County | Turnout | Elizabeth Dole (R) |
Erskine Bowles (D) |
Sean Haugh (Libertarian) |
Other | Margin | TOTAL | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alamance | 34% | 20,580 | 59.2% | 13,587 | 39.1% | 571 | 1.6% | 16 | 0.0% | 6,993 | 34,754 | ||||||||
Alexander | 46% | 7,125 | 59.5% | 4,570 | 38.2% | 250 | 2.1% | 23 | 0.2% | 2,555 | 11,968 | ||||||||
Alleghany | 44% | 1,846 | 48.8% | 1,840 | 48.6% | 91 | 2.4% | 6 | 0.2% | 6 | 3,783 | ||||||||
Anson | 32% | 2,134 | 34.1% | 4,063 | 64.9% | 62 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,929 | 6,259 | ||||||||
Ashe | 45% | 4,886 | 54.0% | 3,977 | 43.9% | 186 | 2.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 909 | 9,049 | ||||||||
Avery | 35% | 3,616 | 73.5% | 1,228 | 24.9% | 77 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.0% | 2,388 | 4,922 | ||||||||
Beaufort | 44% | 9,057 | 58.5% | 6,098 | 39.4% | 317 | 2.0% | 11 | 0.1% | 2,959 | 15,483 | ||||||||
Bertie | 35% | 1,671 | 31.3% | 3,617 | 67.8% | 47 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,946 | 5,335 | ||||||||
Bladen | 35% | 3,474 | 40.0% | 5,144 | 59.2% | 74 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,670 | 8,692 | ||||||||
Brunswick | 41% | 14,002 | 53.8% | 11,537 | 44.3% | 489 | 1.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,465 | 26,028 | ||||||||
Buncombe | 38% | 31,360 | 49.4% | 31,359 | 49.4% | 754 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 63,473 | ||||||||
Burke | 38% | 14,351 | 55.0% | 11,115 | 42.6% | 608 | 2.3% | 27 | 0.1% | 3,236 | 26,101 | ||||||||
Cabarrus | 38% | 25,434 | 63.9% | 13,657 | 34.3% | 683 | 1.7% | 2 | 0.0% | 11,777 | 39,776 | ||||||||
Caldwell | 37% | 13,245 | 59.3% | 8,511 | 38.1% | 544 | 2.4% | 24 | 0.1% | 4,734 | 22,324 | ||||||||
Camden | 47% | 1,292 | 48.6% | 1,325 | 49.9% | 39 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | -33 | 2,656 | ||||||||
Carteret | 41% | 12,408 | 61.9% | 7,216 | 36.0% | 408 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 5,192 | 20,032 | ||||||||
Caswell | 37% | 3,049 | 45.2% | 3,615 | 53.6% | 84 | 1.2% | 2 | 0.0% | -566 | 6,750 | ||||||||
Catawba | 36% | 25,318 | 64.1% | 13,436 | 34.0% | 772 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 11,882 | 39,526 | ||||||||
Chatham | 47% | 8,897 | 46.8% | 9,809 | 51.6% | 289 | 1.5% | 3 | 0.0% | -912 | 18,998 | ||||||||
Cherokee | 42% | 4,878 | 58.5% | 3,355 | 40.2% | 108 | 1.3% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,523 | 8,342 | ||||||||
Chowan | 33% | 1,744 | 47.2% | 1,894 | 51.2% | 60 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | -150 | 3,698 | ||||||||
Clay | 48% | 2,209 | 61.3% | 1,342 | 37.2% | 54 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 867 | 3,605 | ||||||||
Cleveland | 35% | 13,984 | 54.4% | 11,330 | 44.1% | 392 | 1.5% | 8 | 0.0% | 2,654 | 25,714 | ||||||||
Columbus | 37% | 5,925 | 39.1% | 9,015 | 59.6% | 195 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -3,090 | 15,135 | ||||||||
Craven | 36% | 15,162 | 58.7% | 10,240 | 39.6% | 434 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 4,922 | 25,836 | ||||||||
Cumberland | 26% | 27,941 | 48.1% | 29,417 | 50.6% | 758 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,476 | 58,116 | ||||||||
Currituck | 40% | 3,309 | 57.8% | 2,337 | 40.8% | 82 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 972 | 5,728 | ||||||||
Dare | 42% | 5,695 | 55.5% | 4,418 | 43.1% | 143 | 1.4% | 4 | 0.0% | 1,277 | 10,260 | ||||||||
Davidson | 39% | 27,277 | 61.5% | 15,992 | 36.1% | 1,042 | 2.4% | 7 | 0.0% | 11,285 | 44,318 | ||||||||
Davie | 40% | 7,659 | 70.5% | 3,008 | 27.7% | 175 | 1.6% | 23 | 0.2% | 4,651 | 10,865 | ||||||||
Duplin | 31% | 5,476 | 47.3% | 5,912 | 51.0% | 181 | 1.6% | 12 | 0.1% | -436 | 11,581 | ||||||||
Durham | 37% | 23,841 | 35.6% | 42,350 | 63.3% | 739 | 1.1% | 13 | 0.0% | -18,509 | 66,943 | ||||||||
Edgecombe | 34% | 4,766 | 33.9% | 9,160 | 65.1% | 142 | 1.0% | 2 | 0.0% | -4,394 | 14,070 | ||||||||
Forsyth | 40% | 50,867 | 53.6% | 42,696 | 45.0% | 1,277 | 1.3% | 12 | 0.0% | 8,171 | 94,852 | ||||||||
Franklin | 39% | 7,170 | 49.8% | 6,950 | 48.2% | 289 | 2.0% | 3 | 0.0% | 220 | 14,412 | ||||||||
Gaston | 29% | 27,176 | 63.4% | 14,976 | 34.9% | 703 | 1.6% | 1 | 0.0% | 12,200 | 42,856 | ||||||||
Gates | 27% | 764 | 34.7% | 1,425 | 64.8% | 10 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | -661 | 2,199 | ||||||||
Graham | 65% | 2,220 | 53.3% | 1,906 | 45.8% | 40 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 314 | 4,166 | ||||||||
Granville | 30% | 5,511 | 46.8% | 6,146 | 52.1% | 131 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -635 | 11,788 | ||||||||
Greene | 31% | 2,274 | 49.8% | 2,252 | 49.3% | 42 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 22 | 4,568 | ||||||||
Guilford | 39% | 64,997 | 49.8% | 64,050 | 49.0% | 1,541 | 1.2% | 7 | 0.0% | 947 | 130,595 | ||||||||
Halifax | 34% | 5,432 | 38.0% | 8,714 | 60.9% | 151 | 1.1% | 1 | 0.0% | -3,282 | 14,298 | ||||||||
Harnett | 30% | 12,174 | 58.6% | 8,263 | 39.8% | 322 | 1.5% | 21 | 0.1% | 3,911 | 20,780 | ||||||||
Haywood | 41% | 8,438 | 47.3% | 9,155 | 51.3% | 258 | 1.4% | 5 | 0.0% | -717 | 17,856 | ||||||||
Henderson | 41% | 19,283 | 64.0% | 10,575 | 35.1% | 251 | 0.8% | 2 | 0.0% | 8,708 | 30,111 | ||||||||
Hertford | 31% | 1,499 | 27.8% | 3,854 | 71.6% | 28 | 0.5% | 5 | 0.1% | -2,355 | 5,386 | ||||||||
Hoke | 25% | 2,513 | 40.1% | 3,665 | 58.4% | 91 | 1.5% | 3 | 0.0% | -1,152 | 6,272 | ||||||||
Hyde | 40% | 853 | 45.3% | 1,008 | 53.5% | 23 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | -155 | 1,884 | ||||||||
Iredell | 35% | 21,646 | 63.6% | 11,852 | 34.8% | 550 | 1.6% | 5 | 0.0% | 9,794 | 34,053 | ||||||||
Jackson | 33% | 4,161 | 44.9% | 4,988 | 53.8% | 118 | 1.3% | 3 | 0.0% | -827 | 9,270 | ||||||||
Johnston | 37% | 22,719 | 63.2% | 12,722 | 35.4% | 484 | 1.3% | 2 | 0.0% | 9,997 | 35,927 | ||||||||
Jones | 54% | 2,065 | 49.2% | 2,067 | 49.2% | 69 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | -2 | 4,201 | ||||||||
Lee | 35% | 7,375 | 55.2% | 5,820 | 43.5% | 167 | 1.2% | 8 | 0.1% | 1,555 | 13,370 | ||||||||
Lenoir | 40% | 8,888 | 50.3% | 8,624 | 48.8% | 152 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 264 | 17,664 | ||||||||
Lincoln | 41% | 12,309 | 60.2% | 7,649 | 37.4% | 470 | 2.3% | 4 | 0.0% | 4,660 | 20,432 | ||||||||
Macon | 47% | 6,383 | 55.0% | 4,932 | 42.5% | 298 | 2.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,451 | 11,613 | ||||||||
