1992-11-03 Gubernatorial Election Results for Indiana

Click on a county in the table or the map to see demographic data for that county.

County	Turnout	Evan Bayh* (D)		Linley Pearson (R)		Mary Barton (New Alliance)		Other		Margin	TOTAL
Adams	58%	7,906	62.7%	4,533	36.0%	163	1.3%	0	0.0%	3,373	12,602
Allen	53%	71,007	59.9%	46,056	38.9%	1,441	1.2%	2	0.0%	24,951	118,506
Bartholomew	56%	16,355	61.0%	10,183	38.0%	294	1.1%	0	0.0%	6,172	26,832
Benton	63%	2,457	57.4%	1,743	40.7%	81	1.9%	0	0.0%	714	4,281
Blackford	54%	3,770	66.7%	1,807	32.0%	74	1.3%	0	0.0%	1,963	5,651
Boone	59%	8,568	50.4%	8,365	49.2%	58	0.3%	0	0.0%	203	16,991
Brown	56%	3,941	64.6%	2,094	34.3%	62	1.0%	0	0.0%	1,847	6,097
Carroll	60%	4,919	58.3%	3,474	41.2%	42	0.5%	0	0.0%	1,445	8,435
Cass	55%	8,932	56.9%	6,720	42.8%	50	0.3%	0	0.0%	2,212	15,702
Clark	50%	23,825	71.5%	9,384	28.2%	121	0.4%	0	0.0%	14,441	33,330
Clay	55%	6,744	66.9%	3,230	32.0%	106	1.1%	0	0.0%	3,514	10,080
Clinton	53%	5,309	44.1%	6,640	55.2%	80	0.7%	0	0.0%	-1,331	12,029
Crawford	65%	3,005	62.8%	1,765	36.9%	12	0.3%	0	0.0%	1,240	4,782
Daviess	52%	5,755	56.1%	4,439	43.3%	66	0.6%	0	0.0%	1,316	10,260
De Kalb	54%	7,565	54.1%	6,357	45.5%	59	0.4%	0	0.0%	1,208	13,981
Dearborn	49%	7,699	54.7%	6,265	44.5%	105	0.7%	0	0.0%	1,434	14,069
Decatur	60%	6,328	62.0%	3,713	36.4%	158	1.5%	1	0.0%	2,615	10,200
Delaware	53%	32,802	66.1%	15,932	32.1%	922	1.9%	0	0.0%	16,870	49,656
Dubois	56%	9,884	65.6%	5,151	34.2%	35	0.2%	0	0.0%	4,733	15,070
Elkhart	45%	28,271	54.8%	22,616	43.9%	682	1.3%	0	0.0%	5,655	51,569
Fayette	53%	6,257	62.1%	3,778	37.5%	45	0.4%	0	0.0%	2,479	10,080
Floyd	58%	18,956	68.0%	8,875	31.8%	61	0.2%	0	0.0%	10,081	27,892
Fountain	63%	4,989	59.8%	3,215	38.5%	143	1.7%	0	0.0%	1,774	8,347
Franklin	54%	4,564	59.3%	2,974	38.7%	155	2.0%	0	0.0%	1,590	7,693
Fulton	60%	4,877	57.8%	3,428	40.6%	129	1.5%	0	0.0%	1,449	8,434
Gibson	59%	9,832	69.5%	4,153	29.4%	162	1.1%	0	0.0%	5,679	14,147
Grant	50%	16,566	59.4%	11,043	39.6%	293	1.1%	0	0.0%	5,523	27,902
Greene	57%	8,594	65.7%	4,440	33.9%	47	0.4%	0	0.0%	4,154	13,081
Hamilton	62%	27,499	50.8%	26,040	48.1%	585	1.1%	1	0.0%	1,459	54,125
Hancock	59%	11,434	56.1%	8,604	42.2%	348	1.7%	0	0.0%	2,830	20,386
