	141	0.6%	4	0.0%	695	22,864
Lincoln	56%	18,422	62.2%	10,657	36.0%	556	1.9%	0	0.0%	7,765	29,635
Macon	57%	8,399	58.1%	5,896	40.8%	159	1.1%	0	0.0%	2,503	14,454
Madison	57%	4,490	49.2%	4,479	49.1%	149	1.6%	0	0.0%	11	9,118
Martin	55%	4,615	44.0%	5,779	55.1%	97	0.9%	1	0.0%	-1,164	10,492
McDowell	47%	9,366	59.2%	6,179	39.1%	267	1.7%	3	0.0%	3,187	15,815
Mecklenburg	54%	141,653	44.3%	173,964	54.4%	4,105	1.3%	0	0.0%	-32,311	319,722
Mitchell	62%	5,340	69.4%	2,208	28.7%	139	1.8%	2	0.0%	3,132	7,689
Montgomery	49%	5,234	52.0%	4,693	46.6%	143	1.4%	2	0.0%	541	10,072
Moore	60%	22,522	59.9%	14,708	39.1%	360	1.0%	0	0.0%	7,814	37,590
Nash	56%	19,985	52.7%	17,611	46.4%	331	0.9%	1	0.0%	2,374	37,928
New Hanover	56%	41,231	52.1%	36,218	45.8%	1,635	2.1%	4	0.0%	5,013	79,088
Northampton	51%	2,822	32.2%	5,861	66.9%	71	0.8%	2	0.0%	-3,039	8,756
Onslow	30%	22,790	63.2%	12,542	34.8%	748	2.1%	8	0.0%	10,248	36,088
Orange	65%	19,797	30.9%	43,476	67.8%	843	1.3%	3	0.0%	-23,679	64,119
Pamlico	58%	3,326	55.3%	2,605	43.3%	83	1.4%	0	0.0%	721	6,014
Pasquotank	47%	5,669	42.7%	7,426	55.9%	184	1.4%	0	0.0%	-1,757	13,279
Pender	48%	9,182	54.6%	7,390	43.9%	252	1.5%	0	0.0%	1,792	16,824
Perquimans	51%	2,566	52.7%	2,242	46.0%	64	1.3%	0	0.0%	324	4,872
Person	53%	8,212	54.4%	6,701	44.4%	185	1.2%	0	0.0%	1,511	15,098
Pitt	47%	26,489	50.1%	26,019	49.2%	398	0.8%	2	0.0%	470	52,908
Polk	59%	4,825	52.7%	4,169	45.5%	159	1.7%	0	0.0%	656	9,153
Randolph	51%	35,495	68.9%	15,199	29.5%	792	1.5%	0	0.0%	20,296	51,486
Richmond	46%	6,574	40.8%	9,221	57.2%	274	1.7%	60	0.4%	-2,647	16,129
Robeson	37%	13,025	37.9%	20,896	60.7%	482	1.4%	7	0.0%	-7,871	34,410
Rockingham	52%	21,224	57.1%	15,435	41.5%	518	1.4%	5	0.0%	5,789	37,182
Rowan	51%	31,998	62.1%	18,543	36.0%	1,011	2.0%	0	0.0%	13,455	51,552
Rutherford	48%	14,061	58.4%	9,669	40.1%	358	1.5%	0	0.0%	4,392	24,088
Sampson	49%	11,574	51.7%	10,626	47.5%	165	0.7%	4	0.0%	948	22,369
Scotland	41%	4,336	40.4%	6,282	58.5%	113	1.1%	0	0.0%	-1,946	10,731
Stanly	56%	16,036	64.1%	8,603	34.4%	376	1.5%	0	0.0%	7,433	25,015
Stokes	57%	13,456	67.8%	6,138	30.9%	258	1.3%	6	0.0%	7,318	19,858
Surry	47%	16,740	65.0%	8,735	33.9%	275	1.1%	4	0.0%	8,005	25,754
Swain	49%	2,344	46.8%	2,587	51.6%	79	1.6%	1	0.0%	-243	5,011
Transylvania	61%	8,586	56.2%	6,421	42.0%	277	1.8%	0	0.0%	2,165	15,284
Tyrrell	46%	658	42.8%	857	55.7%	24	1.6%	0	0.0%	-199	1,539
Union	54%	39,383	66.1%	19,451	32.7%	703	1.2%	0	0.0%	19,932	59,537
Vance	49%	6,137	38.6%	9,633	60.6%	114	0.7%	1	0.0%	-3,496	15,885
Wake	63%	163,069	47.3%	177,324	51.4%	4,281	1.2%	0	0.0%	-14,255	344,674
Warren	51%	2,510	31.3%	5,424	67.6%	82	1.0%	9	0.1%	-2,914	8,025
Washington	54%	2,126	38.9%	3,285	60.1%	56	1.0%	2	0.0%	-1,159	5,469
Watauga	61%	12,207	51.3%	10,987	46.2%	579	2.4%	1	0.0%	1,220	23,774
Wayne	46%	23,026	56.9%	17,116	42.3%	318	0.8%	1	0.0%	5,910	40,461
Wilkes	53%	18,173	65.9%	8,967	32.5%	435	1.6%	1	0.0%	9,206	27,576
Wilson	53%	14,416	47.7%	15,566	51.5%	223	0.7%	0	0.0%	-1,150	30,205
Yadkin	55%	11,464	73.3%	3,956	25.3%	215	1.4%	0	0.0%	7,508	15,635
Yancey	67%	4,594	48.6%	4,718	49.9%	134	1.4%	2	0.0%	-124	9,448
TOTAL	53%	1,791,450	51.6%	1,632,527	47.0%	47,743	1.4%	362	0.0%	158,923	3,472,082
Total R vote: 1,791,450 (51.6%)      Total D vote: 1,632,527 (47.0%)      Total Other vote: 48,105 (1.4%)
* incumbent
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Total Disbursements:		$12,856,982		$13,359,764		$0
Total Receipts:		$12,955,098		$13,407,656		$0
Cash on Hand:		$98,114		$76,803		$0
Contributions by Candidate:		$0		$0		$0
Loans by Candidate:		$0		$3,757,012		$0
Total Individual Contributions:		$6,739,184		$8,505,462		$0
Party Contributions:		$58,058		$34,000		$0
Other Committee Contributions:		$2,796,484		$825,187		$0
Transfers from Other Committees:		$2,759,705		$184,445		$0
Independent Expenditures Supporting:		$971,019		$2,584,920		$0
Independent Expenditures Opposing:		$11,535		$2,345,018		$0
Net Independent Expenditures:		$959,484		$239,902		$0
Net Spending:		$13,816,466		$13,599,666		$0

