Turnout | Mike DeWine* (R) |
Nan Whaley (D) |
Other | Margin | TOTAL | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Addyston village | n/a | 153 | 76.1% | 48 | 23.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 105 | 201 |
Amberley village | n/a | 1,040 | 46.9% | 1,177 | 53.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -137 | 2,217 |
Anderson township | n/a | 13,723 | 61.0% | 8,764 | 39.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 4,959 | 22,487 |
Arlington Heights village | n/a | 109 | 59.2% | 75 | 40.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 34 | 184 |
Blue Ash city | n/a | 3,258 | 50.8% | 3,159 | 49.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 99 | 6,417 |
Cheviot city | n/a | 1,346 | 54.1% | 1,141 | 45.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 205 | 2,487 |
Cincinnati city | n/a | 27,216 | 29.8% | 64,181 | 70.2% | 0 | 0.0% | -36,965 | 91,397 |
Cleves village | n/a | 943 | 80.5% | 228 | 19.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 715 | 1,171 |
Colerain township | n/a | 13,899 | 66.0% | 7,173 | 34.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 6,726 | 21,072 |
Columbia township | n/a | 735 | 38.6% | 1,167 | 61.4% | 0 | 0.0% | -432 | 1,902 |
Crosby township | n/a | 1,363 | 84.8% | 244 | 15.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,119 | 1,607 |
Deer Park city | n/a | 1,209 | 55.6% | 967 | 44.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 242 | 2,176 |
Delhi township | n/a | 8,536 | 74.9% | 2,863 | 25.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 5,673 | 11,399 |
Elmwood Place village | n/a | 197 | 67.0% | 97 | 33.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 100 | 294 |
Evendale village | n/a | 1,018 | 62.4% | 613 | 37.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 405 | 1,631 |
Fairfax village | n/a | 410 | 54.8% | 338 | 45.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 72 | 748 |
Forest Park city | n/a | 1,380 | 25.7% | 3,982 | 74.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -2,602 | 5,362 |
Glendale village | n/a | 787 | 54.5% | 657 | 45.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 130 | 1,444 |
Golf Manor village | n/a | 298 | 24.4% | 923 | 75.6% | 0 | 0.0% | -625 | 1,221 |
Green township | n/a | 20,680 | 75.3% | 6,778 | 24.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 13,902 | 27,458 |
Greenhills village | n/a | 829 | 57.4% | 615 | 42.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 214 | 1,444 |
Harrison city | n/a | 3,905 | 81.4% | 891 | 18.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 3,014 | 4,796 |
Harrison township | n/a | 1,433 | 84.4% | 264 | 15.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,169 | 1,697 |
Lincoln Heights village | n/a | 68 | 9.9% | 618 | 90.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -550 | 686 |
Lockland village | n/a | 404 | 57.0% | 305 | 43.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 99 | 709 |
Loveland city | n/a | 2,500 | 62.5% | 1,500 | 37.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,000 | 4,000 |
Madeira city | n/a | 2,861 | 57.2% | 2,143 | 42.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 718 | 5,004 |
Mariemont village | n/a | 853 | 48.7% | 898 | 51.3% | 0 | 0.0% | -45 | 1,751 |
Miami township | n/a | 4,754 | 84.9% | 843 | 15.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 3,911 | 5,597 |
Milford city | n/a | 10 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 10 |
Montgomery city | n/a | 3,570 | 57.2% | 2,671 | 42.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 899 | 6,241 |
Mount Healthy city | n/a | 786 | 42.5% | 1,063 | 57.5% | 0 | 0.0% | -277 | 1,849 |
Newtown village | n/a | 788 | 66.6% | 396 | 33.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 392 | 1,184 |
North Bend village | n/a | 459 | 88.3% | 61 | 11.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 398 | 520 |
North College Hill city | n/a | 991 | 38.0% | 1,617 | 62.0% | 0 | 0.0% | -626 | 2,608 |
Norwood city | n/a | 2,751 | 48.4% | 2,931 | 51.6% | 0 | 0.0% | -180 | 5,682 |
Reading city | n/a | 2,419 | 67.7% | 1,155 | 32.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,264 | 3,574 |
Sharonville city | n/a | 2,582 | 61.1% | 1,644 | 38.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 938 | 4,226 |
Silverton village | n/a | 584 | 29.9% | 1,371 | 70.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -787 | 1,955 |
Springdale city | n/a | 1,610 | 46.1% | 1,885 | 53.9% | 0 | 0.0% | -275 | 3,495 |
Springfield township | n/a | 6,190 | 43.9% | 7,911 | 56.1% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,721 | 14,101 |
St. Bernard village | n/a | 810 | 52.6% | 730 | 47.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 80 | 1,540 |
Sycamore township | n/a | 5,072 | 60.0% | 3,386 | 40.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,686 | 8,458 |
Symmes township | n/a | 4,281 | 60.1% | 2,846 | 39.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,435 | 7,127 |
Terrace Park village | n/a | 711 | 57.7% | 522 | 42.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 189 | 1,233 |