Harrison	61%	9,581	70.8%	3,726	27.6%	217	1.6%	0	0.0%	5,855	13,524
Hendricks	55%	16,453	50.9%	15,412	47.7%	436	1.3%	0	0.0%	1,041	32,301
Henry	54%	12,323	62.2%	7,174	36.2%	309	1.6%	0	0.0%	5,149	19,806
Howard	55%	19,824	60.1%	12,730	38.6%	457	1.4%	0	0.0%	7,094	33,011
Huntington	59%	8,455	55.1%	6,756	44.0%	143	0.9%	0	0.0%	1,699	15,354
Jackson	54%	9,352	61.0%	5,919	38.6%	52	0.3%	0	0.0%	3,433	15,323
Jasper	52%	4,671	48.8%	4,781	49.9%	128	1.3%	0	0.0%	-110	9,580
Jay	55%	5,413	62.2%	3,147	36.2%	137	1.6%	0	0.0%	2,266	8,697
Jefferson	55%	7,637	60.8%	4,841	38.5%	81	0.6%	0	0.0%	2,796	12,559
Jennings	55%	5,399	55.3%	4,292	44.0%	67	0.7%	4	0.0%	1,107	9,762
Johnson	54%	20,391	55.6%	15,587	42.5%	679	1.9%	0	0.0%	4,804	36,657
Knox	54%	10,264	62.0%	6,109	36.9%	191	1.2%	0	0.0%	4,155	16,564
Kosciusko	51%	12,258	50.1%	11,897	48.6%	307	1.3%	0	0.0%	361	24,462
La Porte	51%	26,963	65.5%	13,547	32.9%	682	1.7%	0	0.0%	13,416	41,192
Lagrange	36%	3,936	54.4%	3,291	45.5%	3	0.0%	0	0.0%	645	7,230
Lake	52%	122,861	68.7%	53,720	30.0%	2,364	1.3%	0	0.0%	69,141	178,945
Lawrence	50%	9,418	58.1%	6,650	41.0%	147	0.9%	0	0.0%	2,768	16,215
Madison	59%	38,130	65.2%	19,294	33.0%	1,038	1.8%	0	0.0%	18,836	58,462
Marion	51%	189,575	61.5%	117,400	38.1%	1,489	0.5%	27	0.0%	72,175	308,491
Marshall	52%	9,007	56.6%	6,844	43.0%	63	0.4%	0	0.0%	2,163	15,914
Martin	70%	3,354	63.4%	1,918	36.3%	19	0.4%	0	0.0%	1,436	5,291
Miami	50%	7,586	57.1%	5,652	42.5%	54	0.4%	0	0.0%	1,934	13,292
Monroe	46%	28,193	67.3%	12,834	30.6%	866	2.1%	0	0.0%	15,359	41,893
Montgomery	55%	7,859	54.7%	6,216	43.3%	293	2.0%	0	0.0%	1,643	14,368
Morgan	49%	10,325	50.3%	9,911	48.3%	293	1.4%	11	0.1%	414	20,540
Newton	54%	2,776	52.6%	2,394	45.4%	105	2.0%	0	0.0%	382	5,275
Noble	48%	7,717	57.8%	5,451	40.8%	186	1.4%	0	0.0%	2,266	13,354
Ohio	62%	1,449	59.0%	957	39.0%	48	2.0%	0	0.0%	492	2,454
Orange	58%	4,294	54.3%	3,513	44.4%	108	1.4%	0	0.0%	781	7,915
Owen	48%	3,972	62.2%	2,319	36.3%	91	1.4%	0	0.0%	1,653	6,382
Parke	60%	4,445	63.0%	2,497	35.4%	114	1.6%	0	0.0%	1,948	7,056
Perry	64%	6,338	69.0%	2,827	30.8%	24	0.3%	0	0.0%	3,511	9,189
Pike	66%	4,264	67.5%	1,969	31.2%	81	1.3%	0	0.0%	2,295	6,314