Madison | 47% | 3,300 | 44.7% | 3,994 | 54.1% | 91 | 1.2% | 1 | 0.0% | -694 | 7,386 | ||||||||
Martin | 42% | 3,334 | 41.3% | 4,630 | 57.3% | 113 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.0% | -1,296 | 8,078 | ||||||||
McDowell | 34% | 6,202 | 54.9% | 4,901 | 43.4% | 156 | 1.4% | 31 | 0.3% | 1,301 | 11,290 | ||||||||
Mecklenburg | 36% | 100,762 | 50.0% | 98,332 | 48.8% | 2,448 | 1.2% | 29 | 0.0% | 2,430 | 201,571 | ||||||||
Mitchell | 44% | 3,801 | 69.5% | 1,590 | 29.1% | 82 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,211 | 5,473 | ||||||||
Montgomery | 35% | 3,502 | 49.3% | 3,474 | 48.9% | 129 | 1.8% | 2 | 0.0% | 28 | 7,107 | ||||||||
Moore | 43% | 16,753 | 64.4% | 8,951 | 34.4% | 317 | 1.2% | 2 | 0.0% | 7,802 | 26,023 | ||||||||
Nash | 39% | 14,564 | 56.3% | 11,032 | 42.7% | 251 | 1.0% | 1 | 0.0% | 3,532 | 25,848 | ||||||||
New Hanover | 40% | 29,478 | 55.6% | 22,641 | 42.7% | 869 | 1.6% | 3 | 0.0% | 6,837 | 52,991 | ||||||||
Northampton | 39% | 2,006 | 30.2% | 4,564 | 68.8% | 67 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | -2,558 | 6,637 | ||||||||
Onslow | 20% | 14,256 | 60.6% | 8,687 | 36.9% | 550 | 2.3% | 30 | 0.1% | 5,569 | 23,523 | ||||||||
Orange | 41% | 13,629 | 34.5% | 25,401 | 64.3% | 474 | 1.2% | 22 | 0.1% | -11,772 | 39,526 | ||||||||
Pamlico | 48% | 2,734 | 55.4% | 2,112 | 42.8% | 90 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 622 | 4,936 | ||||||||
Pasquotank | 25% | 2,984 | 42.9% | 3,921 | 56.4% | 48 | 0.7% | 0 | 0.0% | -937 | 6,953 | ||||||||
Pender | 37% | 6,364 | 51.2% | 5,876 | 47.3% | 182 | 1.5% | 2 | 0.0% | 488 | 12,424 | ||||||||
Perquimans | 38% | 1,688 | 49.2% | 1,710 | 49.8% | 34 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | -22 | 3,432 | ||||||||
Person | 38% | 5,873 | 56.1% | 4,444 | 42.4% | 159 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,429 | 10,476 | ||||||||
Pitt | 32% | 18,514 | 54.1% | 15,446 | 45.1% | 270 | 0.8% | 4 | 0.0% | 3,068 | 34,234 | ||||||||
Polk | 45% | 3,939 | 58.4% | 2,713 | 40.2% | 98 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,226 | 6,750 | ||||||||
Randolph | 32% | 22,134 | 69.0% | 9,366 | 29.2% | 564 | 1.8% | 1 | 0.0% | 12,768 | 32,065 | ||||||||
Richmond | 32% | 4,167 | 38.0% | 6,600 | 60.2% | 190 | 1.7% | 4 | 0.0% | -2,433 | 10,961 | ||||||||
Robeson | 23% | 7,410 | 35.9% | 12,864 | 62.3% | 185 | 0.9% | 199 | 1.0% | -5,454 | 20,658 | ||||||||
Rockingham | 37% | 13,899 | 52.3% | 12,062 | 45.4% | 626 | 2.4% | 2 | 0.0% | 1,837 | 26,589 | ||||||||
Rowan | 36% | 22,688 | 63.8% | 12,153 | 34.2% | 733 | 2.1% | 5 | 0.0% | 10,535 | 35,579 | ||||||||
Rutherford | 36% | 10,012 | 57.7% | 7,101 | 40.9% | 242 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 2,911 | 17,355 | ||||||||
Sampson | 36% | 8,367 | 51.7% | 7,645 | 47.2% | 171 | 1.1% | 12 | 0.1% | 722 | 16,195 | ||||||||
Scotland | 29% | 3,072 | 40.5% | 4,442 | 58.5% | 74 | 1.0% | 1 | 0.0% | -1,370 | 7,589 | ||||||||
Stanly | 42% | 11,680 | 62.5% | 6,643 | 35.5% | 366 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 5,037 | 18,689 | ||||||||
Stokes | 40% | 8,567 | 62.1% | 4,888 | 35.4% | 335 | 2.4% | 9 | 0.1% | 3,679 | 13,799 | ||||||||
Surry | 33% | 10,723 | 58.8% | 7,161 | 39.2% | 362 | 2.0% | 1 | 0.0% | 3,562 | 18,247 | ||||||||
Swain | 36% | 1,636 | 45.2% | 1,940 | 53.7% | 40 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -304 | 3,616 | ||||||||
Transylvania | 47% | 6,416 | 56.1% | 4,862 | 42.5% | 156 | 1.4% | 1 | 0.0% | 1,554 | 11,435 | ||||||||
Tyrrell | 36% | 478 | 40.0% | 701 | 58.6% | 17 | 1.4% | 0 | 0.0% | -223 | 1,196 | ||||||||
Union | 37% | 24,032 | 65.6% | 12,059 | 32.9% | 545 | 1.5% | 5 | 0.0% | 11,973 | 36,641 | ||||||||
Vance | 31% | 4,126 | 42.2% | 5,584 | 57.1% | 73 | 0.7% | 2 | 0.0% | -1,458 | 9,785 | ||||||||
Wake | 44% | 122,445 | 54.3% | 100,371 | 44.5% | 2,780 | 1.2% | 27 | 0.0% | 22,074 | 225,623 | ||||||||
Warren | 37% | 1,900 | 32.9% | 3,833 | 66.5% | 33 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.0% | -1,933 | 5,768 | ||||||||
Washington | 42% | 1,658 | 38.9% | 2,548 | 59.9% | 51 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | -890 | 4,257 | ||||||||
Watauga | 42% | 8,832 | 56.2% | 6,561 | 41.7% | 320 | 2.0% | 16 | 0.1% | 2,271 | 15,729 | ||||||||
Wayne | 32% | 16,372 | 60.1% | 10,637 | 39.0% | 223 | 0.8% | 23 | 0.1% | 5,735 | 27,255 | ||||||||
Wilkes | 39% | 12,238 | 61.5% | 7,208 | 36.2% | 448 | 2.3% | 6 | 0.0% | 5,030 | 19,900 | ||||||||
Wilson | 34% | 9,756 | 51.0% | 9,230 | 48.2% | 151 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 526 | 19,137 | ||||||||
Yadkin | 41% | 8,128 | 70.3% | 3,139 | 27.1% | 292 | 2.5% | 7 | 0.1% | 4,989 | 11,566 | ||||||||
Yancey | 58% | 3,917 | 47.7% | 4,203 | 51.2% | 87 | 1.1% | 9 | 0.1% | -286 | 8,216 | ||||||||
TOTAL | 37% | 1,248,664 | 53.6% | 1,047,983 | 45.0% | 33,807 | 1.5% | 727 | 0.0% | 200,681 | 2,331,181 | ||||||||
Total R vote: 1,248,664 (53.6%) Total D vote: 1,047,983 (45.0%) Total Other vote: 34,534 (1.5%) | |||||||||||||||||||
* incumbent | |||||||||||||||||||
Campaign finance data for this election**: | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Disbursements: | $13,735,220 | $13,306,317 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Receipts: | $13,840,946 | $13,335,229 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash on Hand: | $105,727 | $28,913 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Contributions by Candidate: | $30,736 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans by Candidate: | $0 | $6,850,000 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Individual Contributions: | $11,149,786 | $5,235,680 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Party Contributions: | $28,166 | $18,850 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Committee Contributions: | $1,469,611 | $523,128 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Transfers from Other Committees: | $1,124,663 | $658,655 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Supporting: | $126,472 | $90,913 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Independent Expenditures Opposing: | $2 | $0 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Independent Expenditures: | $126,470 | $90,913 | $0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Spending: | $13,861,690 | $13,397,230 | $0 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
|