The Village of Indian Hill city | n/a | 2,458 | 70.2% | 1,045 | 29.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,413 | 3,503 |
Whitewater township | n/a | 1,498 | 84.2% | 281 | 15.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 1,217 | 1,779 |
Woodlawn village | n/a | 216 | 18.3% | 966 | 81.7% | 0 | 0.0% | -750 | 1,182 |
Wyoming city | n/a | 1,884 | 39.5% | 2,890 | 60.5% | 0 | 0.0% | -1,006 | 4,774 |
TOTAL | 48% | 155,577 | 51.2% | 148,023 | 48.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 7,554 | 303,971 |
2022 Governor, Addyston village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 153 | 76.1% | Nan Whaley (D) | 48 | 23.9% | ||
TOTAL | 201 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Amberley village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,040 | 46.9% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,177 | 53.1% | ||
TOTAL | 2,217 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Anderson township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 13,723 | 61.0% | Nan Whaley (D) | 8,764 | 39.0% | ||
TOTAL | 22,487 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Arlington Heights village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 109 | 59.2% | Nan Whaley (D) | 75 | 40.8% | ||
TOTAL | 184 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Blue Ash city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 3,258 | 50.8% | Nan Whaley (D) | 3,159 | 49.2% | ||
TOTAL | 6,417 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Cheviot city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,346 | 54.1% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,141 | 45.9% | ||
TOTAL | 2,487 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Cincinnati city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 27,216 | 29.8% | Nan Whaley (D) | 64,181 | 70.2% | ||
TOTAL | 91,397 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Cleves village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 943 | 80.5% | Nan Whaley (D) | 228 | 19.5% | ||
TOTAL | 1,171 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Colerain township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 13,899 | 66.0% | Nan Whaley (D) | 7,173 | 34.0% | ||
TOTAL | 21,072 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Columbia township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 735 | 38.6% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,167 | 61.4% | ||
TOTAL | 1,902 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Crosby township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,363 | 84.8% | Nan Whaley (D) | 244 | 15.2% | ||
TOTAL | 1,607 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Deer Park city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,209 | 55.6% | Nan Whaley (D) | 967 | 44.4% | ||
TOTAL | 2,176 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Delhi township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 8,536 | 74.9% | Nan Whaley (D) | 2,863 | 25.1% | ||
TOTAL | 11,399 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Elmwood Place village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 197 | 67.0% | Nan Whaley (D) | 97 | 33.0% | ||
TOTAL | 294 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Evendale village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,018 | 62.4% | Nan Whaley (D) | 613 | 37.6% | ||
TOTAL | 1,631 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Fairfax village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 410 | 54.8% | Nan Whaley (D) | 338 | 45.2% | ||
TOTAL | 748 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Forest Park city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,380 | 25.7% | Nan Whaley (D) | 3,982 | 74.3% | ||
TOTAL | 5,362 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Glendale village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 787 | 54.5% | Nan Whaley (D) | 657 | 45.5% | ||
TOTAL | 1,444 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Golf Manor village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 298 | 24.4% | Nan Whaley (D) | 923 | 75.6% | ||
TOTAL | 1,221 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Green township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 20,680 | 75.3% | Nan Whaley (D) | 6,778 | 24.7% | ||
TOTAL | 27,458 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Greenhills village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 829 | 57.4% | Nan Whaley (D) | 615 | 42.6% | ||
TOTAL | 1,444 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Harrison city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 3,905 | 81.4% | Nan Whaley (D) | 891 | 18.6% | ||
TOTAL | 4,796 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Harrison township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,433 | 84.4% | Nan Whaley (D) | 264 | 15.6% | ||
TOTAL | 1,697 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Lincoln Heights village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 68 | 9.9% | Nan Whaley (D) | 618 | 90.1% | ||