Porter	58%	33,533	59.5%	21,658	38.5%	1,129	2.0%	2	0.0%	11,875	56,322
Posey	60%	7,827	69.0%	3,324	29.3%	192	1.7%	0	0.0%	4,503	11,343
Pulaski	62%	3,383	59.3%	2,306	40.4%	16	0.3%	0	0.0%	1,077	5,705
Putnam	48%	6,797	58.6%	4,653	40.1%	155	1.3%	0	0.0%	2,144	11,605
Randolph	58%	6,861	58.7%	4,612	39.5%	208	1.8%	0	0.0%	2,249	11,681
Ripley	57%	5,828	56.7%	4,401	42.8%	52	0.5%	0	0.0%	1,427	10,281
Rush	60%	4,745	59.8%	3,100	39.0%	95	1.2%	0	0.0%	1,645	7,940
Scott	43%	4,694	69.9%	1,990	29.6%	29	0.4%	0	0.0%	2,704	6,713
Shelby	53%	9,322	59.1%	6,324	40.1%	139	0.9%	0	0.0%	2,998	15,785
Spencer	65%	5,695	61.5%	3,561	38.4%	10	0.1%	0	0.0%	2,134	9,266
St. Joseph	53%	69,742	70.3%	29,164	29.4%	304	0.3%	2	0.0%	40,578	99,212
Starke	50%	5,322	64.7%	2,855	34.7%	49	0.6%	0	0.0%	2,467	8,226
Steuben	52%	6,201	56.6%	4,706	42.9%	58	0.5%	0	0.0%	1,495	10,965
Sullivan	59%	6,488	74.6%	2,159	24.8%	45	0.5%	0	0.0%	4,329	8,692
Switzerland	52%	1,950	64.2%	1,075	35.4%	14	0.5%	0	0.0%	875	3,039
Tippecanoe	47%	29,840	60.3%	18,742	37.9%	897	1.8%	3	0.0%	11,098	49,482
Tipton	64%	4,450	57.9%	3,157	41.1%	76	1.0%	0	0.0%	1,293	7,683
Union	56%	1,457	51.4%	1,339	47.3%	36	1.3%	0	0.0%	118	2,832
Vanderburgh	59%	53,240	71.0%	20,782	27.7%	982	1.3%	0	0.0%	32,458	75,004
Vermillion	62%	5,924	76.0%	1,746	22.4%	127	1.6%	0	0.0%	4,178	7,797
Vigo	51%	31,036	74.6%	10,030	24.1%	533	1.3%	1	0.0%	21,006	41,600
Wabash	55%	8,124	57.0%	6,080	42.7%	46	0.3%	0	0.0%	2,044	14,250
Warren	64%	2,359	60.7%	1,471	37.9%	55	1.4%	0	0.0%	888	3,885
Warrick	61%	13,951	68.2%	6,202	30.3%	300	1.5%	0	0.0%	7,749	20,453
Washington	53%	5,685	60.7%	3,619	38.7%	55	0.6%	0	0.0%	2,066	9,359
Wayne	50%	15,261	57.1%	11,106	41.6%	347	1.3%	0	0.0%	4,155	26,714
Wells	63%	6,694	56.0%	5,111	42.7%	159	1.3%	0	0.0%	1,583	11,964
White	57%	5,800	59.1%	3,862	39.3%	157	1.6%	0	0.0%	1,938	9,819
Whitley	59%	6,849	57.5%	4,806	40.3%	262	2.2%	0	0.0%	2,043	11,917
TOTAL	54%	1,382,151	62.0%	822,533	36.9%	24,378	1.1%	54	0.0%	559,618	2,229,116
Total R vote: 822,533 (36.9%)      Total D vote: 1,382,151 (62.0%)      Total Other vote: 24,432 (1.1%)
* incumbent
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Total Disbursements:		$4,223,141		$1,833,475		$60
Total Receipts:		$0		$0		$0