2002 Senate class 2, Alamance County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 20,580 | 59.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 13,587 | 39.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 571 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 34,754 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Alexander County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 7,125 | 59.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,570 | 38.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 250 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 11,968 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Alleghany County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,846 | 48.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,840 | 48.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 91 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 3,783 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Anson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,134 | 34.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,063 | 64.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 62 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 6,259 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Ashe County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 4,886 | 54.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,977 | 43.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 186 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 9,049 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Avery County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,616 | 73.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,228 | 24.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 77 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 4,922 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Beaufort County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 9,057 | 58.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,098 | 39.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 317 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 15,483 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Bertie County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,671 | 31.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,617 | 67.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 47 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 5,335 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Bladen County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,474 | 40.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,144 | 59.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 74 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 8,692 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Brunswick County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 14,002 | 53.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,537 | 44.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 489 | 1.9% |
TOTAL | 26,028 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Buncombe County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 31,360 | 49.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 31,359 | 49.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 754 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 63,473 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Burke County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 14,351 | 55.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,115 | 42.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 608 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 26,101 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Cabarrus County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 25,434 | 63.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 13,657 | 34.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 683 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 39,776 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Caldwell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 13,245 | 59.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,511 | 38.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 544 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 22,324 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Camden County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,292 | 48.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,325 | 49.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 39 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 2,656 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Carteret County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 12,408 | 61.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,216 | 36.0% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 408 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 20,032 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Caswell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,049 | 45.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,615 | 53.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 84 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 6,750 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Catawba County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 25,318 | 64.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 13,436 | 34.0% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 772 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 39,526 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Chatham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 8,897 | 46.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,809 | 51.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 289 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 18,998 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Cherokee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 4,878 | 58.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,355 | 40.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 108 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 8,342 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Chowan County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,744 | 47.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,894 | 51.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 60 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 3,698 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Clay County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,209 | 61.