TOTAL | 686 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Lockland village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 404 | 57.0% | Nan Whaley (D) | 305 | 43.0% | ||
TOTAL | 709 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Loveland city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 2,500 | 62.5% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,500 | 37.5% | ||
TOTAL | 4,000 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Madeira city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 2,861 | 57.2% | Nan Whaley (D) | 2,143 | 42.8% | ||
TOTAL | 5,004 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Mariemont village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 853 | 48.7% | Nan Whaley (D) | 898 | 51.3% | ||
TOTAL | 1,751 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Miami township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 4,754 | 84.9% | Nan Whaley (D) | 843 | 15.1% | ||
TOTAL | 5,597 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Milford city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 10 | 100.0% | Nan Whaley (D) | 843 | 8430.0% | ||
TOTAL | 10 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Montgomery city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 3,570 | 57.2% | Nan Whaley (D) | 2,671 | 42.8% | ||
TOTAL | 6,241 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Mount Healthy city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 786 | 42.5% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,063 | 57.5% | ||
TOTAL | 1,849 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Newtown village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 788 | 66.6% | Nan Whaley (D) | 396 | 33.4% | ||
TOTAL | 1,184 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, North Bend village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 459 | 88.3% | Nan Whaley (D) | 61 | 11.7% | ||
TOTAL | 520 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, North College Hill city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 991 | 38.0% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,617 | 62.0% | ||
TOTAL | 2,608 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Norwood city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 2,751 | 48.4% | Nan Whaley (D) | 2,931 | 51.6% | ||
TOTAL | 5,682 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Reading city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 2,419 | 67.7% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,155 | 32.3% | ||
TOTAL | 3,574 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, St. Bernard village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 810 | 52.6% | Nan Whaley (D) | 730 | 47.4% | ||
TOTAL | 1,540 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Sharonville city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 2,582 | 61.1% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,644 | 38.9% | ||
TOTAL | 4,226 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Silverton village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 584 | 29.9% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,371 | 70.1% | ||
TOTAL | 1,955 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Springdale city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,610 | 46.1% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,885 | 53.9% | ||
TOTAL | 3,495 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Springfield township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 6,190 | 43.9% | Nan Whaley (D) | 7,911 | 56.1% | ||
TOTAL | 14,101 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Sycamore township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 5,072 | 60.0% | Nan Whaley (D) | 3,386 | 40.0% | ||
TOTAL | 8,458 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Symmes township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 4,281 | 60.1% | Nan Whaley (D) | 2,846 | 39.9% | ||
TOTAL | 7,127 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Terrace Park village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 711 | 57.7% | Nan Whaley (D) | 522 | 42.3% | ||
TOTAL | 1,233 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, The Village of Indian Hill city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 2,458 | 70.2% | Nan Whaley (D) | 1,045 | 29.8% | ||
TOTAL | 3,503 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Whitewater township | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,498 | 84.2% | Nan Whaley (D) | 281 | 15.8% | ||
TOTAL | 1,779 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Woodlawn village | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 216 | 18.3% | Nan Whaley (D) | 966 | 81.7% | ||
TOTAL | 1,182 | |||||||||
|
2022 Governor, Wyoming city | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Votes | Pct | Mike DeWine* (R) | 1,884 | 39.5% | Nan Whaley (D) | 2,890 | 60.5% | ||
TOTAL | 4,774 | |||||||||
|
Campaign finance data for this election**:
Mike DeWine* | |
Total Disbursements: | $0 |
Nan Whaley | |
Total Disbursements: | $0 |