1992 Governor, Adams County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,906	62.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,533	36.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	163	1.3%
TOTAL	12,602
Turnout: 58%

1992 Governor, Allen County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	71,007	59.9%
Linley Pearson (R)	46,056	38.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	1,441	1.2%
TOTAL	118,506
Turnout: 53%

1992 Governor, Bartholomew County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	16,355	61.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	10,183	38.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	294	1.1%
TOTAL	26,832
Turnout: 56%

1992 Governor, Benton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	2,457	57.4%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,743	40.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	81	1.9%
TOTAL	4,281
Turnout: 63%

1992 Governor, Blackford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	3,770	66.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,807	32.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	74	1.3%
TOTAL	5,651
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Boone County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	8,568	50.4%
Linley Pearson (R)	8,365	49.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	58	0.3%
TOTAL	16,991
Turnout: 59%

1992 Governor, Brown County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	3,941	64.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,094	34.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	62	1.0%
TOTAL	6,097
Turnout: 56%

1992 Governor, Carroll County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,919	58.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,474	41.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	42	0.5%
TOTAL	8,435
Turnout: 60%

1992 Governor, Cass County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	8,932	56.9%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,720	42.8%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	50	0.3%
TOTAL	15,702
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Clark County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	23,825	71.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	9,384	28.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	121	0.4%
TOTAL	33,330
Turnout: 50%

1992 Governor, Clay County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,744	66.9%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,230	32.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	106	1.1%
TOTAL	10,080
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Clinton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,309	44.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,640	55.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	80	0.7%
TOTAL	12,029
Turnout: 53%

1992 Governor, Crawford County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	3,005	62.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,765	36.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	12	0.3%
TOTAL	4,782
Turnout: 65%

1992 Governor, Daviess County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,755	56.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,439	43.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	66	0.6%
TOTAL	10,260
Turnout: 52%

1992 Governor, De Kalb County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,565	54.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,357	45.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	59	0.4%
TOTAL	13,981
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Dearborn County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,699	54.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,265	44.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	105	0.7%
TOTAL	14,069
Turnout: 49%

1992 Governor, Decatur County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,328	62.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,713	36.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	158	1.5%
TOTAL	10,200
Turnout: 60%

1992 Governor, Delaware County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	32,802	66.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	15,932	32.1%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	922	1.9%
TOTAL	49,656
Turnout: 53%

1992 Governor, Dubois County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	9,884	65.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	5,151	34.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	35	0.2%
TOTAL	15,070
Turnout: 56%

1992 Governor, Elkhart County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	28,271	54.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	22,616	43.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	682	1.3%
TOTAL	51,569
Turnout: 45%

1992 Governor, Fayette County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,257	62.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,778	37.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	45	0.4%
TOTAL	10,080
Turnout: 53%

1992 Governor, Floyd County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	18,956	68.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	8,875	31.8%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	61	0.2%
TOTAL	27,892
Turnout: 58%

1992 Governor, Fountain County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,989	59.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,215	38.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	143	1.7%
TOTAL	8,347
Turnout: 63%

1992 Governor, Franklin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,564	59.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,974	38.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	155	2.0%
TOTAL	7,693
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Fulton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,877	57.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,428	40.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	129	1.5%
TOTAL	8,434
Turnout: 60%

1992 Governor, Gibson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	9,832	69.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,153	29.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	162	1.1%
TOTAL	14,147
Turnout: 59%

1992 Governor, Grant County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	16,566	59.4%
Linley Pearson (R)	11,043	39.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	293	1.1%
TOTAL	27,902
Turnout: 50%

1992 Governor, Greene County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	8,594	65.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,440	33.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	47	0.4%
TOTAL	13,081
Turnout: 57%

1992 Governor, Hamilton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	27,499	50.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	26,040	48.1%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	585	1.1%
TOTAL	54,125
Turnout: 62%

1992 Governor, Hancock County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	11,434	56.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	8,604	42.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	348	1.7%
TOTAL	20,386
Turnout: 59%

1992 Governor, Harrison County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	9,581	70.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,726	27.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	217	1.6%
TOTAL	13,524
Turnout: 61%

1992 Governor, Hendricks County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	16,453	50.9%
Linley Pearson (R)	15,412	47.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	436	1.3%
TOTAL	32,301
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Henry County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	12,323	62.2%
Linley Pearson (R)	7,174	36.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	309	1.6%
TOTAL	19,806
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Howard County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	19,824	60.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	12,730	38.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	457	1.4%
TOTAL	33,011
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Huntington County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	8,455	55.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,756	44.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	143	0.9%
TOTAL	15,354
Turnout: 59%