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,342 | 37.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 54 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 3,605 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Cleveland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 13,984 | 54.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,330 | 44.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 392 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 25,714 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Columbus County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 5,925 | 39.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,015 | 59.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 195 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 15,135 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Craven County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 15,162 | 58.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 10,240 | 39.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 434 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 25,836 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Cumberland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 27,941 | 48.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 29,417 | 50.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 758 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 58,116 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Currituck County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,309 | 57.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,337 | 40.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 82 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 5,728 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Dare County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 5,695 | 55.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,418 | 43.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 143 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 10,260 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Davidson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 27,277 | 61.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 15,992 | 36.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 1,042 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 44,318 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Davie County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 7,659 | 70.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,008 | 27.7% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 175 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 10,865 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Duplin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 5,476 | 47.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,912 | 51.0% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 181 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 11,581 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Durham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 23,841 | 35.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 42,350 | 63.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 739 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 66,943 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Edgecombe County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 4,766 | 33.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,160 | 65.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 142 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 14,070 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Forsyth County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 50,867 | 53.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 42,696 | 45.0% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 1,277 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 94,852 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Franklin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 7,170 | 49.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,950 | 48.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 289 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 14,412 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Gaston County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 27,176 | 63.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 14,976 | 34.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 703 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 42,856 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Gates County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 764 | 34.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,425 | 64.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 10 | 0.5% |
TOTAL | 2,199 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Graham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,220 | 53.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,906 | 45.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 40 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 4,166 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Granville County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 5,511 | 46.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,146 | 52.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 131 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 11,788 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Greene County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,274 | 49.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,252 | 49.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 42 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 4,568 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Guilford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 64,997 | 49.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 64,050 | 49.0% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 1,541 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 130,595 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Halifax County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 5,432 | 38.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,714 | 60.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 151 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 14,298 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Harnett County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 12,174 | 58.