2004 Senate class 3, Alamance County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	30,614	56.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	22,580	41.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	714	1.3%
TOTAL	53,912
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Alexander County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	10,073	64.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,430	34.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	222	1.4%
TOTAL	15,725
Turnout: 59%

2004 Senate class 3, Alleghany County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,754	58.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,908	40.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	64	1.4%
TOTAL	4,727
Turnout: 54%

2004 Senate class 3, Anson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	3,367	36.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,734	62.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	91	1.0%
TOTAL	9,193
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Ashe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	7,021	59.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,651	39.3%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	174	1.5%
TOTAL	11,846
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Avery County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	5,157	71.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,917	26.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	161	2.2%
TOTAL	7,236
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Beaufort County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	11,109	56.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,231	41.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	303	1.5%
TOTAL	19,646
Turnout: 55%

2004 Senate class 3, Bertie County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,640	33.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,227	66.0%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	54	0.7%
TOTAL	7,921
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Bladen County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	5,073	42.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,661	56.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	143	1.2%
TOTAL	11,877
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Brunswick County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	20,554	55.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	16,128	43.2%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	623	1.7%
TOTAL	37,305
Turnout: 54%

2004 Senate class 3, Buncombe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	46,763	46.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	51,745	51.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	2,112	2.1%
TOTAL	100,631
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Burke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	18,371	57.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	13,137	40.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	577	1.8%
TOTAL	32,085
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Cabarrus County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	37,494	61.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	22,206	36.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	1,068	1.8%
TOTAL	60,768
Turnout: 55%

2004 Senate class 3, Caldwell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	19,612	62.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,079	35.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	566	1.8%
TOTAL	31,268
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Camden County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,083	56.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,576	42.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	62	1.7%
TOTAL	3,721
Turnout: 61%