1992 Governor, Jackson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	9,352	61.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	5,919	38.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	52	0.3%
TOTAL	15,323
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Jasper County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,671	48.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,781	49.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	128	1.3%
TOTAL	9,580
Turnout: 52%

1992 Governor, Jay County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,413	62.2%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,147	36.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	137	1.6%
TOTAL	8,697
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Jefferson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,637	60.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,841	38.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	81	0.6%
TOTAL	12,559
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Jennings County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,399	55.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,292	44.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	67	0.7%
TOTAL	9,762
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Johnson County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	20,391	55.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	15,587	42.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	679	1.9%
TOTAL	36,657
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Knox County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	10,264	62.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,109	36.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	191	1.2%
TOTAL	16,564
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Kosciusko County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	12,258	50.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	11,897	48.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	307	1.3%
TOTAL	24,462
Turnout: 51%

1992 Governor, La Porte County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	26,963	65.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	13,547	32.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	682	1.7%
TOTAL	41,192
Turnout: 51%

1992 Governor, Lagrange County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	3,936	54.4%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,291	45.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	3	0.0%
TOTAL	7,230
Turnout: 36%

1992 Governor, Lake County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	122,861	68.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	53,720	30.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	2,364	1.3%
TOTAL	178,945
Turnout: 52%

1992 Governor, Lawrence County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	9,418	58.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,650	41.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	147	0.9%
TOTAL	16,215
Turnout: 50%

1992 Governor, Madison County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	38,130	65.2%
Linley Pearson (R)	19,294	33.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	1,038	1.8%
TOTAL	58,462
Turnout: 59%

1992 Governor, Marion County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	189,575	61.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	117,400	38.1%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	1,489	0.5%
TOTAL	308,491
Turnout: 51%

1992 Governor, Marshall County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	9,007	56.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,844	43.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	63	0.4%
TOTAL	15,914
Turnout: 52%

1992 Governor, Martin County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	3,354	63.4%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,918	36.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	19	0.4%
TOTAL	5,291
Turnout: 70%

1992 Governor, Miami County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,586	57.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	5,652	42.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	54	0.4%
TOTAL	13,292
Turnout: 50%

1992 Governor, Monroe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	28,193	67.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	12,834	30.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	866	2.1%
TOTAL	41,893
Turnout: 46%

1992 Governor, Montgomery County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,859	54.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,216	43.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	293	2.0%
TOTAL	14,368
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Morgan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	10,325	50.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	9,911	48.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	293	1.4%
TOTAL	20,540
Turnout: 49%

1992 Governor, Newton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	2,776	52.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,394	45.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	105	2.0%
TOTAL	5,275
Turnout: 54%

1992 Governor, Noble County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,717	57.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	5,451	40.8%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	186	1.4%
TOTAL	13,354
Turnout: 48%

1992 Governor, Ohio County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	1,449	59.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	957	39.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	48	2.0%
TOTAL	2,454
Turnout: 62%

1992 Governor, Orange County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,294	54.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,513	44.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	108	1.4%
TOTAL	7,915
Turnout: 58%

1992 Governor, Owen County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	3,972	62.2%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,319	36.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	91	1.4%
TOTAL	6,382
Turnout: 48%

1992 Governor, Parke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,445	63.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,497	35.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	114	1.6%
TOTAL	7,056
Turnout: 60%

1992 Governor, Perry County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,338	69.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,827	30.8%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	24	0.3%
TOTAL	9,189
Turnout: 64%

1992 Governor, Pike County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,264	67.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,969	31.2%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	81	1.3%
TOTAL	6,314
Turnout: 66%

1992 Governor, Porter County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	33,533	59.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	21,658	38.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	1,129	2.0%
TOTAL	56,322
Turnout: 58%

1992 Governor, Posey County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	7,827	69.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,324	29.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	192	1.7%
TOTAL	11,343
Turnout: 60%

1992 Governor, Pulaski County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	3,383	59.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,306	40.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	16	0.3%
TOTAL	5,705
Turnout: 62%

1992 Governor, Putnam County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,797	58.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,653	40.1%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	155	1.3%
TOTAL	11,605
Turnout: 48%