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,263 | 39.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 322 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 20,780 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Haywood County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 8,438 | 47.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,155 | 51.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 258 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 17,856 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Henderson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 19,283 | 64.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 10,575 | 35.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 251 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 30,111 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Hertford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,499 | 27.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,854 | 71.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 28 | 0.5% |
TOTAL | 5,386 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Hoke County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,513 | 40.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,665 | 58.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 91 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 6,272 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Hyde County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 853 | 45.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,008 | 53.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 23 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 1,884 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Iredell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 21,646 | 63.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,852 | 34.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 550 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 34,053 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Jackson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 4,161 | 44.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,988 | 53.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 118 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 9,270 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Johnston County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 22,719 | 63.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,722 | 35.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 484 | 1.3% |
TOTAL | 35,927 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Jones County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,065 | 49.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,067 | 49.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 69 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 4,201 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Lee County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 7,375 | 55.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,820 | 43.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 167 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 13,370 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Lenoir County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 8,888 | 50.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,624 | 48.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 152 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 17,664 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Lincoln County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 12,309 | 60.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,649 | 37.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 470 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 20,432 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Macon County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 6,383 | 55.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,932 | 42.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 298 | 2.6% |
TOTAL | 11,613 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Madison County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,300 | 44.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,994 | 54.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 91 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 7,386 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Martin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,334 | 41.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,630 | 57.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 113 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 8,078 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, McDowell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 6,202 | 54.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,901 | 43.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 156 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 11,290 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Mecklenburg County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 100,762 | 50.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 98,332 | 48.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 2,448 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 201,571 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Mitchell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,801 | 69.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,590 | 29.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 82 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 5,473 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Montgomery County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,502 | 49.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,474 | 48.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 129 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 7,107 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Moore County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 16,753 | 64.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,951 | 34.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 317 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 26,023 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Nash County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 14,564 | 56.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 11,032 | 42.7% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 251 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 25,848 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, New Hanover County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 29,478 | 55.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 22,641 | 42.7% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 869 | 1.6% |