2004 Senate class 3, Carteret County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	16,082	63.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,875	34.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	443	1.7%
TOTAL	25,408
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Caswell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	4,559	48.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,737	50.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	104	1.1%
TOTAL	9,400
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Catawba County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	35,946	63.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	20,153	35.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	841	1.5%
TOTAL	56,940
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Chatham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	11,816	45.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	13,601	52.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	333	1.3%
TOTAL	25,751
Turnout: 60%

2004 Senate class 3, Cherokee County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	6,426	60.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,966	37.6%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	155	1.5%
TOTAL	10,548
Turnout: 52%

2004 Senate class 3, Chowan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,457	47.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,638	50.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	90	1.7%
TOTAL	5,185
Turnout: 46%

2004 Senate class 3, Clay County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,896	61.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,749	36.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	98	2.1%
TOTAL	4,743
Turnout: 61%

2004 Senate class 3, Cleveland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	20,324	54.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	16,342	43.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	532	1.4%
TOTAL	37,200
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Columbus County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	8,721	41.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,860	56.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	281	1.3%
TOTAL	20,863
Turnout: 49%

2004 Senate class 3, Craven County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	21,402	57.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	15,299	41.0%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	581	1.6%
TOTAL	37,290
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Cumberland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	44,145	46.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	50,097	52.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	1,331	1.4%
TOTAL	95,573
Turnout: 43%

2004 Senate class 3, Currituck County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	5,007	59.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,172	37.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	212	2.5%
TOTAL	8,391
Turnout: 55%

2004 Senate class 3, Dare County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	8,215	52.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,995	44.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	327	2.1%
TOTAL	15,601
Turnout: 62%

2004 Senate class 3, Davidson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	38,913	65.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	19,530	32.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	952	1.6%
TOTAL	59,395
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Davie County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	11,861	71.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,505	27.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	223	1.3%
TOTAL	16,604
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Duplin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	8,613	52.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,768	46.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	181	1.1%
TOTAL	16,573
Turnout: 42%

2004 Senate class 3, Durham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	32,217	29.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	76,294	69.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	1,205	1.1%
TOTAL	109,718
Turnout: 59%

2004 Senate class 3, Edgecombe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	7,072	33.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	13,822	65.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	195	0.9%
TOTAL	21,089
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Forsyth County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	74,108	53.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	63,899	45.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	1,431	1.0%
TOTAL	139,467
Turnout: 57%

2004 Senate class 3, Franklin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	10,421	49.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	10,197	48.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	295	1.4%
TOTAL	20,914
Turnout: 53%

2004 Senate class 3, Gaston County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	39,857	62.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	22,750	35.7%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	1,092	1.7%
TOTAL	63,700
Turnout: 43%

2004 Senate class 3, Gates County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	1,654	40.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,352	57.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	53	1.3%
TOTAL	4,059
Turnout: 49%

2004 Senate class 3, Graham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,267	60.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,445	38.3%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	62	1.6%
TOTAL	3,774
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Granville County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	8,447	45.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,806	53.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	214	1.2%
TOTAL	18,468
Turnout: 45%

2004 Senate class 3, Greene County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	3,400	52.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,043	46.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	49	0.8%
TOTAL	6,492
Turnout: 43%

2004 Senate class 3, Guilford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	89,926	45.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	106,315	53.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	2,371	1.2%
TOTAL	198,614
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Halifax County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	7,110	36.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,457	63.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	162	0.8%
TOTAL	19,731
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Harnett County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	18,501	57.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	13,417	41.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	435	1.3%
TOTAL	32,365
Turnout: 44%

2004 Senate class 3, Haywood County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	12,949	49.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,710	48.6%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	477	1.8%
TOTAL	26,141
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Henderson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	25,430	61.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	15,652	37.6%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	552	1.3%
TOTAL	41,634
Turnout: 55%

2004 Senate class 3, Hertford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,478	31.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,428	68.0%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	76	1.0%
TOTAL	7,986
Turnout: 45%

2004 Senate class 3, Hoke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	4,431	40.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,271	57.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	199	1.8%
TOTAL	10,901
Turnout: 40%

2004 Senate class 3, Hyde County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	1,060	48.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	1,118	50.7%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	28	1.3%
TOTAL	2,206
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Iredell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	35,600	62.5%
Erskine Bowles (D)	20,402	35.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	923	1.6%
TOTAL	56,935
Turnout: 56%