1992 Governor, Randolph County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,861	58.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,612	39.5%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	208	1.8%
TOTAL	11,681
Turnout: 58%

1992 Governor, Ripley County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,828	56.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,401	42.8%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	52	0.5%
TOTAL	10,281
Turnout: 57%

1992 Governor, Rush County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,745	59.8%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,100	39.0%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	95	1.2%
TOTAL	7,940
Turnout: 60%

1992 Governor, Scott County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,694	69.9%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,990	29.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	29	0.4%
TOTAL	6,713
Turnout: 43%

1992 Governor, Shelby County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	9,322	59.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,324	40.1%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	139	0.9%
TOTAL	15,785
Turnout: 53%

1992 Governor, Spencer County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,695	61.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,561	38.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	10	0.1%
TOTAL	9,266
Turnout: 65%

1992 Governor, St. Joseph County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	69,742	70.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	29,164	29.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	304	0.3%
TOTAL	99,212
Turnout: 53%

1992 Governor, Starke County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,322	64.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,855	34.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	49	0.6%
TOTAL	8,226
Turnout: 50%

1992 Governor, Steuben County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,201	56.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,706	42.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	58	0.5%
TOTAL	10,965
Turnout: 52%

1992 Governor, Sullivan County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,488	74.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	2,159	24.8%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	45	0.5%
TOTAL	8,692
Turnout: 59%

1992 Governor, Switzerland County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	1,950	64.2%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,075	35.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	14	0.5%
TOTAL	3,039
Turnout: 52%

1992 Governor, Tippecanoe County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	29,840	60.3%
Linley Pearson (R)	18,742	37.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	897	1.8%
TOTAL	49,482
Turnout: 47%

1992 Governor, Tipton County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	4,450	57.9%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,157	41.1%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	76	1.0%
TOTAL	7,683
Turnout: 64%

1992 Governor, Union County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	1,457	51.4%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,339	47.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	36	1.3%
TOTAL	2,832
Turnout: 56%

1992 Governor, Vanderburgh County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	53,240	71.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	20,782	27.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	982	1.3%
TOTAL	75,004
Turnout: 59%

1992 Governor, Vermillion County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,924	76.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,746	22.4%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	127	1.6%
TOTAL	7,797
Turnout: 62%

1992 Governor, Vigo County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	31,036	74.6%
Linley Pearson (R)	10,030	24.1%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	533	1.3%
TOTAL	41,600
Turnout: 51%

1992 Governor, Wabash County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	8,124	57.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,080	42.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	46	0.3%
TOTAL	14,250
Turnout: 55%

1992 Governor, Warren County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	2,359	60.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	1,471	37.9%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	55	1.4%
TOTAL	3,885
Turnout: 64%

1992 Governor, Warrick County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	13,951	68.2%
Linley Pearson (R)	6,202	30.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	300	1.5%
TOTAL	20,453
Turnout: 61%

1992 Governor, Washington County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,685	60.7%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,619	38.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	55	0.6%
TOTAL	9,359
Turnout: 53%

1992 Governor, Wayne County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	15,261	57.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	11,106	41.6%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	347	1.3%
TOTAL	26,714
Turnout: 50%

1992 Governor, Wells County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,694	56.0%
Linley Pearson (R)	5,111	42.7%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	159	1.3%
TOTAL	11,964
Turnout: 63%

1992 Governor, White County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	5,800	59.1%
Linley Pearson (R)	3,862	39.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	157	1.6%
TOTAL	9,819
Turnout: 57%

1992 Governor, Whitley County
Candidate	Votes	Pct
Evan Bayh* (D)	6,849	57.5%
Linley Pearson (R)	4,806	40.3%
Mary Barton (New Alliance)	262	2.2%
TOTAL	11,917
Turnout: 59%

Campaign finance data for this election**:

Evan Bayh*
Total Disbursements:	$4,223,141

Linley Pearson
Total Disbursements:	$1,833,475

**Financial data shown here takes into account all elections for this office during this cycle, including primary, special and runoff elections, if any.
The financial data used here were originally collected by Thad Beyle and Jennifer M. Jensen

Mary Barton
Total Disbursements:	$60