TOTAL | 52,991 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Northampton County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,006 | 30.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,564 | 68.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 67 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 6,637 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Onslow County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 14,256 | 60.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 8,687 | 36.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 550 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 23,523 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Orange County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 13,629 | 34.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 25,401 | 64.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 474 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 39,526 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Pamlico County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,734 | 55.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,112 | 42.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 90 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 4,936 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Pasquotank County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 2,984 | 42.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,921 | 56.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 48 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 6,953 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Pender County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 6,364 | 51.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,876 | 47.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 182 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 12,424 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Perquimans County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,688 | 49.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,710 | 49.8% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 34 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 3,432 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Person County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 5,873 | 56.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,444 | 42.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 159 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 10,476 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Pitt County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 18,514 | 54.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 15,446 | 45.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 270 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 34,234 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Polk County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,939 | 58.4% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,713 | 40.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 98 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 6,750 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Randolph County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 22,134 | 69.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,366 | 29.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 564 | 1.8% |
TOTAL | 32,065 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Richmond County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 4,167 | 38.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,600 | 60.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 190 | 1.7% |
TOTAL | 10,961 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Robeson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 7,410 | 35.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,864 | 62.3% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 185 | 0.9% |
TOTAL | 20,658 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Rockingham County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 13,899 | 52.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,062 | 45.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 626 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 26,589 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Rowan County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 22,688 | 63.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,153 | 34.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 733 | 2.1% |
TOTAL | 35,579 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Rutherford County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 10,012 | 57.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,101 | 40.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 242 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 17,355 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Sampson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 8,367 | 51.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,645 | 47.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 171 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 16,195 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Scotland County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,072 | 40.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,442 | 58.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 74 | 1.0% |
TOTAL | 7,589 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Stanly County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 11,680 | 62.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,643 | 35.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 366 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 18,689 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Stokes County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 8,567 | 62.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,888 | 35.4% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 335 | 2.4% |