2004 Senate class 3, Jackson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	6,656	47.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,220	51.2%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	228	1.6%
TOTAL	14,104
Turnout: 48%

2004 Senate class 3, Johnston County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	33,334	61.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	19,966	37.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	563	1.0%
TOTAL	53,876
Turnout: 52%

2004 Senate class 3, Jones County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,392	52.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,092	46.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	52	1.1%
TOTAL	4,536
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Lee County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	10,218	52.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,900	45.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	252	1.3%
TOTAL	19,371
Turnout: 50%

2004 Senate class 3, Lenoir County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	11,707	51.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	11,012	48.2%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	141	0.6%
TOTAL	22,864
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Lincoln County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	18,422	62.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	10,657	36.0%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	556	1.9%
TOTAL	29,635
Turnout: 56%

2004 Senate class 3, Macon County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	8,399	58.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,896	40.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	159	1.1%
TOTAL	14,454
Turnout: 57%

2004 Senate class 3, Madison County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	4,490	49.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,479	49.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	149	1.6%
TOTAL	9,118
Turnout: 57%

2004 Senate class 3, Martin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	4,615	44.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,779	55.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	97	0.9%
TOTAL	10,492
Turnout: 55%

2004 Senate class 3, McDowell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	9,366	59.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,179	39.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	267	1.7%
TOTAL	15,815
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Mecklenburg County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	141,653	44.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	173,964	54.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	4,105	1.3%
TOTAL	319,722
Turnout: 54%

2004 Senate class 3, Mitchell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	5,340	69.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,208	28.7%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	139	1.8%
TOTAL	7,689
Turnout: 62%

2004 Senate class 3, Montgomery County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	5,234	52.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,693	46.6%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	143	1.4%
TOTAL	10,072
Turnout: 49%

2004 Senate class 3, Moore County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	22,522	59.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	14,708	39.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	360	1.0%
TOTAL	37,590
Turnout: 60%

2004 Senate class 3, Nash County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	19,985	52.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	17,611	46.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	331	0.9%
TOTAL	37,928
Turnout: 56%

2004 Senate class 3, New Hanover County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	41,231	52.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	36,218	45.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	1,635	2.1%
TOTAL	79,088
Turnout: 56%

2004 Senate class 3, Northampton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,822	32.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,861	66.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	71	0.8%
TOTAL	8,756
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Onslow County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	22,790	63.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	12,542	34.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	748	2.1%
TOTAL	36,088
Turnout: 30%

2004 Senate class 3, Orange County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	19,797	30.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	43,476	67.8%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	843	1.3%
TOTAL	64,119
Turnout: 65%

2004 Senate class 3, Pamlico County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	3,326	55.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,605	43.3%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	83	1.4%
TOTAL	6,014
Turnout: 58%

2004 Senate class 3, Pasquotank County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	5,669	42.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,426	55.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	184	1.4%
TOTAL	13,279
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Pender County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	9,182	54.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	7,390	43.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	252	1.5%
TOTAL	16,824
Turnout: 48%

2004 Senate class 3, Perquimans County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,566	52.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,242	46.0%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	64	1.3%
TOTAL	4,872
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Person County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	8,212	54.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,701	44.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	185	1.2%
TOTAL	15,098
Turnout: 53%

2004 Senate class 3, Pitt County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	26,489	50.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	26,019	49.2%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	398	0.8%
TOTAL	52,908
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Polk County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	4,825	52.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,169	45.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	159	1.7%
TOTAL	9,153
Turnout: 59%

2004 Senate class 3, Randolph County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	35,495	68.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	15,199	29.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	792	1.5%
TOTAL	51,486
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Richmond County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	6,574	40.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,221	57.2%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	274	1.7%
TOTAL	16,129
Turnout: 46%

2004 Senate class 3, Robeson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	13,025	37.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	20,896	60.7%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	482	1.4%
TOTAL	34,410
Turnout: 37%

2004 Senate class 3, Rockingham County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	21,224	57.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	15,435	41.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	518	1.4%
TOTAL	37,182
Turnout: 52%

2004 Senate class 3, Rowan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	31,998	62.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	18,543	36.0%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	1,011	2.0%
TOTAL	51,552
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Rutherford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	14,061	58.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,669	40.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	358	1.5%
TOTAL	24,088
Turnout: 48%

2004 Senate class 3, Sampson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	11,574	51.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	10,626	47.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	165	0.7%
TOTAL	22,369
Turnout: 49%

2004 Senate class 3, Scotland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	4,336	40.4%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,282	58.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	113	1.1%
TOTAL	10,731
Turnout: 41%

2004 Senate class 3, Stanly County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	16,036	64.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,603	34.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	376	1.5%
TOTAL	25,015
Turnout: 56%

2004 Senate class 3, Stokes County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	13,456	67.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,138	30.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	258	1.3%
TOTAL	19,858
Turnout: 57%

2004 Senate class 3, Surry County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	16,740	65.0%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,735	33.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	275	1.1%
TOTAL	25,754
Turnout: 47%

2004 Senate class 3, Swain County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,344	46.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	2,587	51.6%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	79	1.6%
TOTAL	5,011
Turnout: 49%

2004 Senate class 3, Transylvania County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	8,586	56.2%
Erskine Bowles (D)	6,421	42.0%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	277	1.8%
TOTAL	15,284
Turnout: 61%

2004 Senate class 3, Tyrrell County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	658	42.8%
Erskine Bowles (D)	857	55.7%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	24	1.6%
TOTAL	1,539
Turnout: 46%

2004 Senate class 3, Union County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	39,383	66.1%
Erskine Bowles (D)	19,451	32.7%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	703	1.2%
TOTAL	59,537
Turnout: 54%

2004 Senate class 3, Vance County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	6,137	38.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	9,633	60.6%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	114	0.7%
TOTAL	15,885
Turnout: 49%

2004 Senate class 3, Wake County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	163,069	47.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	177,324	51.4%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	4,281	1.2%
TOTAL	344,674
Turnout: 63%

2004 Senate class 3, Warren County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,510	31.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	5,424	67.6%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	82	1.0%
TOTAL	8,025
Turnout: 51%

2004 Senate class 3, Washington County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	2,126	38.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,285	60.1%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	56	1.0%
TOTAL	5,469
Turnout: 54%

2004 Senate class 3, Watauga County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	12,207	51.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	10,987	46.2%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	579	2.4%
TOTAL	23,774
Turnout: 61%

2004 Senate class 3, Wayne County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	23,026	56.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	17,116	42.3%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	318	0.8%
TOTAL	40,461
Turnout: 46%

2004 Senate class 3, Wilkes County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	18,173	65.9%
Erskine Bowles (D)	8,967	32.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	435	1.6%
TOTAL	27,576
Turnout: 53%

2004 Senate class 3, Wilson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	14,416	47.7%
Erskine Bowles (D)	15,566	51.5%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	223	0.7%
TOTAL	30,205
Turnout: 53%

2004 Senate class 3, Yadkin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	11,464	73.3%
Erskine Bowles (D)	3,956	25.3%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	215	1.4%
TOTAL	15,635
Turnout: 55%

2004 Senate class 3, Yancey County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Richard Burr (R)	4,594	48.6%
Erskine Bowles (D)	4,718	49.9%
Tom Bailey (Lbt)	134	1.4%
TOTAL	9,448
Turnout: 67%

Campaign finance data for this election**:

Richard Burr
Total Disbursements:	$12,856,982
Total Receipts:	$12,955,098
Cash on Hand:	$98,114
Candidate Contributions:	$0
Candidate Loans:	$0
Individual Contributions:	$6,739,184
Party Contributions:	$58,058
Other Committee Contributions:	$2,796,484
Other Committee Transfers:	$2,759,705
Indep. Expenditures Supporting:	$971,019
Indep. Expenditures Opposing:	$11,535
Net Independent Expenditures:	$959,484
Net Spending:	$13,816,466

Erskine Bowles
Total Disbursements:	$13,359,764
Total Receipts:	$13,407,656
Cash on Hand:	$76,803
Candidate Contributions:	$0
Candidate Loans:	$3,757,012
Individual Contributions:	$8,505,462
Party Contributions:	$34,000
Other Committee Contributions:	$825,187
Other Committee Transfers:	$184,445
Indep. Expenditures Supporting:	$2,584,920
Indep. Expenditures Opposing:	$2,345,018
Net Independent Expenditures:	$239,902
Net Spending:	$13,599,666

**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
Source: https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/senate/NC/2004