TOTAL | 13,799 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Surry County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 10,723 | 58.8% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,161 | 39.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 362 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 18,247 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Swain County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,636 | 45.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 1,940 | 53.7% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 40 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 3,616 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Transylvania County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 6,416 | 56.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,862 | 42.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 156 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 11,435 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Tyrrell County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 478 | 40.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 701 | 58.6% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 17 | 1.4% |
TOTAL | 1,196 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Union County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 24,032 | 65.6% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 12,059 | 32.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 545 | 1.5% |
TOTAL | 36,641 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Vance County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 4,126 | 42.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 5,584 | 57.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 73 | 0.7% |
TOTAL | 9,785 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Wake County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 122,445 | 54.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 100,371 | 44.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 2,780 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 225,623 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Warren County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,900 | 32.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,833 | 66.5% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 33 | 0.6% |
TOTAL | 5,768 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Washington County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 1,658 | 38.9% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 2,548 | 59.9% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 51 | 1.2% |
TOTAL | 4,257 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Watauga County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 8,832 | 56.2% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 6,561 | 41.7% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 320 | 2.0% |
TOTAL | 15,729 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Wayne County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 16,372 | 60.1% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 10,637 | 39.0% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 223 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 27,255 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Wilkes County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 12,238 | 61.5% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 7,208 | 36.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 448 | 2.3% |
TOTAL | 19,900 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Wilson County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 9,756 | 51.0% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 9,230 | 48.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 151 | 0.8% |
TOTAL | 19,137 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Yadkin County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 8,128 | 70.3% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 3,139 | 27.1% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 292 | 2.5% |
TOTAL | 11,566 | ||||||||
|
2002 Senate class 2, Yancey County | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Elizabeth Dole (R) | 3,917 | 47.7% | Erskine Bowles (D) | 4,203 | 51.2% | Sean Haugh (Lbt) | 87 | 1.1% |
TOTAL | 8,216 | ||||||||
|
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Elizabeth Dole | |
Total Disbursements: | $13,735,220 |
Total Receipts: | $13,840,946 |
Cash on Hand: | $105,727 |
Candidate Contributions: | $30,736 |
Candidate Loans: | $0 |
Individual Contributions: | $11,149,786 |
Party Contributions: | $28,166 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $1,469,611 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $1,124,663 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $126,472 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $2 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $126,470 |
Net Spending: | $13,861,690 |
Erskine Bowles | |
Total Disbursements: | $13,306,317 |
Total Receipts: | $13,335,229 |
Cash on Hand: | $28,913 |
Candidate Contributions: | $0 |
Candidate Loans: | $6,850,000 |
Individual Contributions: | $5,235,680 |
Party Contributions: | $18,850 |
Other Committee Contributions: | $523,128 |
Other Committee Transfers: | $658,655 |
Indep. Expenditures Supporting: | $90,913 |
Indep. Expenditures Opposing: | $0 |
Net Independent Expenditures: | $90,913 |
Net Spending: | $13,397,230 |
**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
Source: https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/senate/NC/2002
Republican Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
1 | Elizabeth Dole | 342,631 | 80.4% | $13,735,220 |
2 | Jim Snyder | 60,477 | 14.2% | $378,315 |
3 | Jim Parker | 8,752 | 2.1% | $69,772 |
4 | Ada Fisher | 6,045 | 1.4% | $10,835 |
5 | Douglas Sellers | 3,771 | 0.9% | |
6 | Timothy Cook | 2,643 | 0.6% | |
7 | Venkat Challa | 1,787 | 0.4% | $30,790 |
TOTAL VOTES | 426,106 |
Democrat Primary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Candidate | Votes | % | $** |
1 | Erskine Bowles | 277,329 | 43.4% | $13,306,317 |
2 | Dan Blue | 184,216 | 28.8% | $801,574 |
3 | Elaine Marshall | 97,392 | 15.2% | $964,367 |
4 | Cynthia Brown | 27,799 | 4.4% | $44,766 |
5 | Albert Wiley | 12,725 | 2.0% | $31,035 |
6 | Bob Ayers | 12,326 | 1.9% | |
7 | David Tidwell | 10,510 | 1.6% | $4,281 |
8 | Duke Underwood | 9,940 | 1.6% | |
9 | Randy Crow | 6,788 | 1.1% | $6,832 |
TOTAL VOTES | 639,025 |